» Articles » PMID: 22350797

Genetics of Dopamine Receptors and Drug Addiction

Overview
Journal Hum Genet
Specialty Genetics
Date 2012 Feb 22
PMID 22350797
Citations 41
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Dopamine plays a key role in reward behavior, yet the association of drug dependence as a chronic, relapsing disorder with the genes encoding the various dopaminergic receptor subtypes remains difficult to delineate. In the context of subsequent genome-wide association (GWAS) research and post-GWAS investigations, we summarize the novel data that link genes encoding molecules involved in the dopaminergic system (dopamine receptors, transporter and enzymes in charge of its metabolism) to drug addiction. Recent reports indicate that the heritability of drug addiction should be high enough to allow a significant role for a specific set of genes, and the available genetic studies, which might not be already conclusive because of the heterogeneity of designs, methods and recruited samples, should support the idea of a significant role of at least one gene related to dopaminergic system. Evolutionary changes in primates and non-primate animals of genes coding for molecules involved in dopaminergic system highlight why addictive disorders are mainly limited to humans. Restricting the analyses to more specific intermediate phenotypes (or endophenotypes) such as attention allocation, stress reactivity, novelty seeking, behavioral disinhibition and impulsivity, instead of the broad addictive disorder concept can be instrumental to identify novel genes associated with these traits in the context of genome-wide studies.

Citing Articles

Promising Antidepressant Potential: The Role of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG in Mental Health and Stress Response.

Isik M, Kose F, Ozbayer C, Budak O, Kaya R, Erdogan D Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2025; .

PMID: 39962033 DOI: 10.1007/s12602-025-10470-0.


Is There a Natural, Non-addictive, and Non-anti-reward, Safe, Gene-based Solution to Treat Reward Deficiency Syndrome? KB220 Variants vs GLP-1 Analogs.

Modestino E, Bowirrat A, Baron D, Thanos P, Hanna C, Bagchi D J Addict Psychiatry. 2024; 8(1):34-49.

PMID: 39618491 PMC: 11606528.


How life events may confer vulnerability to addiction: the role of epigenetics.

Liu S, Harris A, Gewirtz J Front Mol Neurosci. 2024; 17:1462769.

PMID: 39359689 PMC: 11446245. DOI: 10.3389/fnmol.2024.1462769.


D2 dopamine receptor expression, reactivity to rewards, and reinforcement learning in a complex value-based decision-making task.

Banuelos C, Creswell K, Walsh C, Manuck S, Gianaros P, Verstynen T Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2024; 19(1).

PMID: 38988197 PMC: 11281849. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsae050.


Methamphetamine-induced region-specific transcriptomic and epigenetic changes in the brain of male rats.

Miao B, Xing X, Bazylianska V, Madden P, Moszczynska A, Zhang B Commun Biol. 2023; 6(1):991.

PMID: 37758941 PMC: 10533900. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-023-05355-3.


References
1.
Li Y, Shao C, Zhang D, Zhao M, Lin L, Yan P . The effect of dopamine D2, D5 receptor and transporter (SLC6A3) polymorphisms on the cue-elicited heroin craving in Chinese. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2006; 141B(3):269-73. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.b.30264. View

2.
Lerman C, Shields P, Wileyto E, Audrain J, Hawk Jr L, Pinto A . Effects of dopamine transporter and receptor polymorphisms on smoking cessation in a bupropion clinical trial. Health Psychol. 2003; 22(5):541-8. DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.22.5.541. View

3.
Ma X, Wang Z, Zhang X . Evolution of dopamine-related systems: biosynthesis, degradation and receptors. J Mol Evol. 2010; 71(5-6):374-84. DOI: 10.1007/s00239-010-9392-5. View

4.
Borowsky B, Kuhn C . D1 and D2 dopamine receptors stimulate hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal activity in rats. Neuropharmacology. 1992; 31(7):671-8. DOI: 10.1016/0028-3908(92)90145-f. View

5.
Hosak L, Libiger J, Cizek J, Beranek M, cermakova E . The COMT Val158Met polymorphism is associated with novelty seeking in Czech methamphetamine abusers: preliminary results. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2006; 27(6):799-802. View