Divergence of Duplicate Genes in Exon-intron Structure

Overview

Journal Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

Specialty Science

Date 2012 Jan 11

PMID 22232673

Citations 437

Authors

Guixia Xu

Chunce Guo

Hongyan Shan

Hongzhi Kong

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Gene duplication plays key roles in organismal evolution. Duplicate genes, if they survive, tend to diverge in regulatory and coding regions. Divergences in coding regions, especially those that can change the function of the gene, can be caused by amino acid-altering substitutions and/or alterations in exon-intron structure. Much has been learned about the mode, tempo, and consequences of nucleotide substitutions, yet relatively little is known about structural divergences. In this study, by analyzing 612 pairs of sibling paralogs from seven representative gene families and 300 pairs of one-to-one orthologs from different species, we investigated the occurrence and relative importance of structural divergences during the evolution of duplicate and nonduplicate genes. We found that structural divergences have been very prevalent in duplicate genes and, in many cases, have led to the generation of functionally distinct paralogs. Comparisons of the genomic sequences of these genes further indicated that the differences in exon-intron structure were actually accomplished by three main types of mechanisms (exon/intron gain/loss, exonization/pseudoexonization, and insertion/deletion), each of which contributed differently to structural divergence. Like nucleotide substitutions, insertion/deletion and exonization/pseudoexonization occurred more or less randomly, with the number of observable mutational events per gene pair being largely proportional to evolutionary time. Notably, however, compared with paralogs with similar evolutionary times, orthologs have accumulated significantly fewer structural changes, whereas the amounts of amino acid replacements accumulated did not show clear differences. This finding suggests that structural divergences have played a more important role during the evolution of duplicate than nonduplicate genes.

Citing Articles

The Aldehyde Dehydrogenase Superfamily in L.: Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis Under Low-Temperature Conditions.

Jin T, Wu C, Huang Z, Zhang X, Li S, Ding C Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(5).

PMID: 40076992 PMC: 11901046. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26052373.

Genome-wide identification unravels the role of the arabinogalactan peptide (AGP) gene family in cotton plant architecture.

Tang J, Mehari T, Qian D, Li R, Chen Z, Zhou Z Plant Cell Rep. 2025; 44(4):71.

PMID: 40056176 DOI: 10.1007/s00299-025-03460-7.

Genome-wide identification and characterization of FORMIN gene family in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and their expression profiles in response to multiple abiotic stress treatments.

Paul S, Islam M, Akter N, Zohra F, Rashid S, Ahmed M PLoS One. 2025; 20(3):e0319176.

PMID: 40029892 PMC: 11875364. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319176.

Identification of the SbDUF966 Gene Family in Sorghum and Investigation of It Role in Response to Abiotic Stresses.

Luo Y, Wang M, Jiao W, Huang K, Li J, Chen H Genes (Basel). 2025; 16(2).

PMID: 40004535 PMC: 11855794. DOI: 10.3390/genes16020206.

Genome-Wide Identification and Drought-Responsive Functional Analysis of the Gene Family in Potato ( L.).

Shi N, Fan Y, Zhang W, Zhang Z, Pu Z, Li Z Antioxidants (Basel). 2025; 14(2).

PMID: 40002423 PMC: 11852095. DOI: 10.3390/antiox14020239.

References

Hoekstra H, Coyne J . The locus of evolution: evo devo and the genetics of adaptation. Evolution. 2007; 61(5):995-1016. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00105.x. View

Lynch M, Conery J . The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science. 2000; 290(5494):1151-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.290.5494.1151. View

Innan H, Kondrashov F . The evolution of gene duplications: classifying and distinguishing between models. Nat Rev Genet. 2010; 11(2):97-108. DOI: 10.1038/nrg2689. View

Long M, de Souza S, Rosenberg C, Gilbert W . Exon shuffling and the origin of the mitochondrial targeting function in plant cytochrome c1 precursor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996; 93(15):7727-31. PMC: 38815. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.93.15.7727. View

Force A, Lynch M, Pickett F, Amores A, Yan Y, Postlethwait J . Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations. Genetics. 1999; 151(4):1531-45. PMC: 1460548. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/151.4.1531. View

Patthy L . Genome evolution and the evolution of exon-shuffling--a review. Gene. 1999; 238(1):103-14. DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1119(99)00228-0. View

Li W, Yang J, Gu X . Expression divergence between duplicate genes. Trends Genet. 2005; 21(11):602-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2005.08.006. View

Nei M, Niimura Y, Nozawa M . The evolution of animal chemosensory receptor gene repertoires: roles of chance and necessity. Nat Rev Genet. 2008; 9(12):951-63. DOI: 10.1038/nrg2480. View

Matute D, Butler I, Coyne J . Little effect of the tan locus on pigmentation in female hybrids between Drosophila santomea and D. melanogaster. Cell. 2009; 139(6):1180-8. PMC: 2798109. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.10.033. View

10.

Qian W, He X, Chan E, Xu H, Zhang J . Measuring the evolutionary rate of protein-protein interaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108(21):8725-30. PMC: 3102417. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1104695108. View

11.

Duarte J, Wall P, Edger P, Landherr L, Ma H, Pires J . Identification of shared single copy nuclear genes in Arabidopsis, Populus, Vitis and Oryza and their phylogenetic utility across various taxonomic levels. BMC Evol Biol. 2010; 10:61. PMC: 2848037. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-10-61. View

12.

Wagner G, Zhang J . The pleiotropic structure of the genotype-phenotype map: the evolvability of complex organisms. Nat Rev Genet. 2011; 12(3):204-13. DOI: 10.1038/nrg2949. View

13.

Soskine M, Tawfik D . Mutational effects and the evolution of new protein functions. Nat Rev Genet. 2010; 11(8):572-82. DOI: 10.1038/nrg2808. View

14.

Carroll S . Evo-devo and an expanding evolutionary synthesis: a genetic theory of morphological evolution. Cell. 2008; 134(1):25-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.06.030. View

15.

Liao B, Weng M, Zhang J . Contrasting genetic paths to morphological and physiological evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107(16):7353-8. PMC: 2867737. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0910339107. View

16.

Moore R, Purugganan M . The evolutionary dynamics of plant duplicate genes. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2005; 8(2):122-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2004.12.001. View

17.

King M, Wilson A . Evolution at two levels in humans and chimpanzees. Science. 1975; 188(4184):107-16. DOI: 10.1126/science.1090005. View

18.

Rebeiz M, Ramos-Womack M, Jeong S, Andolfatto P, Werner T, True J . Evolution of the tan locus contributed to pigment loss in Drosophila santomea: a response to Matute et al. Cell. 2009; 139(6):1189-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.11.004. View

19.

Conant G, Wolfe K . Turning a hobby into a job: how duplicated genes find new functions. Nat Rev Genet. 2008; 9(12):938-50. DOI: 10.1038/nrg2482. View

20.

Keren H, Lev-Maor G, Ast G . Alternative splicing and evolution: diversification, exon definition and function. Nat Rev Genet. 2010; 11(5):345-55. DOI: 10.1038/nrg2776. View