» Articles » PMID: 22203971

Stochastic Coordination of Multiple Actuators Reduces Latency and Improves Chemotactic Response in Bacteria

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2011 Dec 29
PMID 22203971
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Individual neuronal, signal transduction, and regulatory pathways often control multiple stochastic downstream actuators, which raises the question of how coordinated response to a single input can be achieved when individual actuators fluctuate independently. In Escherichia coli, the bacterial chemotaxis pathway controls the activity of multiple flagellar motors to generate the run-and-tumble motion of the cell. High-resolution microscopy experiments have identified the key conformational changes adopted by individual flagella during this process. By incorporating these observations into a stochastic model of the flagellar bundle, we demonstrate that the presence of multiple motors imposes a trade-off on chemotactic performance. Multiple motors reduce the latency of the response below the time scale of the stochastic switching of a single motor, which improves performance on steep gradients of attractants. However, the uncoordinated switching of multiple motors interrupts and shortens cell runs, which thereby reduces signal detection and performance on shallow gradients. Remarkably, when slow fluctuations generated by the adaptation mechanism of the chemotaxis system are incorporated in the model at levels measured in experiments, the chemotactic sensitivity and performance in shallow gradients is partially restored with marginal effects for steep gradients. The noise is beneficial because it simultaneously generates long events in the statistics of individual motors and coordinates the motors to generate a long tail in the run length distribution of the cell. Occasional long runs are known to enhance exploration of random walkers. Here we show that they have the additional benefit of enhancing the sensitivity of the bacterium to very shallow gradients.

Citing Articles

Optimal Cell Length for Exploration and Exploitation in Chemotactic Planktonic Bacteria.

Guadayol O, Schuech R, Humphries S Environ Microbiol. 2024; 26(12):e70021.

PMID: 39702939 PMC: 11659635. DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.70021.


Signal integration and adaptive sensory diversity tuning in Escherichia coli chemotaxis.

Moore J, Kamino K, Kottou R, Shimizu T, Emonet T Cell Syst. 2024; 15(7):628-638.e8.

PMID: 38981486 PMC: 11307269. DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2024.06.003.


Escherichia coli chemotaxis is information limited.

Mattingly H, Kamino K, Machta B, Emonet T Nat Phys. 2022; 17(12):1426-1431.

PMID: 35035514 PMC: 8758097. DOI: 10.1038/s41567-021-01380-3.


Suppression of cell-cell variation by cooperative interaction of phosphatase and response regulator.

Liu X, Zhang R, Yuan J Biophys J. 2021; 121(2):319-326.

PMID: 34896368 PMC: 8790193. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2021.12.012.


Spatial modulation of individual behaviors enables an ordered structure of diverse phenotypes during bacterial group migration.

Bai Y, He C, Chu P, Long J, Li X, Fu X Elife. 2021; 10.

PMID: 34726151 PMC: 8563000. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.67316.


References
1.
Segall J, Manson M, Berg H . Signal processing times in bacterial chemotaxis. Nature. 1982; 296(5860):855-7. DOI: 10.1038/296855a0. View

2.
Korobkova E, Emonet T, Vilar J, Shimizu T, Cluzel P . From molecular noise to behavioural variability in a single bacterium. Nature. 2004; 428(6982):574-8. DOI: 10.1038/nature02404. View

3.
Berg H, Brown D . Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli analysed by three-dimensional tracking. Nature. 1972; 239(5374):500-4. DOI: 10.1038/239500a0. View

4.
Flores H, Lobaton E, Mendez-Diez S, Tlupova S, Cortez R . A study of bacterial flagellar bundling. Bull Math Biol. 2005; 67(1):137-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.bulm.2004.06.006. View

5.
Jiang L, Ouyang Q, Tu Y . Quantitative modeling of Escherichia coli chemotactic motion in environments varying in space and time. PLoS Comput Biol. 2010; 6(4):e1000735. PMC: 2851563. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000735. View