» Articles » PMID: 19096502

Dependence of Bacterial Chemotaxis on Gradient Shape and Adaptation Rate

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2008 Dec 20
PMID 19096502
Citations 46
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Simulation of cellular behavior on multiple scales requires models that are sufficiently detailed to capture central intracellular processes but at the same time enable the simulation of entire cell populations in a computationally cheap way. In this paper we present RapidCell, a hybrid model of chemotactic Escherichia coli that combines the Monod-Wyman-Changeux signal processing by mixed chemoreceptor clusters, the adaptation dynamics described by ordinary differential equations, and a detailed model of cell tumbling. Our model dramatically reduces computational costs and allows the highly efficient simulation of E. coli chemotaxis. We use the model to investigate chemotaxis in different gradients, and suggest a new, constant-activity type of gradient to systematically study chemotactic behavior of virtual bacteria. Using the unique properties of this gradient, we show that optimal chemotaxis is observed in a narrow range of CheA kinase activity, where concentration of the response regulator CheY-P falls into the operating range of flagellar motors. Our simulations also confirm that the CheB phosphorylation feedback improves chemotactic efficiency by shifting the average CheY-P concentration to fit the motor operating range. Our results suggest that in liquid media the variability in adaptation times among cells may be evolutionary favorable to ensure coexistence of subpopulations that will be optimally tactic in different gradients. However, in a porous medium (agar) such variability appears to be less important, because agar structure poses mainly negative selection against subpopulations with low levels of adaptation enzymes. RapidCell is available from the authors upon request.

Citing Articles

Bacterial network for precise plant stress detection and enhanced crop resilience.

Ahmed S, Naqvi S, Awais M, Ren Y, Zhang H, Wu J BMC Bioinformatics. 2025; 26(1):64.

PMID: 40000952 PMC: 11863917. DOI: 10.1186/s12859-025-06082-8.


Disentangling the feedback loops driving spatial patterning in microbial communities.

Henderson A, Del Panta A, Schubert O, Mitri S, van Vliet S NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2025; 11(1):32.

PMID: 39979272 PMC: 11842706. DOI: 10.1038/s41522-025-00666-1.


Effects of adding a kind of compound bio-enzyme to the diet on the production performance, serum immunity, and intestinal health of Pekin ducks.

Li Y, Zhou J, Guo T, Zhang H, Cao C, Cai Y Poult Sci. 2024; 104(1):104506.

PMID: 39700598 PMC: 11720614. DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2024.104506.


A Novel Device and Method for Assay of Bacterial Chemotaxis Towards Chemoattractants.

Pardeshi S, Shede P Indian J Microbiol. 2024; 64(3):990-999.

PMID: 39282202 PMC: 11399546. DOI: 10.1007/s12088-024-01194-w.


Flagellar dynamics reveal fluctuations and kinetic limit in the Escherichia coli chemotaxis network.

Bano R, Mears P, Golding I, Chemla Y Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):22891.

PMID: 38129516 PMC: 10739816. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-49784-w.


References
1.
Andrews B, Yi T, Iglesias P . Optimal noise filtering in the chemotactic response of Escherichia coli. PLoS Comput Biol. 2006; 2(11):e154. PMC: 1636674. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020154. View

2.
Berg H, Tedesco P . Transient response to chemotactic stimuli in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975; 72(8):3235-9. PMC: 432957. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.72.8.3235. View

3.
Alon U, Surette M, Barkai N, Leibler S . Robustness in bacterial chemotaxis. Nature. 1999; 397(6715):168-71. DOI: 10.1038/16483. View

4.
Kennedy M . Role of motility, chemotaxis, and adhesion in microbial ecology. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1987; 506:260-73. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1987.tb23825.x. View

5.
Kelly F, Dapsis K, Lauffenburger D . Effect of bacterial chemotaxis on dynamics of microbial competition. Microb Ecol. 2013; 16(2):115-31. DOI: 10.1007/BF02018908. View