» Articles » PMID: 22194929

Quantitative Genetics of Body Size and Timing of Maturation in Two Nine-spined Stickleback (Pungitius Pungitius) Populations

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2011 Dec 24
PMID 22194929
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Due to its influence on body size, timing of maturation is an important life-history trait in ectotherms with indeterminate growth. Comparison of patterns of growth and maturation within and between two populations (giant vs. normal sized) of nine-spined sticklebacks (Pungitius pungitius) in a breeding experiment revealed that the difference in mean adult body size between the populations is caused by differences in timing of maturation, and not by differential growth rates. The fish in small-sized population matured earlier than those from large-sized population, and maturation was accompanied by a reduction in growth rate in the small-sized population. Males matured earlier and at smaller size than females, and the fish that were immature at the end of the experiment were larger than those that had already matured. Throughout the experimental period, body size in both populations was heritable (h(2) = 0.10-0.64), as was the timing of maturation in the small-sized population (h(2) = 0.13-0.16). There was a significant positive genetic correlation between body size and timing of maturation at 140 DAH, but not earlier (at 80 or 110 DAH). Comparison of observed body size divergence between the populations revealed that Q(ST) exceeded F(ST) at older ages, indicating adaptive basis for the observed divergence. Hence, the results suggest that the body size differences within and between populations reflect heritable genetic differences in the timing of maturation, and that the observed body size divergence is adaptive.

Citing Articles

Sexual selection on male but not female function in monoecious and dioecious populations of broadleaf arrowhead ().

Kwok A, Dorken M Proc Biol Sci. 2022; 289(1986):20220919.

PMID: 36350202 PMC: 9653219. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2022.0919.


Relaxed risk of predation drives parallel evolution of stickleback behavior.

Fraimout A, Paivio E, Merila J Evolution. 2022; 76(11):2712-2723.

PMID: 36117280 PMC: 9827860. DOI: 10.1111/evo.14631.


The evolution of sex determination associated with a chromosomal inversion.

Natri H, Merila J, Shikano T Nat Commun. 2019; 10(1):145.

PMID: 30635564 PMC: 6329827. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-08014-y.


Genetic basis for body size variation between an anadromous and two derived lacustrine populations of threespine stickleback in southwest Alaska.

Bowles E, Johnston R, Vanderzwan S, Rogers S Curr Zool. 2018; 62(1):71-78.

PMID: 29491893 PMC: 5804130. DOI: 10.1093/cz/zov007.


Seasonal reproduction leads to population collapse and an Allee effect in a stage-structured consumer-resource biomass model when mortality rate increases.

Sun Z, Roos A PLoS One. 2017; 12(10):e0187338.

PMID: 29088273 PMC: 5663510. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187338.


References
1.
Shikano T, Shimada Y, Herczeg G, Merila J . History vs. habitat type: explaining the genetic structure of European nine-spined stickleback (Pungitius pungitius) populations. Mol Ecol. 2010; 19(6):1147-61. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04553.x. View

2.
Stearns S . HERITABILITY ESTIMATES FOR AGE AND LENGTH AT MATURITY IN TWO POPULATIONS OF MOSQUITOFISH THAT SHARED ANCESTORS IN 1905. Evolution. 2017; 38(2):368-375. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1984.tb00295.x. View

3.
Shikano T, Ramadevi J, Shimada Y, Merila J . Utility of sequenced genomes for microsatellite marker development in non-model organisms: a case study of functionally important genes in nine-spined sticklebacks (Pungitius pungitius). BMC Genomics. 2010; 11:334. PMC: 2891615. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-334. View

4.
Morita K, Fukuwaka M . Does size matter most? The effect of growth history on probabilistic reaction norm for salmon maturation. Evolution. 2006; 60(7):1516-21. View

5.
Merila J, Sheldon B . Genetic architecture of fitness and nonfitness traits: empirical patterns and development of ideas. Heredity (Edinb). 1999; 83 ( Pt 2):103-9. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.1999.00585.x. View