» Articles » PMID: 36350202

Sexual Selection on Male but Not Female Function in Monoecious and Dioecious Populations of Broadleaf Arrowhead ()

Overview
Journal Proc Biol Sci
Specialty Biology
Date 2022 Nov 9
PMID 36350202
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Direct measures of sexual selection in plants are rare and complicated by immobility and modular growth. For plants, instantaneous measures of fitness typically scale with size, but covariances between size and mating success could obscure the detection of sexual selection. We measured the magnitude of sexual selection in a monoecious and a dioecious population of the clonal plant using Bateman gradients (). These gradients were calculated using parentage analysis and residual regression to account for the effects of shoot and clone size on mating and reproductive success. In both populations, (i) there was greater promiscuity via male function than via female function and (ii) were positive, with significant associations between mating and reproductive success for male but not female function. Moreover, estimated were similar for the monoecious and dioecious populations, possibly because non-overlapping female and male sex phases in hermaphroditic reduced the scope for interference between sex functions during mating. This study builds on previous studies of selection on plant mating traits, and of sexual selection under experimental conditions, by showing that sexual selection can operate in natural populations of plants, including populations of hermaphrodites.

Citing Articles

Unisexual flowers as a resolution to intralocus sexual conflict in hermaphrodites.

Chen K, Pannell J Proc Biol Sci. 2023; 290(2011):20232137.

PMID: 38018108 PMC: 10685137. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2023.2137.


Influence of sexual dimorphism and dichromatism on reproductive success in a rare native cactus.

Ramadoss N, Steele S, Flores-Renteria L Oecologia. 2023; 203(3-4):383-394.

PMID: 37955714 DOI: 10.1007/s00442-023-05473-z.


Male reproductive success is not strongly affected by phenological changes in mate availability in monoecious .

Kwok A, Stephens S, Dorken M R Soc Open Sci. 2023; 10(9):231117.

PMID: 37771970 PMC: 10523072. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.231117.


Sexual selection in seaweed? Testing Bateman's principles in the red alga .

Lavaut E, Valero M, Mauger S, Guillemin M, Destombe C, Dufay M Proc Biol Sci. 2023; 290(2006):20231668.

PMID: 37700657 PMC: 10498045. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2023.1668.


Sexual selection on male but not female function in monoecious and dioecious populations of broadleaf arrowhead ().

Kwok A, Dorken M Proc Biol Sci. 2022; 289(1986):20220919.

PMID: 36350202 PMC: 9653219. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2022.0919.

References
1.
Szekely T, Reynolds J, Figuerola J . Sexual size dimorphism in shorebirds, gulls, and alcids: the influence of sexual and natural selection. Evolution. 2000; 54(4):1404-13. DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00572.x. View

2.
Moore J, Pannell J . Sexual selection in plants. Curr Biol. 2011; 21(5):R176-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.12.035. View

3.
Perry L, Dorken M . The evolution of males: support for predictions from sex allocation theory using mating arrays of sagittaria latifolia (alismataceae). Evolution. 2011; 65(10):2782-91. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01344.x. View

4.
Kwok A, Dorken M . Sexual selection on male but not female function in monoecious and dioecious populations of broadleaf arrowhead (). Proc Biol Sci. 2022; 289(1986):20220919. PMC: 9653219. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2022.0919. View

5.
Jones A, Ratterman N . Mate choice and sexual selection: what have we learned since Darwin?. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106 Suppl 1:10001-8. PMC: 2702796. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0901129106. View