» Articles » PMID: 25628860

Population Divergence in Compensatory Growth Responses and Their Costs in Sticklebacks

Overview
Journal Ecol Evol
Date 2015 Jan 29
PMID 25628860
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Compensatory growth (CG) may be an adaptive mechanism that helps to restore an organisms' growth trajectory and adult size from deviations caused by early life resource limitation. Yet, few studies have investigated the genetic basis of CG potential and existence of genetically based population differentiation in CG potential. We studied population differentiation, genetic basis, and costs of CG potential in nine-spined sticklebacks (Pungitius pungitius) differing in their normal growth patterns. As selection favors large body size in pond and small body size in marine populations, we expected CG to occur in the pond but not in the marine population. By manipulating feeding conditions (viz. high, low and recovery feeding treatments), we found clear evidence for CG in the pond but not in the marine population, as well as evidence for catch-up growth (i.e., size compensation without growth acceleration) in both populations. In the marine population, overcompensation occurred individuals from the recovery treatment grew eventually larger than those from the high feeding treatment. In both populations, the recovery feeding treatment reduced maturation probability. The recovery feeding treatment also reduced survival probability in the marine but not in the pond population. Analysis of interpopulation hybrids further suggested that both genetic and maternal effects contributed to the population differences in CG. Hence, apart from demonstrating intrinsic costs for recovery growth, both genetic and maternal effects were identified to be important modulators of CG responses. The results provide an evidence for adaptive differentiation in recovery growth potential.

Citing Articles

Pacific oysters do not compensate growth retardation following extreme acidification events.

Lutier M, Pernet F, Di Poi C Biol Lett. 2023; 19(8):20230185.

PMID: 37582403 PMC: 10427192. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2023.0185.


Growth, body condition and contest performance after early-life food restriction in a long-lived tropical fish.

Ziegelbecker A, Sefc K Ecol Evol. 2021; 11(16):10904-10916.

PMID: 34429889 PMC: 8366895. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7867.


Overcompensation of herbivore reproduction through hyper-suppression of plant defenses in response to competition.

Schimmel B, Ataide L, Chafi R, Villarroel C, Alba J, Schuurink R New Phytol. 2017; 214(4):1688-1701.

PMID: 28386959 PMC: 5434804. DOI: 10.1111/nph.14543.

References
1.
Littell R, PENDERGAST J, Natarajan R . Modelling covariance structure in the analysis of repeated measures data. Stat Med. 2000; 19(13):1793-819. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0258(20000715)19:13<1793::aid-sim482>3.0.co;2-q. View

2.
Morgan I, Metcalfe N . Deferred costs of compensatory growth after autumnal food shortage in juvenile salmon. Proc Biol Sci. 2001; 268(1464):295-301. PMC: 1088606. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1365. View

3.
Metcalfe N, Monaghan P . Compensation for a bad start: grow now, pay later?. Trends Ecol Evol. 2001; 16(5):254-260. DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02124-3. View

4.
Billerbeck J, Lankford Jr T, Conover D . Evolution of intrinsic growth and energy acquisition rates. I. Trade-offs with swimming performance in Menidia menidia. Evolution. 2001; 55(9):1863-72. DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00835.x. View

5.
Metcalfe N, Monaghan P . Growth versus lifespan: perspectives from evolutionary ecology. Exp Gerontol. 2003; 38(9):935-40. DOI: 10.1016/s0531-5565(03)00159-1. View