Bilingual Recognition Memory: Stronger Performance but Weaker Levels-of-processing Effects in the Less Fluent Language

Overview

Journal Mem Cognit

Specialty Psychology

Date 2011 Nov 17

PMID 22086650

Citations 13

Authors

Wendy S Francis

Marisela Gutierrez

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The effects of bilingual proficiency on recognition memory were examined in an experiment with Spanish-English bilinguals. Participants learned lists of words in English and Spanish under shallow- and deep-encoding conditions. Overall, hit rates were higher, discrimination greater, and response times shorter in the nondominant language, consistent with effects previously observed for lower frequency words. Levels-of-processing effects in hit rates, discrimination, and response time were stronger in the dominant language. Specifically, with shallow encoding, the advantage for the nondominant language was larger than with deep encoding. The results support the idea that memory performance in the nondominant language is impacted by both the greater demand for cognitive resources and the lower familiarity of the words.

Citing Articles

Embodied cognition and L2 sentence comprehension: an eye-tracking study of motor representations.

Shiang R, Chern C, Chen H Front Hum Neurosci. 2024; 18:1410242.

PMID: 39381143 PMC: 11459642. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1410242.

The role of speech style, frequency, and density in recognition memory for spoken words.

Pycha A, Culleton T, Song J Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1277624.

PMID: 38328381 PMC: 10847305. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1277624.

Judgments of learning in bilinguals: Does studying in a L2 hinder learning monitoring?.

Reyes M, Morales M, Bajo M PLoS One. 2023; 18(12):e0286516.

PMID: 38039293 PMC: 10691729. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286516.

Rethinking Bilingual Enhancement Effects in Associative Learning of Foreign Language Vocabulary: The Role of Proficiency in the Mediating Language.

Tsuboi N, Francis W J Mem Lang. 2023; 115.

PMID: 37920608 PMC: 10621672. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2020.104155.

Measurement of prospective memory in Spanish speakers.

Cadavid L, Camuy A, Velez V, Raskin S Front Hum Neurosci. 2023; 17:1126039.

PMID: 37200950 PMC: 10185759. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1126039.

References

Macleod C, Kampe K . Word frequency effects on recall, recognition, and word fragment completion tests. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1996; 22(1):132-42. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.22.1.132. View

Craik F, Guez J, Dori H . Effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory: further support for an asymmetry. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1998; 24(5):1091-104. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.24.5.1091. View

Francis W, Augustini B, Saenz S . Repetition priming in picture naming and translation depends on shared processes and their difficulty: evidence from spanish-english bilinguals. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003; 29(6):1283-97. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.6.1283. View

Duchek J, Neely J . A dissociative word-frequency X levels-of-processing interaction in episodic recognition and lexical decision tasks. Mem Cognit. 1989; 17(2):148-62. DOI: 10.3758/bf03197065. View

Craik F . Levels of processing: past, present. and future?. Memory. 2002; 10(5-6):305-18. DOI: 10.1080/09658210244000135. View

Craik F, Ishaik G, Anderson N . Divided attention during encoding and retrieval: differential control effects?. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001; 26(6):1744-9. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.26.6.1744. View

Diana R, Reder L . The low-frequency encoding disadvantage: Word frequency affects processing demands. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006; 32(4):805-15. PMC: 2387211. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.4.805. View

Francis W . Cognitive integration of language and memory in bilinguals: semantic representation. Psychol Bull. 1999; 125(2):193-222. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.193. View

Craik F, Perretta J, Tonev S . The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: the resiliency of retrieval processes. Q J Exp Psychol A. 2000; 53(3):609-25. DOI: 10.1080/713755914. View

10.

Francis W, Gallard S . Concept mediation in trilingual translation: evidence from response time and repetition priming patterns. Psychon Bull Rev. 2006; 12(6):1082-8. DOI: 10.3758/bf03206447. View

11.

Gollan T, Montoya R, Cera C, Sandoval T . More use almost always a means a smaller frequency effect: Aging, bilingualism, and the weaker links hypothesis. J Mem Lang. 2009; 58(3):787-814. PMC: 2409197. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.07.001. View

12.

Mandler G, Goodman G . The word-frequency paradox in recognition. Mem Cognit. 1982; 10(1):33-42. DOI: 10.3758/bf03197623. View

13.

Hicks J, Marsh R . Toward specifying the attentional demands of recognition memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001; 26(6):1483-98. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.26.6.1483. View

14.

Troyer A, Craik F . The effect of divided attention on memory for items and their context. Can J Exp Psychol. 2000; 54(3):161-71. DOI: 10.1037/h0087338. View

15.

Ardila A . Language representation and working memory with bilinguals. J Commun Disord. 2003; 36(3):233-40. DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9924(03)00022-4. View

16.

Francis W, Goldmann L . Repetition priming within and between languages in semantic classification of concrete and abstract words. Memory. 2011; 19(6):653-63. DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2011.595724. View