» Articles » PMID: 37920608

Rethinking Bilingual Enhancement Effects in Associative Learning of Foreign Language Vocabulary: The Role of Proficiency in the Mediating Language

Overview
Journal J Mem Lang
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2023 Nov 3
PMID 37920608
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The present study investigated claims that learning vocabulary in an unfamiliar language is more efficient in bilinguals than in monolinguals and the possible effects of language proficiency and dominance. In Experiment 1, monolingual ( = 48) and bilingual participants ( = 96) learned Japanese words paired with English translations and completed cued-recall and associative-recognition tests. Accuracy did not differ across monolingual and bilingual or language dominance groups. Nevertheless, in bilinguals, higher English proficiency was associated with higher accuracy. In Experiment 2, Japanese-English bilinguals ( = 40) learned Spanish-Japanese word pairs, and higher Japanese proficiency was associated with higher accuracy. Associative strategies were reported at a higher rate in bilingual than in monolingual participants but were not associated with more accurate performance. Careful comparisons of the present and previous results support the conclusion that higher proficiency in the language through which bilinguals learn foreign vocabulary enhances associative memory, but bilingualism itself does not.

Citing Articles

The role of bilingualism in paired-associate and cross-situational word learning.

Neveu A, Kaushanskaya M Biling (Camb Engl). 2024; 27(1):41-56.

PMID: 38268553 PMC: 10805387. DOI: 10.1017/s1366728923000524.

References
1.
Brysbaert M, New B . Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: a critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behav Res Methods. 2009; 41(4):977-90. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.977. View

2.
Papagno C, Vallar G . Verbal short-term memory and vocabulary learning in polyglots. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1995; 48(1):98-107. DOI: 10.1080/14640749508401378. View

3.
Francis W, Gutierrez M . Bilingual recognition memory: stronger performance but weaker levels-of-processing effects in the less fluent language. Mem Cognit. 2011; 40(3):496-503. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-011-0163-3. View

4.
Fernandes M, Craik F, Bialystok E, Kreuger S . Effects of bilingualism, aging, and semantic relatedness on memory under divided attention. Can J Exp Psychol. 2007; 61(2):128-41. DOI: 10.1037/cjep2007014. View

5.
Bice K, Kroll J . English only? Monolinguals in linguistically diverse contexts have an edge in language learning. Brain Lang. 2019; 196:104644. PMC: 7011168. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2019.104644. View