» Articles » PMID: 22083214

Noninvasive Studies of Central Aortic Pressure

Overview
Date 2011 Nov 16
PMID 22083214
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Our purpose is to review noninvasive methods for measuring central arterial pressure. Indices of central arterial pressure measured from central aortic and peripheral arterial waveforms have shown value in predicting cardiovascular events and death, as well as in guiding therapeutic management. This article reviews noninvasive techniques of measuring central arterial pressure that have been validated against intra-arterial pressure. This paper explains methods to derive central (aortic and carotid) pressure from radial and brachial sites. It focuses on specific issues of brachial calibration applied to carotid pressure waveforms, which were regarded as a surrogate of aortic pressures used in three major studies (Framingham, Asklepios, and Australian National Blood Pressure 2 studies). We explain why radial-based methods are superior to carotid-based methods for estimating central pressure. Physiological principles of pressure measurement need be satisfied to ensure accurate recording.

Citing Articles

Estimation of central blood pressure waveform from femoral blood pressure waveform by blind sources separation.

Gbaoui L, Hoeschen C, Kaniusas E, Khatib S, Gretschel S, Wellnhofer E Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023; 10:1280899.

PMID: 38045918 PMC: 10690369. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1280899.


Oscillometric pulse wave analysis for detecting low flow arteriovenous fistula.

Busch V, Streis J, Muller S, Mueller N, Seibert F, Felderhoff T BMC Nephrol. 2023; 24(1):186.

PMID: 37355570 PMC: 10290325. DOI: 10.1186/s12882-023-03243-w.


Vascular Aging and Arterial Stiffness.

Oliveira A, Cunha P, Vitorino P, Souza A, Deus G, Feitosa A Arq Bras Cardiol. 2022; 119(4):604-615.

PMID: 36287415 PMC: 9563886. DOI: 10.36660/abc.20210708.


Factors That May Impact the Noninvasive Measurement of Central Blood Pressure Compared to Invasive Measurement: The MATCHY Study.

Chi C, Lu Y, Zhou Y, Li J, Xu Y, Zhang Y J Pers Med. 2022; 12(9).

PMID: 36143267 PMC: 9505856. DOI: 10.3390/jpm12091482.


Carotid Pulse Wave Analysis: Future Direction of Hemodynamic and Cardiovascular Risk Assessment.

Parittotokkaporn S, de Castro D, Lowe A, Pylypchuk R JMA J. 2021; 4(2):119-128.

PMID: 33997445 PMC: 8119021. DOI: 10.31662/jmaj.2020-0108.


References
1.
Cameron J . Assessment of central blood pressure waveforms--let the buyer beware: different approaches result in different results. Hypertens Res. 2011; 34(9):994-5. DOI: 10.1038/hr.2011.106. View

2.
Smulyan H, Siddiqui D, Carlson R, London G, Safar M . Clinical utility of aortic pulses and pressures calculated from applanated radial-artery pulses. Hypertension. 2003; 42(2):150-5. DOI: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000084051.34269.A9. View

3.
Mitchell G, Gudnason V, Launer L, Aspelund T, Harris T . Hemodynamics of increased pulse pressure in older women in the community-based Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility-Reykjavik Study. Hypertension. 2008; 51(4):1123-8. PMC: 11106724. DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.108175. View

4.
Hashimoto J, Imai Y, ORourke M . Indices of pulse wave analysis are better predictors of left ventricular mass reduction than cuff pressure. Am J Hypertens. 2007; 20(4):378-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2006.09.019. View

5.
Chen C, Nevo E, Fetics B, Pak P, Yin F, Maughan W . Estimation of central aortic pressure waveform by mathematical transformation of radial tonometry pressure. Validation of generalized transfer function. Circulation. 1997; 95(7):1827-36. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.95.7.1827. View