» Articles » PMID: 22010200

Comparison of Composite Measure Methodologies for Rewarding Quality of Care: an Analysis from the American Heart Association's Get With The Guidelines Program

Overview
Date 2011 Oct 20
PMID 22010200
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Composite indices of health care performance are an aggregation of underlying individual performance measures and are increasingly being used to rank hospitals. We sought to conduct an observational analysis to determine the influence of the opportunity-based and all-or-none composite performance measures on hospital rankings.

Methods And Results: We examined 194 245 patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction between July 2006 and June 2009 from 334 hospitals participating in the Get With The Guidelines--Coronary Artery Disease (GWTG-CAD) quality improvement program. We analyzed hospital opportunity-based and all-or-none composite scores and 30-day risk-standardized all-cause mortality and readmission rates. We found that the median calculated opportunity-based score for these hospitals was 95.5 (interquartile range, 90.4, 98.0). The median all-or-none score was 88.9 (interquartile range, 79.7, 94.4). The 2 scoring methods were significantly correlated with one another (r=0.98, P<0.001). Rankings generated by the two methods were significantly correlated (r=0.93, P<0.001). The two methods had a modest correlation with the 30-day risk-standardized mortality rate (opportunity-based score: r=-0.25, P<0.001; all-or-none score: r=-0.24, P<0.001). Neither composite measure correlated with the 30-day risk-standardized readmission rate. Over time, the number of hospitals new to the top and bottom quintiles of hospital rankings diminished similarly for both composite measures. When including additional performance measures into the composite score, the two methods produced similar changes in hospital rankings.

Conclusions: The opportunity-based and all-or-none coronary artery disease composite indices are highly correlated and yield similar ranking of the top and bottom quintiles of hospitals. The two methods provide similarly modest correlations with 30-day mortality, but not readmission.

Citing Articles

A composite measure for patient-reported outcomes in orthopedic care: design principles and validity checks.

Schoner L, Kuklinski D, Geissler A, Busse R, Pross C Qual Life Res. 2023; 32(8):2341-2351.

PMID: 36964454 PMC: 10329084. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-023-03395-0.


Handling missing data in a composite outcome with partially observed components: simulation study based on clustered paediatric routine data.

Gachau S, Njagi E, Owuor N, Mwaniki P, Quartagno M, Sarguta R J Appl Stat. 2022; 49(9):2389-2402.

PMID: 35755090 PMC: 9225614. DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2021.1895087.


Use of Guideline-Based Therapy for Diabetes, Coronary Artery Disease, and Chronic Kidney Disease After Acute Kidney Injury: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Madan S, Norman P, Wald R, Neyra J, Meraz-Munoz A, Harel Z Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2022; 9:20543581221103682.

PMID: 35721395 PMC: 9201307. DOI: 10.1177/20543581221103682.


Composite measures of quality of health care: Evidence mapping of methodology and reporting.

Kara P, Valentin J, Mainz J, Johnsen S PLoS One. 2022; 17(5):e0268320.

PMID: 35552561 PMC: 9098058. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268320.


Implementation of a Best Practice in Cardiology (BPC) Program Adapted from Get With The Guidelines®in Brazilian Public Hospitals: Study Design and Rationale.

Taniguchi F, Bernardez-Pereira S, Silva S, Ribeiro A, Morgan L, Curtis A Arq Bras Cardiol. 2020; 115(1):92-99.

PMID: 32187286 PMC: 8384317. DOI: 10.36660/abc.20190393.