» Articles » PMID: 27437652

Association Between Hospital Process Composite Performance and Patient Outcomes After In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Care

Overview
Journal JAMA Cardiol
Date 2016 Jul 21
PMID 27437652
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Importance: Survival rates after in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) vary significantly among US centers; whether this variation is owing to differences in IHCA care quality is unknown.

Objective: To evaluate hospital-level variation to determine whether hospital process composite performance measures of IHCA care quality are associated with patient outcomes.

Design, Setting, And Participants: Using data from the American Heart Association's Get With the Guidelines-Resuscitation (GWTG-R) program, we analyzed 35 283 patients 18 years or older with IHCA treated at 261 US hospitals from January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2012. We calculated the hospital process composite performance score for IHCA using 5 guideline-recommended process measures. Opportunity-based scores were calculated for all patients, aggregated at the hospital level, divided into quartiles, and then associated with risk-standardized survival and neurologic status by a test for trend. The scores were then evaluated through hierarchical logistic regression and reported as odds ratios per 10% increment in hospital process composite performance.

Interventions: Acute care treatments for IHCA.

Main Outcomes And Measures: The primary outcome was survival to discharge measured as risk standard survival rates, and the secondary outcome was favorable neurologic status at hospital discharge.

Results: Of the 35 283 adults included in this study, the median age was 67 years (interquartile range [IQR] 56-78 years), and 57.9% were male. The median IHCA hospital process composite performance was 89.7% (interquartile range, 85.4%-93.1%) and varied among hospital quartiles from 82.6% (lowest) to 94.8% (highest). The IHCA hospital process composite performance was linearly associated with risk-standardized hospital survival to discharge rates: 21.1%, 21.4%, 22.8%, and 23.4% from lowest to highest performance quartiles, respectively (P < .001). After adjustment, each 10% increase in a hospital's process composite performance was associated with a 22% higher odds of survival (adjusted odds ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.08-1.37; P = .01). Hospital process composite quality performance was also associated with favorable neurologic status at discharge (P = .004).

Conclusions And Relevance: The quality of guideline-based care for IHCA varies significantly among US hospitals and is associated with patient survival and neurologic outcomes.

Citing Articles

Exploring effects of a booster workshop on progression and retention of resuscitation skills of residents when added to regular low-dose simulation.

Chen H, Tsai H, Chen Y, Chiu Y, Kang E, Hsu Y BMC Med Educ. 2025; 25(1):85.

PMID: 39833881 PMC: 11744814. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-025-06705-x.


Correlation between hospital rates of survival to discharge and long-term survival for in-hospital cardiac arrest: Insights from Get With The Guidelines®-Resuscitation registry.

Khera R, Aminorroaya A, Kennedy K, Chan P Resuscitation. 2024; 202:110322.

PMID: 39029583 PMC: 11390317. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110322.


Benchmarking System Monitoring on Quality Improvement in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Nationwide Registry in Japan.

Saito Y, Inohara T, Kohsaka S, Wada H, Kumamaru H, Yamaji K JACC Asia. 2024; 4(4):323-331.

PMID: 38660107 PMC: 11035937. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2023.12.003.


Recovery and Survival of Patients After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Literature Review Showcasing the Big Picture of Intensive Care Unit-Related Factors.

Nikolovski S, Lazic A, Fiser Z, Obradovic I, Tijanic J, Raffay V Cureus. 2024; 16(2):e54827.

PMID: 38529434 PMC: 10962929. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.54827.


Outcomes in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction complicated by in-hospital cardiac arrest based on management strategy.

Verghese D, Bhat A, Patlolla S, Naidu S, Basir M, Cubeddu R Indian Heart J. 2023; 75(6):443-450.

PMID: 37863393 PMC: 10774581. DOI: 10.1016/j.ihj.2023.10.004.


References
1.
Peberdy M, Kaye W, Ornato J, Larkin G, Nadkarni V, Mancini M . Cardiopulmonary resuscitation of adults in the hospital: a report of 14720 cardiac arrests from the National Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2003; 58(3):297-308. DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9572(03)00215-6. View

2.
Peterson E, Roe M, Mulgund J, DeLong E, Lytle B, Brindis R . Association between hospital process performance and outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndromes. JAMA. 2006; 295(16):1912-20. DOI: 10.1001/jama.295.16.1912. View

3.
Chan P, Krumholz H, Nichol G, Nallamothu B . Delayed time to defibrillation after in-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358(1):9-17. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0706467. View

4.
Peberdy M, Ornato J, Larkin G, Braithwaite R, Kashner T, Carey S . Survival from in-hospital cardiac arrest during nights and weekends. JAMA. 2008; 299(7):785-92. DOI: 10.1001/jama.299.7.785. View

5.
OBrien S, DeLong E, Peterson E . Impact of case volume on hospital performance assessment. Arch Intern Med. 2008; 168(12):1277-84. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.168.12.1277. View