Composite Measures of Quality of Health Care: Evidence Mapping of Methodology and Reporting
Overview
Affiliations
Background: Quality indicators are used to quantify the quality of care. A large number of quality indicators makes assessment of overall quality difficult, time consuming and impractical. There is consequently an increasing interest for composite measures based on a combination of multiple indicators.
Objective: To examine the use of different approaches to construct composite measures of quality of care and to assess the use of methodological considerations and justifications.
Methods: We conducted a literature search on PubMed and EMBASE databases (latest update 1 December 2020). For each publication, we extracted information on the weighting and aggregation methodology that had been used to construct composite indicator(s).
Results: A total of 2711 publications were identified of which 145 were included after a screening process. Opportunity scoring with equal weights was the most used approach (86/145, 59%) followed by all-or-none scoring (48/145, 33%). Other approaches regarding aggregation or weighting of individual indicators were used in 32 publications (22%). The rationale for selecting a specific type of composite measure was reported in 36 publications (25%), whereas 22 papers (15%) addressed limitations regarding the composite measure.
Conclusion: Opportunity scoring and all-or-none scoring are the most frequently used approaches when constructing composite measures of quality of care. The attention towards the rationale and limitations of the composite measures appears low.
Discussion: Considering the widespread use and the potential implications for decision-making of composite measures, a high level of transparency regarding the construction process of the composite and the functionality of the measures is crucial.
A Composite Indicator for Primary Diabetes Care: A Cross-Sectional Study in Hungary.
Jargalsaikhan U, Kasabji F, Vincze F, Palinkas A, Korosi L, Sandor J Healthcare (Basel). 2025; 13(5).
PMID: 40077042 PMC: 11898904. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare13050480.
Jager L, Markun S, Grischott T, Senn O, Rosemann T, Burgstaller J PLoS One. 2024; 19(11):e0314360.
PMID: 39570965 PMC: 11581287. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314360.
Guldhav K, Andersen J, Eldal K, Lundeby T, Hegland P Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2024; 15:271-286.
PMID: 39534014 PMC: 11556242. DOI: 10.2147/PROM.S479195.
Vidoli F, Pignataro G, Battiato S, Guarnera F, Guccio C Health Econ Rev. 2024; 14(1):83.
PMID: 39365504 PMC: 11452975. DOI: 10.1186/s13561-024-00559-7.
Liu M, Guo R, Li J, Wang C, Yu L, Liu M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):19137.
PMID: 39160221 PMC: 11333708. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-70474-8.