» Articles » PMID: 21813756

Urine TMPRSS2:ERG Fusion Transcript Stratifies Prostate Cancer Risk in Men with Elevated Serum PSA

Abstract

More than 1,000,000 men undergo prostate biopsy each year in the United States, most for "elevated" serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA). Given the lack of specificity and unclear mortality benefit of PSA testing, methods to individualize management of elevated PSA are needed. Greater than 50% of PSA-screened prostate cancers harbor fusions between the transmembrane protease, serine 2 (TMPRSS2) and v-ets erythroblastosis virus E26 oncogene homolog (avian) (ERG) genes. Here, we report a clinical-grade, transcription-mediated amplification assay to risk stratify and detect prostate cancer noninvasively in urine. The TMPRSS2:ERG fusion transcript was quantitatively measured in prospectively collected whole urine from 1312 men at multiple centers. Urine TMPRSS2:ERG was associated with indicators of clinically significant cancer at biopsy and prostatectomy, including tumor size, high Gleason score at prostatectomy, and upgrading of Gleason grade at prostatectomy. TMPRSS2:ERG, in combination with urine prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3), improved the performance of the multivariate Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator in predicting cancer on biopsy. In the biopsy cohorts, men in the highest and lowest of three TMPRSS2:ERG+PCA3 score groups had markedly different rates of cancer, clinically significant cancer by Epstein criteria, and high-grade cancer on biopsy. Our results demonstrate that urine TMPRSS2:ERG, in combination with urine PCA3, enhances the utility of serum PSA for predicting prostate cancer risk and clinically relevant cancer on biopsy.

Citing Articles

Recent Electrochemical Advancements for Liquid-Biopsy Nucleic Acid Detection for Point-of-Care Prostate Cancer Diagnostics and Prognostics.

Broomfield J, Kalofonou M, Bevan C, Georgiou P Biosensors (Basel). 2024; 14(9).

PMID: 39329818 PMC: 11430765. DOI: 10.3390/bios14090443.


Nurturing the marriages of urinary liquid biopsies and nano-diagnostics for precision urinalysis of prostate cancer.

Liao C, Wu Z, Lin C, Chen X, Zou Y, Zhao W Smart Med. 2024; 2(1):e20220020.

PMID: 39188554 PMC: 11236013. DOI: 10.1002/SMMD.20220020.


Immunotherapies targeting the oncogenic fusion gene CLDN18-ARHGAP in gastric cancer.

Wang Y, Wang H, Shi T, Song X, Zhang X, Zhang Y EMBO Mol Med. 2024; 16(9):2170-2187.

PMID: 39164472 PMC: 11393071. DOI: 10.1038/s44321-024-00120-3.


National Cancer Institute's early detection research network: a model organization for biomarker research.

Wagner P, Srivastava S J Natl Cancer Cent. 2024; 3(2):93-99.

PMID: 39035726 PMC: 11256707. DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2023.05.002.


Liquid Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Current Status and Emerging Prospects.

Liu Y, Hatano K, Nonomura N World J Mens Health. 2024; 43(1):8-27.

PMID: 38772530 PMC: 11704174. DOI: 10.5534/wjmh.230386.


References
1.
Deras I, Aubin S, Blase A, Day J, Koo S, Partin A . PCA3: a molecular urine assay for predicting prostate biopsy outcome. J Urol. 2008; 179(4):1587-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.11.038. View

2.
Shariat S, Karakiewicz P, Roehrborn C, Kattan M . An updated catalog of prostate cancer predictive tools. Cancer. 2008; 113(11):3075-99. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.23908. View

3.
Strope S, Andriole G . Prostate cancer screening: current status and future perspectives. Nat Rev Urol. 2010; 7(9):487-93. DOI: 10.1038/nrurol.2010.120. View

4.
Draisma G, Etzioni R, Tsodikov A, Mariotto A, Wever E, Gulati R . Lead time and overdiagnosis in prostate-specific antigen screening: importance of methods and context. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009; 101(6):374-83. PMC: 2720697. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djp001. View

5.
Mosquera J, Perner S, Genega E, Sanda M, Hofer M, Mertz K . Characterization of TMPRSS2-ERG fusion high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and potential clinical implications. Clin Cancer Res. 2008; 14(11):3380-5. PMC: 3717517. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-5194. View