Characterization of TMPRSS2-ERG Fusion High-grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Potential Clinical Implications
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Purpose: More than 1,300,000 prostate needle biopsies are done annually in the United States with up to 16% incidence of isolated high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN). HGPIN has low predictive value for identifying prostate cancer on subsequent needle biopsies in prostate-specific antigen-screened populations. In contemporary series, prostate cancer is detected in approximately 20% of repeat biopsies following a diagnosis of HGPIN. Further, discrete histologic subtypes of HGPIN with clinical implication in management have not been characterized. The TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusion that has recently been described in prostate cancer has also been shown to occur in a subset of HGPIN. This may have significant clinical implications given that TMPRSS2-ERG fusion prostate cancer is associated with a more aggressive clinical course.
Experimental Design: In this study, we assessed a series of HGPIN lesions and paired prostate cancer for the presence of TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusion.
Results: Fusion-positive HGPIN was observed in 16% of the 143 number of lesions, and in all instances, the matching cancer shared the same fusion pattern. Sixty percent of TMPRSS2-ERG fusion prostate cancer had fusion-negative HGPIN.
Conclusions: Given the more aggressive nature of TMPRSS2-ERG prostate cancer, the findings of this study raise the possibility that gene fusion-positive HGPIN lesions are harbingers of more aggressive disease. To date, pathologic, molecular, and clinical variables do not help stratify which men with HGPIN are at increased risk for a cancer diagnosis. Our results suggest that the detection of isolated TMPRSS2-ERG fusion HGPIN would improve the positive predictive value of finding TMPRSS2-ERG fusion prostate cancer in subsequent biopsies.
From microscopes to molecules: The evolution of prostate cancer diagnostics.
Tao J, Bian X, Zhou J, Zhang M Cytojournal. 2024; 21:29.
PMID: 39391208 PMC: 11464998. DOI: 10.25259/Cytojournal_36_2024.
Teoman G, Livaoglu A, Kucuk H, Murtezaoglu A J Pathol Transl Med. 2024; 58(3):134-140.
PMID: 38766739 PMC: 11106607. DOI: 10.4132/jptm.2024.03.18.
Mitala Y, Ssenkumba B, Birungi A, Kiconco R, Mutakooha M, Atwine R Diagn Pathol. 2024; 19(1):67.
PMID: 38730435 PMC: 11084131. DOI: 10.1186/s13000-024-01494-1.
Guo C, Czerniak B J Clin Transl Pathol. 2024; 3(1):26-34.
PMID: 38605939 PMC: 11007763. DOI: 10.14218/jctp.2022.00029.
Feng W, Ladewig E, Salsabeel N, Zhao H, Lee Y, Gopalan A bioRxiv. 2024; .
PMID: 38585869 PMC: 10996491. DOI: 10.1101/2023.05.15.540839.