» Articles » PMID: 18519767

Characterization of TMPRSS2-ERG Fusion High-grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Potential Clinical Implications

Overview
Journal Clin Cancer Res
Specialty Oncology
Date 2008 Jun 4
PMID 18519767
Citations 93
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: More than 1,300,000 prostate needle biopsies are done annually in the United States with up to 16% incidence of isolated high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN). HGPIN has low predictive value for identifying prostate cancer on subsequent needle biopsies in prostate-specific antigen-screened populations. In contemporary series, prostate cancer is detected in approximately 20% of repeat biopsies following a diagnosis of HGPIN. Further, discrete histologic subtypes of HGPIN with clinical implication in management have not been characterized. The TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusion that has recently been described in prostate cancer has also been shown to occur in a subset of HGPIN. This may have significant clinical implications given that TMPRSS2-ERG fusion prostate cancer is associated with a more aggressive clinical course.

Experimental Design: In this study, we assessed a series of HGPIN lesions and paired prostate cancer for the presence of TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusion.

Results: Fusion-positive HGPIN was observed in 16% of the 143 number of lesions, and in all instances, the matching cancer shared the same fusion pattern. Sixty percent of TMPRSS2-ERG fusion prostate cancer had fusion-negative HGPIN.

Conclusions: Given the more aggressive nature of TMPRSS2-ERG prostate cancer, the findings of this study raise the possibility that gene fusion-positive HGPIN lesions are harbingers of more aggressive disease. To date, pathologic, molecular, and clinical variables do not help stratify which men with HGPIN are at increased risk for a cancer diagnosis. Our results suggest that the detection of isolated TMPRSS2-ERG fusion HGPIN would improve the positive predictive value of finding TMPRSS2-ERG fusion prostate cancer in subsequent biopsies.

Citing Articles

From microscopes to molecules: The evolution of prostate cancer diagnostics.

Tao J, Bian X, Zhou J, Zhang M Cytojournal. 2024; 21:29.

PMID: 39391208 PMC: 11464998. DOI: 10.25259/Cytojournal_36_2024.


The importance of histomorphological features and ERG expression in the diagnosis of malignancy in cases with atypical small acinar proliferation.

Teoman G, Livaoglu A, Kucuk H, Murtezaoglu A J Pathol Transl Med. 2024; 58(3):134-140.

PMID: 38766739 PMC: 11106607. DOI: 10.4132/jptm.2024.03.18.


A cross-sectional study of ERG expression and the relationship with clinicopathological features of Prostate cancer in Southwestern Uganda.

Mitala Y, Ssenkumba B, Birungi A, Kiconco R, Mutakooha M, Atwine R Diagn Pathol. 2024; 19(1):67.

PMID: 38730435 PMC: 11084131. DOI: 10.1186/s13000-024-01494-1.


Updates of Prostate Cancer from the 2022 World Health Organization Classification of the Urinary and Male Genital Tumors.

Guo C, Czerniak B J Clin Transl Pathol. 2024; 3(1):26-34.

PMID: 38605939 PMC: 11007763. DOI: 10.14218/jctp.2022.00029.


ERG activates a stem-like proliferation-differentiation program in prostate epithelial cells with mixed basal-luminal identity.

Feng W, Ladewig E, Salsabeel N, Zhao H, Lee Y, Gopalan A bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38585869 PMC: 10996491. DOI: 10.1101/2023.05.15.540839.


References
1.
Ananthanarayanan V, Deaton R, Yang X, Pins M, Gann P . Alteration of proliferation and apoptotic markers in normal and premalignant tissue associated with prostate cancer. BMC Cancer. 2006; 6:73. PMC: 1448200. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-6-73. View

2.
Qian J, Bostwick D, Takahashi S, Borell T, Herath J, Lieber M . Chromosomal anomalies in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and carcinoma detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Cancer Res. 1995; 55(22):5408-14. View

3.
Aboseif S, Shinohara K, Weidner N, Narayan P, Carroll P . The significance of prostatic intra-epithelial neoplasia. Br J Urol. 1995; 76(3):355-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1995.tb07714.x. View

4.
Bostwick D, Shan A, Qian J, Darson M, Maihle N, Jenkins R . Independent origin of multiple foci of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: comparison with matched foci of prostate carcinoma. Cancer. 1998; 83(9):1995-2002. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19981101)83:9<1995::aid-cncr16>3.0.co;2-2. View

5.
Mehra R, Tomlins S, Shen R, Nadeem O, Wang L, Wei J . Comprehensive assessment of TMPRSS2 and ETS family gene aberrations in clinically localized prostate cancer. Mod Pathol. 2007; 20(5):538-44. DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.3800769. View