Comparison of the Efficacies of Loop-mediated Isothermal Amplification, Fluorescence Smear Microscopy and Culture for the Diagnosis of Tuberculosis

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2011 Jun 23

PMID 21695047

Citations 20

Authors

Geojith George

Prem Mony

John Kenneth

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Despite the advent of novel diagnostic techniques, smear microscopy remains as the most practical test available in resource-limited settings for tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis. Due to the low sensitivity of microscopy and the long time required for culture, feasible and accessible rapid diagnostic methods are urgently needed. Loop-mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) is a promising nucleic-acid amplification assay, which could be accessible, cost-effective and more suited for use with unpurified samples.

Methodology/principal Findings: In the current study, the objective was to assess the efficacy of a LAMP assay for tuberculosis compared with fluorescence smear microscopy as well as Löwenstein-Jensen (LJ) and Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) cultures for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis using sputum samples. Smear microscopy and culture were performed for decontaminated and concentrated sputum from TB suspects and the LAMP was also performed on these specimens. The LAMP and smear microscopy were compared, in series and in parallel, to culture. LAMP and smear microscopy showed sensitivities of 79.5% and 82.1% respectively and specificities of 93.8% and 96.9% respectively, compared to culture. LAMP and smear in series had sensitivity and specificity of 79.5% and 100.0% respectively. LAMP and smear in parallel had sensitivity and specificity of 82.1% and 90.6% respectively.

Conclusions/significance: The overall efficacies of LAMP and fluorescence smear microscopy in the current study were high and broadly similar. LAMP and smear in series had high specificity (100.0%) and can be used as a rule-in test combination. However, the performance of LAMP in smear negative samples was found to be insufficient.

Citing Articles

Association Between Indices of Peripheral Blood Inflammation and Cavitary Pulmonary Tuberculosis.

He X, Hou H, Jiang Y, Huang X Int J Gen Med. 2024; 17:5133-5142.

PMID: 39529941 PMC: 11552384. DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S483185.

Pragmatic accuracy of an in-house loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in a Thai community hospital.

Toonkomdang S, Phinyo P, Phetsuksiri B, Patumanond J, Rudeeaneksin J, Klayut W PLoS One. 2020; 15(7):e0236496.

PMID: 32702008 PMC: 7377475. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236496.

Species-specific loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay for identification of tissue of cattle origin by targeting mitochondrial gene sequences.

Kumari S, Kumar R, Mendiratta S, Kumar D, Rana P, Kumar D 3 Biotech. 2019; 9(3):69.

PMID: 30729093 PMC: 6363609. DOI: 10.1007/s13205-019-1595-x.

Detection of microcystin-producing cyanobacteria in water samples using loop-mediated isothermal amplification targeting gene.

Ramya M, Kayalvizhi M, Haripriya G, Rathinasabapathi P 3 Biotech. 2018; 8(9):378.

PMID: 30148028 PMC: 6097961. DOI: 10.1007/s13205-018-1402-0.

Smear Microscopy for Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Eastern Sudan.

Shuaib Y, Khalil E, Schaible U, Wieler L, Bakheit M, Mohamed-Noor S Tuberc Res Treat. 2018; 2018:8038137.

PMID: 30013800 PMC: 6022320. DOI: 10.1155/2018/8038137.

References

Dowdy D, OBrien M, Bishai D . Cost-effectiveness of novel diagnostic tools for the diagnosis of tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2008; 12(9):1021-9. View

Lee J, Kim E, Joo S, Lee S, Yoo C, Kim Y . The incidence and clinical implication of sputum with positive acid-fast bacilli smear but negative in mycobacterial culture in a tertiary referral hospital in South Korea. J Korean Med Sci. 2008; 23(5):767-71. PMC: 2580011. DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2008.23.5.767. View

Campos M, Quartin A, Mendes E, Abreu A, Gurevich S, Echarte L . Feasibility of shortening respiratory isolation with a single sputum nucleic acid amplification test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008; 178(3):300-5. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200803-381OC. View

Boehme C, Nabeta P, Henostroza G, Raqib R, Rahim Z, Gerhardt M . Operational feasibility of using loop-mediated isothermal amplification for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in microscopy centers of developing countries. J Clin Microbiol. 2007; 45(6):1936-40. PMC: 1933042. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02352-06. View

Sreeramareddy C, Panduru K, Menten J, van den Ende J . Time delays in diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review of literature. BMC Infect Dis. 2009; 9:91. PMC: 2702369. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-9-91. View

Neonakis I, Gitti Z, Krambovitis E, Spandidos D . Molecular diagnostic tools in mycobacteriology. J Microbiol Methods. 2008; 75(1):1-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2008.05.023. View

Millen S, Uys P, Hargrove J, van Helden P, Williams B . The effect of diagnostic delays on the drop-out rate and the total delay to diagnosis of tuberculosis. PLoS One. 2008; 3(4):e1933. PMC: 2276686. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001933. View

Shea Y, Davis J, Huang L, Kovacs J, Masur H, Mulindwa F . High sensitivity and specificity of acid-fast microscopy for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in an African population with a high prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus. J Clin Microbiol. 2009; 47(5):1553-5. PMC: 2681839. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00348-09. View

Moore D, Guzman J, Mikhail L . Reduction in turnaround time for laboratory diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis by routine use of a nucleic acid amplification test. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2005; 52(3):247-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2005.02.014. View

10.

Greco S, Rulli M, Girardi E, Piersimoni C, Saltini C . Diagnostic accuracy of in-house PCR for pulmonary tuberculosis in smear-positive patients: meta-analysis and metaregression. J Clin Microbiol. 2009; 47(3):569-76. PMC: 2650956. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02051-08. View

11.

Zhu R, Zhang K, Zhao M, Liu Y, Xu Y, Ju C . Use of visual loop-mediated isotheral amplification of rimM sequence for rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium bovis. J Microbiol Methods. 2009; 78(3):339-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2009.07.006. View

12.

Pai M, Minion J, Sohn H, Zwerling A, Perkins M . Novel and improved technologies for tuberculosis diagnosis: progress and challenges. Clin Chest Med. 2009; 30(4):701-16, viii. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccm.2009.08.016. View

13.

Behr M, Warren S, Salamon H, Hopewell P, Ponce De Leon A, Daley C . Transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from patients smear-negative for acid-fast bacilli. Lancet. 1999; 353(9151):444-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(98)03406-0. View

14.

. Updated guidelines for the use of nucleic acid amplification tests in the diagnosis of tuberculosis. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009; 58(1):7-10. View

15.

Pathak D, Chakravorty S, Hanif M, Sivaswami Tyagi J . Lysis of tubercle bacilli in fresh and stored sputum specimens: implications for diagnosing tuberculosis in stored and paucibacillary specimens by PCR. BMC Microbiol. 2007; 7:83. PMC: 2008200. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2180-7-83. View

16.

Pai M, Minion J, Steingart K, Ramsay A . New and improved tuberculosis diagnostics: evidence, policy, practice, and impact. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2010; 16(3):271-84. DOI: 10.1097/MCP.0b013e328338094f. View

17.

Morris K . WHO recommends against inaccurate tuberculosis tests. Lancet. 2011; 377(9760):113-4. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60005-6. View

18.

Altman D, Bland J . Diagnostic tests. 1: Sensitivity and specificity. BMJ. 1994; 308(6943):1552. PMC: 2540489. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.308.6943.1552. View

19.

Pandey B, Poudel A, Yoda T, Tamaru A, Oda N, Fukushima Y . Development of an in-house loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and evaluation in sputum samples of Nepalese patients. J Med Microbiol. 2008; 57(Pt 4):439-443. DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.47499-0. View

20.

Davies P, Pai M . The diagnosis and misdiagnosis of tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2008; 12(11):1226-34. View