» Articles » PMID: 27345957

The Lombard Effect in Male Ultrasonic Frogs: Regulating Antiphonal Signal Frequency and Amplitude in Noise

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2016 Jun 28
PMID 27345957
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Acoustic communication in noisy environments presents a significant challenge for vocal animals because noise can interfere with animal acoustic signals by decreasing signal-to-noise ratios and masking signals. Birds and mammals increase call intensity or frequency as noise levels increase, but it is unclear to what extend this behavior is shared by frogs. Concave-eared torrent frogs (Odorrana tormota) have evolved the capacity to produce various calls containing ultrasonic harmonics and to communicate beside noisy streams. However, it is largely unclear how frogs regulate vocalization in response to increasing noise levels. We exposed male frogs to various levels of noise with playback of conspecific female courtship calls and recorded antiphonal signals and spontaneous short calls. Males were capable of rapidly adjusting fundamental frequency and amplitude of antiphonal signals as noise levels increased. The increment in fundamental frequency and amplitude was approximately 0.5 kHz and 3 dB with every 10 dB increase in noise level, indicating the presence of noise-dependent signal characteristics. Males showed the noise-tolerant adaption in response to female calls in noise level from 40 to 90 dB SPL. The results suggest that the noise-dependent signal characteristics in O. tormota have evolved as a strategy to cope with varying torrent noise.

Citing Articles

Consistency in responses to conspecific advertisement calls with various signal-to-noise ratios in both sexes of the Anhui tree frog.

Wang Z, Ma H, Chen C, Sun R, Liu K, Zhang B Curr Zool. 2023; 69(6):718-726.

PMID: 37876647 PMC: 10591154. DOI: 10.1093/cz/zoac088.


A meta-analysis on the evolution of the Lombard effect reveals that amplitude adjustments are a widespread vertebrate mechanism.

Kunc H, Morrison K, Schmidt R Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022; 119(30):e2117809119.

PMID: 35858414 PMC: 9335264. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2117809119.


Constant Resting Frequency and Auditory Midbrain Neuronal Frequency Analysis of in Background White Noise.

Zhang G, Cui Z, Wu J, Jin B, Zhou D, Liu L Front Behav Neurosci. 2021; 15:657155.

PMID: 34113242 PMC: 8185161. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.657155.


A system for controlling vocal communication networks.

Rychen J, Rodrigues D, Tomka T, Ruttimann L, Yamahachi H, Hahnloser R Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):11099.

PMID: 34045536 PMC: 8160343. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-90549-0.


Males increase call frequency, not intensity, in response to noise, revealing no Lombard effect in the little torrent frog.

Zhao L, Sun X, Chen Q, Yang Y, Wang J, Ran J Ecol Evol. 2019; 8(23):11733-11741.

PMID: 30598771 PMC: 6303699. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4625.


References
1.
Shen J, Feng A, Xu Z, Yu Z, Arch V, Yu X . Ultrasonic frogs show hyperacute phonotaxis to female courtship calls. Nature. 2008; 453(7197):914-6. DOI: 10.1038/nature06719. View

2.
Liu J, Yang H, Hu G, Li S, Xu Z, Qi Z . Little effect of natural noise on high-frequency hearing in frogs, Odorrana tormota. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2015; 201(10):1029-34. DOI: 10.1007/s00359-015-1035-2. View

3.
Hage S, Jiang T, Berquist S, Feng J, Metzner W . Ambient noise induces independent shifts in call frequency and amplitude within the Lombard effect in echolocating bats. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110(10):4063-8. PMC: 3593919. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1211533110. View

4.
Sinnott J, Stebbins W, Moody D . Regulation of voice amplitude by the monkey. J Acoust Soc Am. 1975; 58(2):412-4. DOI: 10.1121/1.380685. View

5.
Tressler J, Smotherman M . Context-dependent effects of noise on echolocation pulse characteristics in free-tailed bats. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2009; 195(10):923-34. PMC: 2825556. DOI: 10.1007/s00359-009-0468-x. View