» Articles » PMID: 21632945

Multiple Routes from Occipital to Temporal Cortices During Reading

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2011 Jun 3
PMID 21632945
Citations 56
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Contemporary models of the neural system that supports reading propose that activity in a ventral occipitotemporal area (vOT) drives activity in higher-order language areas, for example, those in the posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS) and anterior superior temporal sulcus (aSTS). We used fMRI with dynamic causal modeling (DCM) to investigate evidence for other routes from visual cortex to the left temporal lobe language areas. First we identified activations in posterior inferior occipital (iO) and vOT areas that were more activated for silent reading than listening to words and sentences; and in pSTS and aSTS areas that were commonly activated for reading relative to false-fonts and listening to words relative to reversed words. Second, in three different DCM analyses, we tested whether visual processing of words modulates activity from the following: (1) iO→vOT, iO→pSTS, both, or neither; (2) vOT→pSTS, iO→pSTS, both or neither; and (3) pSTS→aSTS, vOT→aSTS, both, or neither. We found that reading words increased connectivity (1) from iO to both pSTS and vOT; (2) to pSTS from both iO and vOT; and (3) to aSTS from both vOT and pSTS. These results highlight three potential processing streams in the occipitotemporal cortex: iO→pSTS→aSTS; iO→vOT→aSTS; and iO→vOT→pSTS→aSTS. We discuss these results in terms of cognitive models of reading and propose that efficient reading relies on the integrity of all these pathways.

Citing Articles

Constraining current neuroanatomical models of reading: the view from Arabic.

L Seghier M, Boudelaa S Brain Struct Funct. 2024; 229(9):2167-2185.

PMID: 38969935 DOI: 10.1007/s00429-024-02827-y.


The Role of Occipitotemporal Network for Speed-Reading: An fMRI Study.

Sun D, Zhang Z, Oishi N, Dai Q, Thuy D, Abe N Neurosci Bull. 2024; 40(9):1261-1273.

PMID: 38937384 PMC: 11365886. DOI: 10.1007/s12264-024-01251-w.


Distinct brain morphometry patterns revealed by deep learning improve prediction of post-stroke aphasia severity.

Teghipco A, Newman-Norlund R, Fridriksson J, Rorden C, Bonilha L Commun Med (Lond). 2024; 4(1):115.

PMID: 38866977 PMC: 11169346. DOI: 10.1038/s43856-024-00541-8.


Distinct brain morphometry patterns revealed by deep learning improve prediction of aphasia severity.

Teghipco A, Newman-Norlund R, Fridriksson J, Rorden C, Bonilha L Res Sq. 2023; .

PMID: 37461696 PMC: 10350198. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3126126/v1.


Human cerebellum and corticocerebellar connections involved in emotional memory enhancement.

Fastenrath M, Spalek K, Coynel D, Loos E, Milnik A, Egli T Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022; 119(41):e2204900119.

PMID: 36191198 PMC: 9564100. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2204900119.


References
1.
L Seghier M, Zeidman P, Neufeld N, Leff A, Price C . Identifying abnormal connectivity in patients using dynamic causal modeling of FMRI responses. Front Syst Neurosci. 2010; 4. PMC: 2936900. DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2010.00142. View

2.
Mechelli A, Crinion J, Long S, Friston K, Lambon Ralph M, Patterson K . Dissociating reading processes on the basis of neuronal interactions. J Cogn Neurosci. 2005; 17(11):1753-65. DOI: 10.1162/089892905774589190. View

3.
Simons J, Koutstaal W, Prince S, Wagner A, Schacter D . Neural mechanisms of visual object priming: evidence for perceptual and semantic distinctions in fusiform cortex. Neuroimage. 2003; 19(3):613-26. DOI: 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00096-x. View

4.
Stephan K, Penny W, Moran R, den Ouden H, Daunizeau J, Friston K . Ten simple rules for dynamic causal modeling. Neuroimage. 2009; 49(4):3099-109. PMC: 2825373. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.11.015. View

5.
Nobre A, Allison T, McCarthy G . Word recognition in the human inferior temporal lobe. Nature. 1994; 372(6503):260-3. DOI: 10.1038/372260a0. View