The Evolution of Cognitive Models: From Neuropsychology to Neuroimaging and Back

Overview

Journal Cortex

Specialties Neurology
Psychology
Social Sciences

Date 2018 Jan 27

PMID 29373117

Citations 10

Authors

Cathy J Price

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

This paper provides a historical and future perspective on how neuropsychology and neuroimaging can be used to develop cognitive models of human brain functions. Section 1 focuses on the emergence of cognitive modelling from neuropsychology, why lesion location was considered to be unimportant and the challenges faced when mapping symptoms to impaired cognitive processes. Section 2 describes how established cognitive models based on behavioural data alone cannot explain the complex patterns of distributed brain activity that are observed in functional neuroimaging studies. This has led to proposals for new cognitive processes, new cognitive strategies and new functional ontologies for cognition. Section 3 considers how the integration of data from lesion, behavioural and functional neuroimaging studies of large cohorts of brain damaged patients can be used to determine whether inter-patient variability in behaviour is due to differences in the premorbid function of each brain region, lesion site or cognitive strategy. This combination of neuroimaging and neuropsychology is providing a deeper understanding of how cognitive functions can be lost and re-learnt after brain damage - an understanding that will transform our ability to generate and validate cognitive models that are both physiologically plausible and clinically useful.

Citing Articles

Comparative analysis of Voxel-based morphometry using T1 and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging to explore the relationship between brain structure and cognitive abilities.

Jalalvandi M, Batouli S Exp Brain Res. 2025; 243(2):50.

PMID: 39836225 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-025-07000-3.

Decomposing Neural Circuit Function into Information Processing Primitives.

Voges N, Lima V, Hausmann J, Brovelli A, Battaglia D J Neurosci. 2023; 44(2).

PMID: 38050070 PMC: 10866194. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0157-23.2023.

Neural network process simulations support a distributed memory system and aid design of a novel computer adaptive digital memory test for preclinical and prodromal Alzheimer's disease.

Stricker J, Corriveau-Lecavalier N, Wiepert D, Botha H, Jones D, Stricker N Neuropsychology. 2022; 37(6):698-715.

PMID: 36037486 PMC: 9971333. DOI: 10.1037/neu0000847.

Context-sensitive computational mechanistic explanation in cognitive neuroscience.

Wit M, Matheson H Front Psychol. 2022; 13:903960.

PMID: 35936251 PMC: 9355036. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.903960.

From Action to Cognition: Neural Reuse, Network Theory and the Emergence of Higher Cognitive Functions.

Ptak R, Doganci N, Bourgeois A Brain Sci. 2021; 11(12).

PMID: 34942954 PMC: 8699577. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11121652.

References

Page M . What can't functional neuroimaging tell the cognitive psychologist?. Cortex. 2006; 42(3):428-43. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70375-7. View

Price C, Moore C, Humphreys G, Frackowiak R, Friston K . The neural regions sustaining object recognition and naming. Proc Biol Sci. 1996; 263(1376):1501-7. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1996.0219. View

Humphreys G, Riddoch M . Routes to object constancy: implications from neurological impairments of object constancy. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1984; 36(3):385-415. DOI: 10.1080/14640748408402169. View

Starrfelt R, Habekost T, Leff A . Too little, too late: reduced visual span and speed characterize pure alexia. Cereb Cortex. 2009; 19(12):2880-90. PMC: 2774391. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhp059. View

Mechelli A, Crinion J, Long S, Friston K, Lambon Ralph M, Patterson K . Dissociating reading processes on the basis of neuronal interactions. J Cogn Neurosci. 2005; 17(11):1753-65. DOI: 10.1162/089892905774589190. View

Starrfelt R, Behrmann M . Number reading in pure alexia--a review. Neuropsychologia. 2011; 49(9):2283-98. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.04.028. View

Bub D, Arguin M, Lecours A . Jules Dejerine and his interpretation of pure alexia. Brain Lang. 1993; 45(4):531-59. DOI: 10.1006/brln.1993.1059. View

Plaut D, McClelland J, Seidenberg M, Patterson K . Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychol Rev. 1996; 103(1):56-115. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.103.1.56. View

Hastings J, Frishkoff G, Smith B, Jensen M, Poldrack R, Lomax J . Interdisciplinary perspectives on the development, integration, and application of cognitive ontologies. Front Neuroinform. 2014; 8:62. PMC: 4064452. DOI: 10.3389/fninf.2014.00062. View

10.

Richardson F, Thomas M, Filippi R, Harth H, Price C . Contrasting effects of vocabulary knowledge on temporal and parietal brain structure across lifespan. J Cogn Neurosci. 2009; 22(5):943-54. PMC: 2860571. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21238. View

11.

Price C, Moore C, Friston K . Subtractions, conjunctions, and interactions in experimental design of activation studies. Hum Brain Mapp. 2010; 5(4):264-72. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1997)5:4<264::AID-HBM11>3.0.CO;2-E. View

12.

Coltheart M . What has functional neuroimaging told us about the mind (so far)?. Cortex. 2006; 42(3):323-31. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70358-7. View

13.

Cohen L, Martinaud O, Lemer C, Lehericy S, Samson Y, Obadia M . Visual word recognition in the left and right hemispheres: anatomical and functional correlates of peripheral alexias. Cereb Cortex. 2003; 13(12):1313-33. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhg079. View

14.

Richardson F, L Seghier M, Leff A, Thomas M, Price C . Multiple routes from occipital to temporal cortices during reading. J Neurosci. 2011; 31(22):8239-47. PMC: 3785141. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6519-10.2011. View

15.

Mather M, Cacioppo J, Kanwisher N . Introduction to the Special Section: 20 Years of fMRI-What Has It Done for Understanding Cognition?. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015; 8(1):41-3. DOI: 10.1177/1745691612469036. View

16.

Coltheart M, Rastle K, Perry C, Langdon R, Ziegler J . DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychol Rev. 2001; 108(1):204-56. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.108.1.204. View

17.

Price C, Friston K . Functional ontologies for cognition: The systematic definition of structure and function. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2010; 22(3):262-75. DOI: 10.1080/02643290442000095. View

18.

Humphreys G, Price C, Riddoch M . From objects to names: a cognitive neuroscience approach. Psychol Res. 1999; 62(2-3):118-30. DOI: 10.1007/s004260050046. View

19.

Woollams A, Lambon Ralph M, Plaut D, Patterson K . SD-squared revisited: reply to Coltheart, Tree, and Saunders (2010). Psychol Rev. 2010; 117(1):273-81. DOI: 10.1037/a0017641. View

20.

Schutter D, de Haan E, van Honk J . Scaling problems in the brain-mind conundrum. Cortex. 2006; 42(3):411-3. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70371-x. View