» Articles » PMID: 21542028

Can Carcinogenic Potency Be Predicted from in Vivo Genotoxicity Data?: a Meta-analysis of Historical Data

Overview
Date 2011 May 5
PMID 21542028
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Genotoxicity is generally a parameter used for hazard identification, however, the applicability of using in vivo genotoxicity tests for hazard characterization has never been thoroughly investigated in a quantitative manner. Genotoxicity assays could be useful for the determination of cancer potency parameters given that genotoxicty tests measure mutations and/or chromosomal aberrations which are strongly associated with carcinogenesis. A detailed literature survey was performed in search for dose-response data in various in vivo genotoxicity and carcinogenicity studies. The benchmark dose (BMD) approach was applied using the dose-response modeling program PROAST. Dose-response data were available from 18 compounds in the micronucleus assay (MN), the in vivo transgenic rodent mutation assay (TG) and the comet assay, and their BMD(10) values were compared to the BMD(10) from carcinogenicity studies in mice. Of the 18 compounds, 15 had acceptable dose-response data from the MN and the TG, but only 4 from the comet assay. A major limitation in our analysis was the lack of proper dose-response studies using the recommended protocols. Nevertheless, our findings are promising because even with these suboptimal studies, a positive correlation was observed when the lowest BMD(10) from the genotoxicity tests (MN and TG) was compared to the tissue-matched carcinogenicity BMD(10) . It is evident that more compounds need to be analyzed with proper dose-response schemes to further validate our initial findings. Experimental designs of genotoxicity assays need to shift from focusing only on hazard identification where positive and negative results are reported, to a more quantitative, dose-response assessment.

Citing Articles

Genotoxicity assessment: opportunities, challenges and perspectives for quantitative evaluations of dose-response data.

Menz J, Gotz M, Gundel U, Gurtler R, Herrmann K, Hessel-Pras S Arch Toxicol. 2023; 97(9):2303-2328.

PMID: 37402810 PMC: 10404208. DOI: 10.1007/s00204-023-03553-w.


Establishing a quantitative framework for regulatory interpretation of genetic toxicity dose-response data: Margin of exposure case study of 48 compounds with both in vivo mutagenicity and carcinogenicity dose-response data.

Chepelev N, Long A, Beal M, Barton-Maclaren T, Johnson G, Dearfield K Environ Mol Mutagen. 2022; 64(1):4-15.

PMID: 36345771 PMC: 10107494. DOI: 10.1002/em.22517.


Mode of action-based risk assessment of genotoxic carcinogens.

Hartwig A, Arand M, Epe B, Guth S, Jahnke G, Lampen A Arch Toxicol. 2020; 94(6):1787-1877.

PMID: 32542409 PMC: 7303094. DOI: 10.1007/s00204-020-02733-2.


Benchmark Dose Modeling of Genotoxicity Data: a Reanalysis.

Guo X, Mei N Toxicol Res. 2018; 34(4):303-310.

PMID: 30370005 PMC: 6195882. DOI: 10.5487/TR.2018.34.4.303.


Benchmark dose analyses of multiple genetic toxicity endpoints permit robust, cross-tissue comparisons of MutaMouse responses to orally delivered benzo[a]pyrene.

Long A, Wills J, Krolak D, Guo M, Dertinger S, Arlt V Arch Toxicol. 2017; 92(2):967-982.

PMID: 29177888 PMC: 5818629. DOI: 10.1007/s00204-017-2099-2.