» Articles » PMID: 24801602

Derivation of Point of Departure (PoD) Estimates in Genetic Toxicology Studies and Their Potential Applications in Risk Assessment

Abstract

Genetic toxicology data have traditionally been employed for qualitative, rather than quantitative evaluations of hazard. As a continuation of our earlier report that analyzed ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) and methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) dose-response data (Gollapudi et al., 2013), here we present analyses of 1-ethyl-1-nitrosourea (ENU) and 1-methyl-1-nitrosourea (MNU) dose-response data and additional approaches for the determination of genetic toxicity point-of-departure (PoD) metrics. We previously described methods to determine the no-observed-genotoxic-effect-level (NOGEL), the breakpoint-dose (BPD; previously named Td), and the benchmark dose (BMD10 ) for genetic toxicity endpoints. In this study we employed those methods, along with a new approach, to determine the non-linear slope-transition-dose (STD), and alternative methods to determine the BPD and BMD, for the analyses of nine ENU and 22 MNU datasets across a range of in vitro and in vivo endpoints. The NOGEL, BMDL10 and BMDL1SD PoD metrics could be readily calculated for most gene mutation and chromosomal damage studies; however, BPDs and STDs could not always be derived due to data limitations and constraints of the underlying statistical methods. The BMDL10 values were often lower than the other PoDs, and the distribution of BMDL10 values produced the lowest median PoD. Our observations indicate that, among the methods investigated in this study, the BMD approach is the preferred PoD for quantitatively describing genetic toxicology data. Once genetic toxicology PoDs are calculated via this approach, they can be used to derive reference doses and margin of exposure values that may be useful for evaluating human risk and regulatory decision making.

Citing Articles

A multi-biomarker micronucleus assay using imaging flow cytometry.

Harte D, Lynch A, Verma J, Rees P, Filby A, Wills J Arch Toxicol. 2024; 98(9):3137-3153.

PMID: 38995349 PMC: 11324684. DOI: 10.1007/s00204-024-03801-7.


N-Nitrosodimethylamine investigations in Muta™Mouse define point-of-departure values and demonstrate less-than-additive somatic mutant frequency accumulations.

Lynch A, Howe J, Hildebrand D, Harvey J, Burman M, Harte D Mutagenesis. 2024; 39(2):96-118.

PMID: 38183622 PMC: 10928842. DOI: 10.1093/mutage/geae001.


Investigating the dependency of in vitro benchmark concentrations on exposure time in transcriptomics experiments.

Carpi D, Liska R, Malinowska J, Palosaari T, Bouhifd M, Whelan M Toxicol In Vitro. 2023; 95:105761.

PMID: 38081393 PMC: 10879918. DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2023.105761.


Scientific opinion on the renewal of the authorisation of SmokEz Enviro-23 (SF-006) as a smoke flavouring Primary Product.

Younes M, Aquilina G, Castle L, Degen G, Engel K, Fowler P EFSA J. 2023; 21(11):e08368.

PMID: 38027452 PMC: 10652696. DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8368.


Scientific opinion on the renewal of the authorisation of SmokEz C-10 (SF-005) as a smoke flavouring Primary Product.

Younes M, Aquilina G, Castle L, Engel K, Fowler P, Frutos Fernandez M EFSA J. 2023; 21(11):e08367.

PMID: 38027441 PMC: 10652705. DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8367.


References
1.
Jenkins G, Doak S, Johnson G, Quick E, Waters E, Parry J . Do dose response thresholds exist for genotoxic alkylating agents?. Mutagenesis. 2005; 20(6):389-98. DOI: 10.1093/mutage/gei054. View

2.
Bryce S, Avlasevich S, Bemis J, Phonethepswath S, Dertinger S . Miniaturized flow cytometric in vitro micronucleus assay represents an efficient tool for comprehensively characterizing genotoxicity dose-response relationships. Mutat Res. 2010; 703(2):191-9. PMC: 2991389. DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2010.08.020. View

3.
Johnson G, Doak S, Griffiths S, Quick E, Skibinski D, Zair Z . Non-linear dose-response of DNA-reactive genotoxins: recommendations for data analysis. Mutat Res. 2009; 678(2):95-100. DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2009.05.009. View

4.
Elhajouji A, Lukamowicz M, Cammerer Z, Kirsch-Volders M . Potential thresholds for genotoxic effects by micronucleus scoring. Mutagenesis. 2010; 26(1):199-204. DOI: 10.1093/mutage/geq089. View

5.
Gollapudi B, Thybaud V, Kim J, Holsapple M . Strategies for the follow-up of positive results in the in vitro genotoxicity assays--an international collaborative initiative. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2010; 52(3):174-6. DOI: 10.1002/em.20611. View