» Articles » PMID: 36926648

The Family of Single-Case Experimental Designs

Overview
Publisher MIT Press
Date 2023 Mar 17
PMID 36926648
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Single-case experimental designs (SCEDs) represent a family of research designs that use experimental methods to study the effects of treatments on outcomes. The fundamental unit of analysis is the single case-which can be an individual, clinic, or community-ideally with replications of effects within and/or between cases. These designs are flexible and cost-effective and can be used for treatment development, translational research, personalized interventions, and the study of rare diseases and disorders. This article provides a broad overview of the family of single-case experimental designs with corresponding examples, including reversal designs, multiple baseline designs, combined multiple baseline/reversal designs, and integration of single-case designs to identify optimal treatments for individuals into larger randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Personalized N-of-1 trials can be considered a subcategory of SCEDs that overlaps with reversal designs. Relevant issues for each type of design-including comparisons of treatments, design issues such as randomization and blinding, standards for designs, and statistical approaches to complement visual inspection of single-case experimental designs-are also discussed.

Citing Articles

Revisiting ecological fallacy: are single-case experimental study designs even more relevant in the era of precision medicine?.

Christophides T, Karekla M Precis Clin Med. 2024; 7(4):pbae025.

PMID: 39507291 PMC: 11540157. DOI: 10.1093/pcmedi/pbae025.


The effect of the stress autism mate app on perceived stress, coping, and resilience in adults with autism: a single-case experimental design.

Hoeberichts K, Roke Y, Niks I, van Harten P Front Psychiatry. 2024; 15:1347947.

PMID: 38938455 PMC: 11210387. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1347947.


Planning Individual and Population-Based Interventions in Global Health: Applying the DEA-A Framework to Promote Behavioral, Emotional, and/or Cognitive Change among Stakeholders.

Broc G, Fassier J, Raffard S, Lareyre O Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024; 21(3).

PMID: 38541376 PMC: 10970467. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21030378.


Assessing the Effectiveness of STAPP@Work, a Self-Management Mobile App, in Reducing Work Stress and Preventing Burnout: Single-Case Experimental Design Study.

Demirel S, Roke Y, Hoogendoorn A, Hoefakker J, Hoeberichts K, van Harten P J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e48883.

PMID: 38275128 PMC: 10940977. DOI: 10.2196/48883.


N-of-1 Trials, Their Reporting Guidelines, and the Advancement of Open Science Principles.

Porcino A, Vohra S Harv Data Sci Rev. 2023; 4(SI3).

PMID: 38031562 PMC: 10686313. DOI: 10.1162/99608f92.a65a257a.


References
1.
Boles R, Roberts M, Vernberg E . Treating non-retentive encopresis with rewarded scheduled toilet visits. Behav Anal Pract. 2012; 1(2):68-72. PMC: 2846588. DOI: 10.1007/BF03391730. View

2.
Hekler E, Tiro J, Hunter C, Nebeker C . Precision Health: The Role of the Social and Behavioral Sciences in Advancing the Vision. Ann Behav Med. 2020; 54(11):805-826. PMC: 7646154. DOI: 10.1093/abm/kaaa018. View

3.
Pustejovsky J . Procedural sensitivities of effect sizes for single-case designs with directly observed behavioral outcome measures. Psychol Methods. 2018; 24(2):217-235. DOI: 10.1037/met0000179. View

4.
Butler D . Translational research: crossing the valley of death. Nature. 2008; 453(7197):840-2. DOI: 10.1038/453840a. View

5.
Hartmann D, Hall R . The changing criterion design. J Appl Behav Anal. 1976; 9(4):527-32. PMC: 1312042. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1976.9-527. View