» Articles » PMID: 21497083

Topological Constraints: Using RNA Secondary Structure to Model 3D Conformation, Folding Pathways, and Dynamic Adaptation

Overview
Date 2011 Apr 19
PMID 21497083
Citations 39
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Accompanying recent advances in determining RNA secondary structure is the growing appreciation for the importance of relatively simple topological constraints, encoded at the secondary structure level, in defining the overall architecture, folding pathways, and dynamic adaptability of RNA. A new view is emerging in which tertiary interactions do not define RNA 3D structure, but rather, help select specific conformers from an already narrow, topologically pre-defined conformational distribution. Studies are providing fundamental insights into the nature of these topological constraints, how they are encoded by the RNA secondary structure, and how they interplay with other interactions, breathing new meaning to RNA secondary structure. New approaches have been developed that take advantage of topological constraints in determining RNA backbone conformation based on secondary structure, and a limited set of other, easily accessible constraints. Topological constraints are also providing a much-needed framework for rationalizing and describing RNA dynamics and structural adaptation. Finally, studies suggest that topological constraints may play important roles in steering RNA folding pathways. Here, we review recent advances in our understanding of topological constraints encoded by the RNA secondary structure.

Citing Articles

The DEAD-box ATPase Dbp10/DDX54 initiates peptidyl transferase center formation during 60S ribosome biogenesis.

Cruz V, Weirich C, Peddada N, Erzberger J Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):3296.

PMID: 38632236 PMC: 11024185. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-47616-7.


Small molecule approaches to targeting RNA.

Kovachka S, Panosetti M, Grimaldi B, Azoulay S, Di Giorgio A, Duca M Nat Rev Chem. 2024; 8(2):120-135.

PMID: 38278932 DOI: 10.1038/s41570-023-00569-9.


Vfold2D-MC: A Physics-Based Hybrid Model for Predicting RNA Secondary Structure Folding.

Cheng Y, Zhang S, Xu X, Chen S J Phys Chem B. 2021; 125(36):10108-10118.

PMID: 34473508 PMC: 8903033. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.1c04731.


The mechanism driving a solid-solid phase transition in a biomacromolecular crystal.

Ramakrishnan S, Stagno J, Heinz W, Zuo X, Yu P, Wang Y IUCrJ. 2021; 8(Pt 4):655-664.

PMID: 34258013 PMC: 8256710. DOI: 10.1107/S2052252521004826.


Predicting RNA Scaffolds with a Hybrid Method of Vfold3D and VfoldLA.

Xu X, Chen S Methods Mol Biol. 2021; 2323:1-11.

PMID: 34086269 PMC: 9728534. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1499-0_1.


References
1.
Lavender C, Ding F, Dokholyan N, Weeks K . Robust and generic RNA modeling using inferred constraints: a structure for the hepatitis C virus IRES pseudoknot domain. Biochemistry. 2010; 49(24):4931-3. PMC: 2889920. DOI: 10.1021/bi100142y. View

2.
Jonikas M, Radmer R, Laederach A, Das R, Pearlman S, Herschlag D . Coarse-grained modeling of large RNA molecules with knowledge-based potentials and structural filters. RNA. 2009; 15(2):189-99. PMC: 2648710. DOI: 10.1261/rna.1270809. View

3.
Laing C, Jung S, Iqbal A, Schlick T . Tertiary motifs revealed in analyses of higher-order RNA junctions. J Mol Biol. 2009; 393(1):67-82. PMC: 3174529. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.07.089. View

4.
Lilley D, Clegg R, Diekmann S, Seeman N, Von Kitzing E, Hagerman P . A nomenclature of junctions and branchpoints in nucleic acids. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995; 23(17):3363-4. PMC: 307211. DOI: 10.1093/nar/23.17.3363. View

5.
Bailor M, Sun X, Al-Hashimi H . Topology links RNA secondary structure with global conformation, dynamics, and adaptation. Science. 2010; 327(5962):202-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.1181085. View