» Articles » PMID: 32979637

Improved Biofilm Removal Using Cavitation from a Dental Ultrasonic Scaler Vibrating in Carbonated Water

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2020 Sep 26
PMID 32979637
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The use of cavitation for improving biofilm cleaning is of great interest. There is no system at present that removes the biofilm from medical implants effectively and specifically from dental implants. Cavitation generated by a vibrating dental ultrasonic scaler tip can clean biomaterials such as dental implants. However, the cleaning process must be significantly accelerated for clinical applications. In this study we investigated whether the cavitation could be increased, by operating the scaler in carbonated water with different CO concentrations. The cavitation around an ultrasonic scaler tip was recorded with high speed imaging. Image analysis was used to calculate the area of cavitation. Bacterial biofilm was grown on surfaces and its removal was imaged with a high speed camera using the ultrasonic scaler in still and carbonated water. Cavitation increases significantly with increasing carbonation. Cavitation also started earlier around the tips when they were in carbonated water compared to non-carbonated water. Significantly more biofilm was removed when the scaler was operated in carbonated water. Our results suggest that using carbonated water could significantly increase and accelerate cavitation around ultrasonic scalers in a clinical situation and thus improve biofilm removal from dental implants and other biomaterials.

Citing Articles

Revolutionizing oral care: Reactive oxygen species (ROS)-Regulating biomaterials for combating infection and inflammation.

Zhao W, Zhang Y, Chen J, Hu D Redox Biol. 2024; 79():103451.

PMID: 39631247 PMC: 11664010. DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2024.103451.


Biofilm removal from Difficult-to-Reach places via secondary cavitation within a constrained geometry mimicking a Periodontal/Peri-Implant pocket.

Volk M, Molan K, Savli D, Terlep S, Levicnik-Hofferle S, Gaspirc B Ultrason Sonochem. 2024; 104:106832.

PMID: 38429168 PMC: 10985801. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2024.106832.


Antibiofilm Effect of Cinnamaldehyde-Chitosan Nanoparticles against the Biofilm of .

Xu J, Lin Q, Sheng M, Ding T, Li B, Gao Y Antibiotics (Basel). 2022; 11(10).

PMID: 36290061 PMC: 9598764. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11101403.


Influence of Surface Tension on Dynamic Characteristics of Single Bubble in Free-Field Exposed to Ultrasound.

Wu H, Zhang T, Lai X, Yu H, Li D, Zheng H Micromachines (Basel). 2022; 13(5).

PMID: 35630249 PMC: 9147617. DOI: 10.3390/mi13050782.

References
1.
Le Guehennec L, Soueidan A, Layrolle P, Amouriq Y . Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. Dent Mater. 2006; 23(7):844-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.025. View

2.
Carmen J, Roeder B, Nelson J, Ogilvie R, Robison R, Schaalje G . Treatment of biofilm infections on implants with low-frequency ultrasound and antibiotics. Am J Infect Control. 2005; 33(2):78-82. PMC: 1361257. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2004.08.002. View

3.
Augthun M, Tinschert J, Huber A . In vitro studies on the effect of cleaning methods on different implant surfaces. J Periodontol. 1998; 69(8):857-64. DOI: 10.1902/jop.1998.69.8.857. View

4.
Rooze J, Rebrov E, Schouten J, Keurentjes J . Dissolved gas and ultrasonic cavitation--a review. Ultrason Sonochem. 2012; 20(1):1-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2012.04.013. View

5.
Alcoforado G, Rams T, Feik D, Slots J . Microbial aspects of failing osseointegrated dental implants in humans. J Parodontol. 1991; 10(1):11-8. View