» Articles » PMID: 21455806

Predictors of Complications After Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: a Prognostic Model for Early Discharge

Overview
Journal Surg Endosc
Publisher Springer
Date 2011 Apr 2
PMID 21455806
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Several studies have evaluated predictors for complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), but their relative importance is unknown. In addition, currently used blood tests to detect post-ERCP pancreatitis are inconsistent. The aim of this study was to determine predictors of post-ERCP complications that could discriminate between patients at highest and lowest risk of post-ERCP complications and to develop a model that is able to identify patients that can safely be discharged shortly after ERCP.

Methods: In a single-center, retrospective analysis over the period 2002-2007, predictors of post-ERCP complications were evaluated in a multivariable analysis and compared with those identified from a literature review. A prognostic model was developed based on these risk factors, which was further evaluated in a prospective patient population.

Results: From our retrospective analysis and literature review, we selected the eight most important risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis and cholangitis. In the prognostic model, the risk factors (precut) sphincterotomy, sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, younger age, female gender, history of pancreatitis, pancreas divisum, and difficult cannulation accounted for a score of 1 each, whereas primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) accounted for a score of 2. A sum score of 4 or more in the prognostic model was associated with a high risk of developing pancreatitis and cholangitis (27%; 6/22) in the prospective patient population, whereas a sum score of 3 or less was associated with a low to intermediate risk (8%; 20/252).

Conclusions: We identified specific patient- and procedure-related factors that are associated with post-ERCP complications. The prognostic model based on these factors is able to identify patients who can be safely discharged the same day after ERCP.

Citing Articles

Acute pancreatitis and biliary obstruction from metastatic lymph node compression during [Lu] Lu-PSMA-617 therapy: a case report.

Bilgin G, Navin P, Johnson D, Sartor O, Kendi A Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1442293.

PMID: 39435291 PMC: 11491289. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1442293.


Synergistic effect of independent risk factors for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: a multicenter retrospective study in Japan.

Saito H, Kadono Y, Shono T, Kamikawa K, Urata A, Nasu J Clin Endosc. 2024; 57(4):508-514.

PMID: 38632965 PMC: 11294859. DOI: 10.5946/ce.2023.203.


Determining the Risk Factors of Complications Due to Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography.

Ozcan O, Arikan S Cureus. 2024; 16(1):e51666.

PMID: 38313949 PMC: 10838154. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.51666.


Risk factors for ERCP-related complications and what is the specific role of ASGE grading system.

Shavakhi A, Zobeiri M, Khodadoostan M, Zobeiri M, Shavakhi A J Res Med Sci. 2023; 28:7.

PMID: 36974109 PMC: 10039106. DOI: 10.4103/jrms.jrms_150_22.


Comparison of one-stage treatment versus two-stage treatment for the management of patients with common bile duct stones: A meta-analysis.

Nie S, Fu S, Fang K Front Surg. 2023; 10:1124955.

PMID: 36816010 PMC: 9935819. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1124955.


References
1.
Wang P, Li Z, Liu F, Ren X, Lu N, Fan Z . Risk factors for ERCP-related complications: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008; 104(1):31-40. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2008.5. View

2.
Mehta S, Pavone E, Barkun J, Bouchard S, Barkun A . Predictors of post-ERCP complications in patients with suspected choledocholithiasis. Endoscopy. 1998; 30(5):457-63. DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1001308. View

3.
Masci E, Toti G, Mariani A, Curioni S, Lomazzi A, Dinelli M . Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001; 96(2):417-23. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03594.x. View

4.
Boender J, Nix G, de Ridder M, van Blankenstein M, SCHUTTE H, Dees J . Endoscopic papillotomy for common bile duct stones: factors influencing the complication rate. Endoscopy. 1994; 26(2):209-16. DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1008945. View

5.
Cotton P, Garrow D, Gallagher J, Romagnuolo J . Risk factors for complications after ERCP: a multivariate analysis of 11,497 procedures over 12 years. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 70(1):80-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.10.039. View