Risk Factors for ERCP-related Complications and What is the Specific Role of ASGE Grading System

Overview

Journal J Res Med Sci

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2023 Mar 28

PMID 36974109

Authors

Ahmad Shavakhi

Mehdi Zobeiri

Mahsa Khodadoostan

Mohammad Javad Zobeiri

Alireza Shavakhi

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is one of the main therapeutic and sometimes diagnostic methods in biliary and pancreatic diseases. A grading system for the difficulty of ERCP (grade one to four, the higher grade represents the more complexity of the procedure) has been developed by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE). This study aimed to assess the prevalence of ERCP-related complications, their common risk factors, and specifically the role of difficulty of the procedure based on ASGE grading.

Material And Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed on 620 ERCP-operated patients over 4 years in two tertiary referral centers affiliated with Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Data about the difficulty of procedures based on the ASGE grading scale, complications including pancreatitis, bleeding, infection, perforation, arrhythmia, respiratory suppression, aspiration, and major common risk factors were collected.

Results: The overall prevalence of complications was 11.6% including pancreatitis 8.2%, perforation 0.8%, gastrointestinal bleeding 1.3%, cholangitis 2.4%, and cardiopulmonary problems 0.5% (arrhythmia 0.3% and respiratory depression 0.2%). Patients with pancreatic contrast injection (66.7% vs. 11.3% = 0.04) and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) (44.4% vs. 11.1%; = 0.01) showed a statistically significant higher overall complication rate. The association of these risk factors remained significant in multivariable logistic regression analysis. Patients with pancreatic contrast injection also showed a statistically significant higher prevalence of post-ERCP pancreatitis (66.7% vs. 11.3% = 0.04). Furthermore, a significantly higher prevalence of arrhythmia (3.6% vs. 0; = 0.008) was observed among patients with difficult cannulation. Based on the ASGE difficulty grading score, most of the patients were classified as grade 2 (74.2%) and 3 and 4 (23.4%). No statistically significant difference was noted between the difficulty-based groups in terms of complications.

Conclusion: The current study showed that the most critical risk factors of ERCP-induced complications were pancreatic contrast injection and SOD. ASGE grading scale for ERCP complexity did not predict the occurrence of complications in our study population.

Citing Articles

Sarcopenia as a Predictor of Mortality in a Cohort of Elderly Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography.

Mulinacci G, Conti C, Savino A, Gandola D, Ippolito D, Frego R Life (Basel). 2025; 15(1).

PMID: 39859962 PMC: 11767023. DOI: 10.3390/life15010021.

Adverse Events in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreticography for Choledocholithiasis: A Holistic Perspective.

Cankurtaran R, Ersoy O Cureus. 2024; 16(2):e53375.

PMID: 38435169 PMC: 10908872. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.53375.

References

Wang P, Li Z, Liu F, Ren X, Lu N, Fan Z . Risk factors for ERCP-related complications: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008; 104(1):31-40. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2008.5. View

Andriulli A, Caruso N, Quitadamo M, Forlano R, Leandro G, Spirito F . Antisecretory vs. antiproteasic drugs in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: the evidence-based medicine derived from a meta-analysis study. JOP. 2003; 4(1):41-8. View

Racz I, Rejchrt S, Hassan M . Complications of ERCP: ethical obligations and legal consequences. Dig Dis. 2008; 26(1):49-55. DOI: 10.1159/000109387. View

Jeurnink S, Siersema P, Steyerberg E, Dees J, Poley J, Haringsma J . Predictors of complications after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a prognostic model for early discharge. Surg Endosc. 2011; 25(9):2892-900. PMC: 3160559. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1638-9. View

Andriulli A, Loperfido S, Napolitano G, Niro G, Valvano M, Spirito F . Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007; 102(8):1781-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01279.x. View

Cotton P, Lehman G, Vennes J, GEENEN J, Russell R, Meyers W . Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991; 37(3):383-93. DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(91)70740-2. View

Freeman M . Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: avoidance and management. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2012; 22(3):567-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2012.05.001. View

Aronson N, Flamm C, Bohn R, Mark D, Speroff T . Evidence-based assessment: patient, procedure, or operator factors associated with ERCP complications. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002; 56(6 Suppl):S294-302. DOI: 10.1067/mge.2002.129021. View

Szary N, Al-Kawas F . Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: how to avoid and manage them. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2014; 9(8):496-504. PMC: 3980992. View

10.

Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G, Chilovi F, Costan F, De Berardinis F . Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998; 48(1):1-10. DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(98)70121-x. View

11.

Freeman M, DiSario J, Nelson D, Fennerty M, Lee J, Bjorkman D . Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001; 54(4):425-34. DOI: 10.1067/mge.2001.117550. View

12.

Sieg A, Eisenbach T . Prospective evaluation of complications in outpatient GI endoscopy: a survey among German gastroenterologists. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001; 53(6):620-7. DOI: 10.1067/mge.2001.114422. View

13.

Badalov N, Tenner S, Baillie J . The Prevention, recognition and treatment of post-ERCP pancreatitis. JOP. 2009; 10(2):88-97. View

14.

Giefer M, Kozarek R . Technical outcomes and complications of pediatric ERCP. Surg Endosc. 2015; 29(12):3543-50. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4105-1. View

15.

Sahar N, La Selva D, Gluck M, Gan S, Irani S, Larsen M . The ASGE grading system for ERCP can predict success and complication rates in a tertiary referral hospital. Surg Endosc. 2018; 33(2):448-453. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6317-7. View

16.

Katsinelos P, Lazaraki G, Chatzimavroudis G, Gkagkalis S, Vasiliadis I, Papaeuthimiou A . Risk factors for therapeutic ERCP-related complications: an analysis of 2,715 cases performed by a single endoscopist. Ann Gastroenterol. 2014; 27(1):65-72. PMC: 3959534. View

17.

Bassan M, Holt B, Mahady S, Bourke M . Guidewire biliary cannulation does not reduce post-ERCP pancreatitis compared with the contrast injection technique in low-risk and high-risk patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 76(1):229-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.02.006. View

18.

Cotton P, Eisen G, Romagnuolo J, Vargo J, Baron T, Tarnasky P . Grading the complexity of endoscopic procedures: results of an ASGE working party. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 73(5):868-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.12.036. View

19.

Schutz S, Abbott R . Grading ERCPs by degree of difficulty: a new concept to produce more meaningful outcome data. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000; 51(5):535-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(00)70285-9. View

20.

Fujisawa T, Kagawa K, Hisatomi K, Kubota K, Nakajima A, Matsuhashi N . Is endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation really a risk factor for post-ERCP pancreatitis?. World J Gastroenterol. 2016; 22(26):5909-16. PMC: 4948272. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i26.5909. View