Predictors of Post-ERCP Complications in Patients with Suspected Choledocholithiasis
Overview
Pharmacology
Radiology
Authors
Affiliations
Background And Study Aims: Determinants of complications after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) have not yet been completely characterized.
Patients And Methods: Data were collected from an endoscopic database. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to generate the best model of independent predictors of post-ERCP pancreatitis.
Results: The database included 1239 ERCP examinations carried out to investigate suspected choledocholithiasis over a five-year period. From these, 45 patients who developed post-ERCP complications were compared to a random sample of 486 patients who had undergone an uncomplicated ERCP for suspected choledocholithiasis. Univariate analysis demonstrated significant differences between the two patient groups for the following factors: age, using a cut-off point of 59 years (27% vs. 51%, P = 0.002), pancreatic channel opacification (73% vs. 58%, P = 0.05), and absence of common bile duct stones (41% vs. 24%, P = 0.03). Using multivariate logistic regression, the best model for predicting post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients undergoing sphincterotomy included age under 59 years (P = 0.04), and absence of a common bile duct stone (P = 0.004). The model yielded probabilities of developing post-sphincterotomy pancreatitis that ranged from 2.8% if no predictor was present, to 27% when both predictors were present. Among patients in whom a sphincterotomy was not performed, the only significant independent predictor found was pancreatic channel opacification (P = 0.05).
Conclusion: Age under 59 years, pancreatic channel opacification, and an absence of common bile duct stones at ERCP are all independent predictors of post-ERCP pancreatitis.
Goubert K, Degroote H, De Vos M, Khalenkow M, Hindryckx P J Clin Med. 2024; 13(23).
PMID: 39685938 PMC: 11642193. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13237481.
Zheng R, Chen M, Wang X, Li B, He T, Wang L Ann Transl Med. 2020; 8(20):1299.
PMID: 33209879 PMC: 7661903. DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-5769.
Johnson K, Perisetti A, Tharian B, Thandassery R, Jamidar P, Goyal H Dig Dis Sci. 2019; 65(2):361-375.
PMID: 31792671 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-019-05970-3.
Kato K, Sugimori S, Kakiya Y, Maruyama H, Fukunaga S, Nagami Y United European Gastroenterol J. 2017; 5(7):1015-1023.
PMID: 29163968 PMC: 5676547. DOI: 10.1177/2050640617694279.
Is ESR Important for Predicting Post-ERCP Pancreatitis?.
Mohammad Alizadeh A, Afzali E, Behzad C, Mousavi M, Mirsattari D, Doagoo S Clin Med Insights Gastroenterol. 2015; 8:23-7.
PMID: 26005364 PMC: 4426942. DOI: 10.4137/CGast.S18938.