» Articles » PMID: 21437554

What is Associated with Nutrition Risk in Very Old Age?

Overview
Date 2011 Mar 26
PMID 21437554
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To identify factors associated with nutrition risk among a purposive sample of those in advanced aged.

Design: A cross sectional feasibility study.

Setting: Three North Island locations in New Zealand.

Participants: One hundred and eight community-living residents aged 75- 85 years.

Measurements: Nutrition risk was assessed using a validated questionnaire, Seniors in the Community: Risk Evaluation for Eating and Nutrition, Version II (SCREEN II). A Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) was used to determine level of physical activity. Markers of body composition, grip strength and fasting blood samples were collected.

Results: Fifty-two percent of participants were at high nutrition risk (SCREEN II score < 50; range 29-58; out of maximum score 64). The mean score for SCREEN II was higher for older people who lived with others (50.3 ± 5.1) compared to those who lived alone (46.4 ± 5.8) p=0.001. The SCREEN II score was positively correlated with the total PASE score r= 0.20 (p=0.042), grip strength r=0.20 (p=0.041), and muscle mass percentage r=0.31 (p=0.004). Lower levels of haemoglobin, serum zinc and physical activity were associated with higher nutrition risk.

Conclusion: Half the participants were at high nutrition risk. They tended to be widowed or live alone and had lower levels of haemoglobin and serum zinc. Those at lower nutrition risk had greater muscle mass and strength, lower body fat, consumed alcohol more frequently and engaged in more physical activity. Strategies which encourage older people to eat meals and be physically active with others may assist to improve their health.

Citing Articles

Differentiation of the Nutritional Risk of Polish Elderly People According to Selected Demographic Characteristics and Declared Socioeconomic Status.

Gajda R, Raczkowska E, Wyka J, Suliga E, Sobas K Nutrients. 2022; 14(8).

PMID: 35458144 PMC: 9027789. DOI: 10.3390/nu14081582.


Differentiation of Nutritional Risk among Polish Seniors Based on Selected Lifestyle Characteristics.

Gajda R, Raczkowska E, Mazurkiewicz D, Suliga E Nutrients. 2022; 14(3).

PMID: 35276966 PMC: 8839248. DOI: 10.3390/nu14030607.


Identifying and Managing Malnutrition, Frailty and Sarcopenia in the Community: A Narrative Review.

Roberts S, Collins P, Rattray M Nutrients. 2021; 13(7).

PMID: 34371823 PMC: 8308465. DOI: 10.3390/nu13072316.


Exploring the Experience and Determinants of the Food Choices and Eating Practices of Elderly Thai People: A Qualitative Study.

Chalermsri C, Herzig van Wees S, Ziaei S, Ekstrom E, Muangpaisan W, Rahman S Nutrients. 2020; 12(11).

PMID: 33203013 PMC: 7696600. DOI: 10.3390/nu12113497.


Cross-Country Differences and Similarities in Undernutrition Prevalence and Risk as Measured by SCREEN II in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.

Borkent J, Keller H, Wham C, Wijers F, de van der Schueren M Healthcare (Basel). 2020; 8(2).

PMID: 32498433 PMC: 7349548. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare8020151.


References
1.
Wilkinson T, Sainsbury R . The association between mortality, morbidity and age in New Zealand's oldest old. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1998; 46(4):333-43. DOI: 10.2190/9TE4-JCB5-4C8T-PFK9. View

2.
Keller H, McKenzie J . Nutritional risk in vulnerable community-living seniors. Can J Diet Pract Res. 2003; 64(4):195-201. DOI: 10.3148/64.4.2003.195. View

3.
Lang I, Wallace R, Huppert F, Melzer D . Moderate alcohol consumption in older adults is associated with better cognition and well-being than abstinence. Age Ageing. 2007; 36(3):256-61. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afm001. View

4.
Washburn R, McAuley E, Katula J, Mihalko S, Boileau R . The physical activity scale for the elderly (PASE): evidence for validity. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999; 52(7):643-51. DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00049-9. View

5.
Keller H, Haresign H, Brockest B . Process evaluation of bringing nutrition screening to seniors in Canada (BNSS). Can J Diet Pract Res. 2007; 68(2):86-91. DOI: 10.3148/68.2.2007.86. View