» Articles » PMID: 21364757

Performance of LED-based Fluorescence Microscopy to Diagnose Tuberculosis in a Peripheral Health Centre in Nairobi

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2011 Mar 3
PMID 21364757
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Sputum microscopy is the only tuberculosis (TB) diagnostic available at peripheral levels of care in resource limited countries. Its sensitivity is low, particularly in high HIV prevalence settings. Fluorescence microscopy (FM) can improve performance of microscopy and with the new light emitting diode (LED) technologies could be appropriate for peripheral settings. The study aimed to compare the performance of LED-FM versus Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) microscopy and to assess feasibility of LED-FM at a low level of care in a high HIV prevalence country.

Methods: A prospective study was conducted in an urban health clinic in Nairobi, Kenya. Three sputum specimens were collected over 2 days from suspected TB patients. Each sample was processed with Auramine O and ZN methods and a 4(th) specimen was collected for TB culture reference standard. Auramine smears were read using the same microscope, equipped with the FluoLED™ fluorescence illuminator. Inter-reader agreement, reading time and technicians' acceptability assessed feasibility.

Results: 497 patients were included and 1394 specimens were collected. The detection yields of LED-FM and ZN microscopy were 20.3% and 20.6% (p = 0.64), respectively. Sensitivity was 73.2% for LED-FM and 72% for ZN microscopy, p = 0.32. It was 96.7% and 95.9% for specificity, p = 0.53. Inter-reader agreement was high (kappa = 0.9). Mean reading time was three times faster than ZN microscopy with very good acceptance by technicians.

Conclusions: Although it did not increase sensitivity, the faster reading time combined with very good acceptance and ease of use supports the introduction of LED-FM at the peripheral laboratory level of high TB and HIV burden countries.

Citing Articles

Diagnostic efficacy of Light-Emitting Diode (LED) Fluorescence based Microscope for the diagnosis of Tuberculous lymphadenitis.

Assefa G, Desta K, Araya S, Girma S, Mihret A, Hailu T PLoS One. 2021; 16(7):e0255146.

PMID: 34324565 PMC: 8320901. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255146.


Smear Microscopy for Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Eastern Sudan.

Shuaib Y, Khalil E, Schaible U, Wieler L, Bakheit M, Mohamed-Noor S Tuberc Res Treat. 2018; 2018:8038137.

PMID: 30013800 PMC: 6022320. DOI: 10.1155/2018/8038137.


Impact of introducing light-emitting diode fluorescence microscopy services for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis under Revised National Tuberculosis Control Program India.

Goel S, Pandey R, Kumar M, Kankaria A, Khaneja R Lung India. 2018; 35(4):307-311.

PMID: 29970769 PMC: 6034383. DOI: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_475_17.


Agreement between Direct Fluorescent Microscopy and Ziehl-Neelsen Concentration Techniques in Detection of Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Northwest Ethiopia.

Workineh M, Maru M, Seman I, Bezu Z, Negash M, Melku M Ethiop J Health Sci. 2017; 27(5):459-464.

PMID: 29217950 PMC: 5615006. DOI: 10.4314/ejhs.v27i5.3.


Glutaraldehyde test for the rapid diagnosis of pulmonary and extra-pulmonary tuberculosis in an area with high tuberculosis incidence.

Ahmed B, Manel M, Mohamed D, Jalel B Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2017; 112(11):779-784.

PMID: 29091139 PMC: 5661902. DOI: 10.1590/0074-02760160541.


References
1.
Pai M, Minion J, Steingart K, Ramsay A . New and improved tuberculosis diagnostics: evidence, policy, practice, and impact. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2010; 16(3):271-84. DOI: 10.1097/MCP.0b013e328338094f. View

2.
Mabaera B, Lauritsen J, Katamba A, Laticevschi D, Naranbat N, Rieder H . Sputum smear-positive tuberculosis: empiric evidence challenges the need for confirmatory smears. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2007; 11(9):959-64. View

3.
Bennedsen J, Larsen S . Examination for tubercle bacili by fluorescence microscopy. Scand J Respir Dis. 1966; 47(2):114-20. View

4.
Gilpin C, Kim S, Lumb R, Rieder H, Van Deun A . Critical appraisal of current recommendations and practices for tuberculosis sputum smear microscopy. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2007; 11(9):946-52. View

5.
Van Deun A, Hamid Salim A, Cooreman E, Daru P, Das A, Aung K . Scanty AFB smears: what's in a name?. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2004; 8(7):816-23. View