» Articles » PMID: 21361209

Patient-specific Radiation Dose and Cancer Risk Estimation in CT: Part II. Application to Patients

Overview
Journal Med Phys
Specialty Biophysics
Date 2011 Mar 3
PMID 21361209
Citations 55
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Current methods for estimating and reporting radiation dose from CT examinations are largely patient-generic; the body size and hence dose variation from patient to patient is not reflected. Furthermore, the current protocol designs rely on dose as a surrogate for the risk of cancer incidence, neglecting the strong dependence of risk on age and gender. The purpose of this study was to develop a method for estimating patient-specific radiation dose and cancer risk from CT examinations.

Methods: The study included two patients (a 5-week-old female patient and a 12-year-old male patient), who underwent 64-slice CT examinations (LightSpeed VCT, GE Healthcare) of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis at our institution in 2006. For each patient, a nonuniform rational B-spine (NURBS) based full-body computer model was created based on the patient's clinical CT data. Large organs and structures inside the image volume were individually segmented and modeled. Other organs were created by transforming an existing adult male or female full-body computer model (developed from visible human data) to match the framework defined by the segmented organs, referencing the organ volume and anthropometry data in ICRP Publication 89. A Monte Carlo program previously developed and validated for dose simulation on the LightSpeed VCT scanner was used to estimate patient-specific organ dose, from which effective dose and risks of cancer incidence were derived. Patient-specific organ dose and effective dose were compared with patient-generic CT dose quantities in current clinical use: the volume-weighted CT dose index (CTDIvol) and the effective dose derived from the dose-length product (DLP).

Results: The effective dose for the CT examination of the newborn patient (5.7 mSv) was higher but comparable to that for the CT examination of the teenager patient (4.9 mSv) due to the size-based clinical CT protocols at our institution, which employ lower scan techniques for smaller patients. However, the overall risk of cancer incidence attributable to the CT examination was much higher for the newborn (2.4 in 1000) than for the teenager (0.7 in 1000). For the two pediatric-aged patients in our study, CTDIvol underestimated dose to large organs in the scan coverage by 30%-48%. The effective dose derived from DLP using published conversion coefficients differed from that calculated using patient-specific organ dose values by -57% to 13%, when the tissue weighting factors of ICRP 60 were used, and by -63% to 28%, when the tissue weighting factors of ICRP 103 were used.

Conclusions: It is possible to estimate patient-specific radiation dose and cancer risk from CT examinations by combining a validated Monte Carlo program with patient-specific anatomical models that are derived from the patients' clinical CT data and supplemented by transformed models of reference adults. With the construction of a large library of patient-specific computer models encompassing patients of all ages and weight percentiles, dose and risk can be estimated for any patient prior to or after a CT examination. Such information may aid in decisions for image utilization and can further guide the design and optimization of CT technologies and scan protocols.

Citing Articles

Optimization of abdominal CT based on a model of total risk minimization by putting radiation risk in perspective with imaging benefit.

Ria F, Zhang A, Lerebours R, Erkanli A, Abadi E, Marin D Commun Med (Lond). 2024; 4(1):272.

PMID: 39702791 PMC: 11659579. DOI: 10.1038/s43856-024-00674-w.


Evaluating Factors Affecting Mean Glandular Dose in Mammography: Insights from a Retrospective Study in Dubai.

Noor K, Norsuddin N, Abdul Karim M, Isa I, Ulaganathan V Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(22).

PMID: 39594234 PMC: 11593162. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14222568.


Radiation Dose during Digital Subtraction Angiography of the Brain-The Influence of Examination Parameters and Patient Factors on the Dose.

Modlinska S, Kufel J, Janik M, Czogalik L, Dudek P, Rojek M Brain Sci. 2024; 14(8).

PMID: 39199491 PMC: 11352881. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14080799.


Optimizing CT Abdomen-Pelvis Scan Radiation Dose: Examining the Role of Body Metrics (Waist Circumference, Hip Circumference, Abdominal Fat, and Body Mass Index) in Dose Efficiency.

Almohammed H, Elshami W, Hamd Z, Abuzaid M Tomography. 2024; 10(5):643-653.

PMID: 38787009 PMC: 11126040. DOI: 10.3390/tomography10050049.


Characterizing imaging radiation risk in a population of 8918 patients with recurrent imaging for a better effective dose.

Ria F, Rehani M, Samei E Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):6240.

PMID: 38485712 PMC: 10940310. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-56516-1.


References
1.
Lee C, Lee C, Williams J, Bolch W . Whole-body voxel phantoms of paediatric patients--UF Series B. Phys Med Biol. 2006; 51(18):4649-61. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/18/013. View

2.
Petoussi-Henss N, Zanki M, Fill U, Regulla D . The GSF family of voxel phantoms. Phys Med Biol. 2002; 47(1):89-106. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/47/1/307. View

3.
Christner J, Kofler J, McCollough C . Estimating effective dose for CT using dose-length product compared with using organ doses: consequences of adopting International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 103 or dual-energy scanning. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 194(4):881-9. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.3462. View

4.
Shope T, GAGNE R, Johnson G . A method for describing the doses delivered by transmission x-ray computed tomography. Med Phys. 1981; 8(4):488-95. DOI: 10.1118/1.594995. View

5.
. Basic anatomical and physiological data for use in radiological protection: reference values. A report of age- and gender-related differences in the anatomical and physiological characteristics of reference individuals. ICRP Publication 89. Ann ICRP. 2003; 32(3-4):5-265. View