» Articles » PMID: 21310945

Individual Differences in Recovery Time from Attentional Capture

Overview
Journal Psychol Sci
Specialty Psychology
Date 2011 Feb 12
PMID 21310945
Citations 96
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Working memory capacity reflects a core ability of the individual that affects performance on many cognitive tasks. Recent work has suggested that an important covariate of memory capacity is attentional control, and specifically that low-capacity individuals are more susceptible to attentional capture by distractors than high-capacity individuals are, with the latter being able to resist capture. Here, we tested an alternative account according to which all individuals are equally susceptible to attentional capture, but high-capacity individuals recover more quickly than low-capacity individuals. Using psychophysical and electrophysiological methods, we measured recovery time from attentional capture. In two experiments, we found that high- and low-capacity individuals showed equivalent attentional capture effects in the initial moments following capture, but that low-capacity individuals took much longer to recover than high-capacity individuals did. These results suggest that the poor attentional control associated with low capacity is due to slow disengagement from distractors.

Citing Articles

Reliably measuring learning-dependent distractor suppression with eye tracking.

Kim A, Gregoire L, Anderson B Behav Res Methods. 2024; 57(1):18.

PMID: 39695027 PMC: 11655588. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-024-02552-8.


Active maintenance of working memory contents affects functioning of attentional filtering.

Jung K, Han S, Min Y Psychon Bull Rev. 2024; .

PMID: 39414745 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-024-02599-w.


The differential impact of face distractors on visual working memory across encoding and delay stages.

Ye C, Xu Q, Pan Z, Nie Q, Liu Q Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024; 86(6):2029-2041.

PMID: 38822200 PMC: 11410854. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-024-02895-6.


When remembering less is more: Unfiltered items are associated with reduced memory fidelity in visual short-term memory.

Shin Y, Sheremata S Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024; 86(4):1248-1258.

PMID: 38684591 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-024-02891-w.


Reliably Measuring Learning-Dependent Distractor Suppression with Eye Tracking.

Kim A, Gregoire L, Anderson B bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38464286 PMC: 10925086. DOI: 10.1101/2024.02.23.581757.


References
1.
Fukuda K, Vogel E, Mayr U, Awh E . Quantity, not quality: the relationship between fluid intelligence and working memory capacity. Psychon Bull Rev. 2010; 17(5):673-9. PMC: 3050565. DOI: 10.3758/17.5.673. View

2.
Folk C, Remington R, Johnston J . Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1992; 18(4):1030-44. View

3.
Kane M, Bleckley M, Conway A, Engle R . A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001; 130(2):169-83. DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.130.2.169. View

4.
Folk C, Remington R, Wright J . The structure of attentional control: contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1994; 20(2):317-29. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.20.2.317. View

5.
Xu Y, Chun M . Dissociable neural mechanisms supporting visual short-term memory for objects. Nature. 2005; 440(7080):91-5. DOI: 10.1038/nature04262. View