Individual Differences in Recovery Time from Attentional Capture
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Working memory capacity reflects a core ability of the individual that affects performance on many cognitive tasks. Recent work has suggested that an important covariate of memory capacity is attentional control, and specifically that low-capacity individuals are more susceptible to attentional capture by distractors than high-capacity individuals are, with the latter being able to resist capture. Here, we tested an alternative account according to which all individuals are equally susceptible to attentional capture, but high-capacity individuals recover more quickly than low-capacity individuals. Using psychophysical and electrophysiological methods, we measured recovery time from attentional capture. In two experiments, we found that high- and low-capacity individuals showed equivalent attentional capture effects in the initial moments following capture, but that low-capacity individuals took much longer to recover than high-capacity individuals did. These results suggest that the poor attentional control associated with low capacity is due to slow disengagement from distractors.
Reliably measuring learning-dependent distractor suppression with eye tracking.
Kim A, Gregoire L, Anderson B Behav Res Methods. 2024; 57(1):18.
PMID: 39695027 PMC: 11655588. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-024-02552-8.
Active maintenance of working memory contents affects functioning of attentional filtering.
Jung K, Han S, Min Y Psychon Bull Rev. 2024; .
PMID: 39414745 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-024-02599-w.
Ye C, Xu Q, Pan Z, Nie Q, Liu Q Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024; 86(6):2029-2041.
PMID: 38822200 PMC: 11410854. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-024-02895-6.
Shin Y, Sheremata S Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024; 86(4):1248-1258.
PMID: 38684591 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-024-02891-w.
Reliably Measuring Learning-Dependent Distractor Suppression with Eye Tracking.
Kim A, Gregoire L, Anderson B bioRxiv. 2024; .
PMID: 38464286 PMC: 10925086. DOI: 10.1101/2024.02.23.581757.