» Articles » PMID: 17489300

Scope of Attention, Control of Attention, and Intelligence in Children and Adults

Overview
Journal Mem Cognit
Specialty Psychology
Date 2007 May 11
PMID 17489300
Citations 79
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recent experimentation has shown that cognitive aptitude measures are predicted by tests of the scope of an individual's attention or capacity in simple working memory tasks and also by the ability to control attention. However, these experiments do not indicate how separate or related the scope and control of attention are. An experiment with 52 children (10 to 11 years old) and 52 college students included measures of the scope and control of attention, as well as verbal and nonverbal aptitude measures. The children showed little evidence of using sophisticated attentional control, but the scope of attention predicted intelligence in that group. In adults, both the scope and control of attention varied among individuals and accounted for considerable individual variance in intelligence. About one third that variance was shared between scope an d control, and the rest was unique to one or the other. Scope and control of attention appear to be related but distinct contributors to intelligence.

Citing Articles

Modelling Working Memory Capacity: Is the Magical Number Four, Seven, or Does it Depend on What You Are Counting?.

Morra S, Patella P, Muscella L J Cogn. 2024; 7(1):60.

PMID: 39035073 PMC: 11259112. DOI: 10.5334/joc.387.


Two Attentional Processes Subserving Working Memory Differentiate Gifted and Mainstream Students.

Johnson J, Howard S, Pascual-Leone J J Cogn. 2024; 7(1):47.

PMID: 38799082 PMC: 11122698. DOI: 10.5334/joc.370.


Age-related effects on a hierarchical structure of canine cognition.

Bognar Z, Turcsan B, Farago T, Szabo D, Iotchev I, Kubinyi E Geroscience. 2024; 46(6):5843-5874.

PMID: 38512580 PMC: 11493892. DOI: 10.1007/s11357-024-01123-1.


Scoping review of dual-task interference in individuals with intellectual disability.

Pineda R, Krampe R, Vanlandewijck Y, Van Biesen D Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1223288.

PMID: 37691801 PMC: 10484534. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1223288.


Disentangling Processing and Storage Accounts of Working Memory Development in Childhood.

Superbia-Guimaraes L, Cowan N Dev Rev. 2023; 69.

PMID: 37662651 PMC: 10470321. DOI: 10.1016/j.dr.2023.101089.


References
1.
Cowan N, Barron A . Cross-modal, auditory-visual Stroop interference and possible implications for speech memory. Percept Psychophys. 1987; 41(5):393-401. DOI: 10.3758/bf03203031. View

2.
Engle R, Tuholski S, Laughlin J, Conway A . Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: a latent-variable approach. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1999; 128(3):309-331. DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.128.3.309. View

3.
Gernsbacher M . LESS SKILLED READERS HAVE LESS EFFICIENT SUPPRESSION MECHANISMS. Psychol Sci. 2014; 4(5):294-298. PMC: 4191741. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00567.x. View

4.
Daneman M, Merikle P . Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychon Bull Rev. 2013; 3(4):422-33. DOI: 10.3758/BF03214546. View

5.
Miller G . The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev. 1956; 63(2):81-97. View