Long-term Memory for Distractors: Effects of Involuntary Attention from Working Memory

Overview

Journal Mem Cognit

Specialty Psychology

Date 2023 Sep 28

PMID 37768481

Authors

Jun Moriya

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

In a visual search task, attention to task-irrelevant distractors impedes search performance. However, is it maladaptive to future performance? Here, I showed that attended distractors in a visual search task were better remembered in long-term memory (LTM) in the subsequent surprise recognition task than non-attended distractors. In four experiments, participants performed a visual search task using real-world objects of a single color. They encoded color in working memory (WM) during the task; because each object had a different color, participants directed their attention to the WM-matching colored distractor. Then, in the surprise recognition task, participants were required to indicate whether an object had been shown in the earlier visual search task, regardless of its color. The results showed that attended distractors were remembered better in LTM than non-attended distractors (Experiments 1 and 2). Moreover, the more participants directed their attention to distractors, the better they explicitly remembered them. Participants did not explicitly remember the color of the attended distractors (Experiment 3) but remembered integrated information with object and color (Experiment 4). When the color of the distractors in the recognition task was mismatched with the color in the visual search task, LTM decreased compared to color-matching distractors. These results suggest that attention to distractors impairs search for a target but is helpful in remembering distractors in LTM. When task-irrelevant distractors become task-relevant information in the future, their attention becomes beneficial.

References

Amer T, Campbell K, Hasher L . Cognitive Control As a Double-Edged Sword. Trends Cogn Sci. 2016; 20(12):905-915. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.10.002. View

Amer T, Ngo K, Weeks J, Hasher L . Spontaneous Distractor Reactivation With Age: Evidence for Bound Target-Distractor Representations in Memory. Psychol Sci. 2020; 31(10):1315-1324. DOI: 10.1177/0956797620951125. View

Awh E, Belopolsky A, Theeuwes J . Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy. Trends Cogn Sci. 2012; 16(8):437-43. PMC: 3426354. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.06.010. View

Balaban H, Assaf D, Arad Meir M, Luria R . Different features of real-world objects are represented in a dependent manner in long-term memory. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019; 149(7):1275-1293. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000716. View

Brady T, Konkle T, Gill J, Oliva A, Alvarez G . Visual long-term memory has the same limit on fidelity as visual working memory. Psychol Sci. 2013; 24(6):981-90. DOI: 10.1177/0956797612465439. View

Ecker U, Maybery M, Zimmer H . Binding of intrinsic and extrinsic features in working memory. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012; 142(1):218-234. DOI: 10.1037/a0028732. View

Ecker U, Zimmer H, Groh-Bordin C . Color and context: an ERP study on intrinsic and extrinsic feature binding in episodic memory. Mem Cognit. 2007; 35(6):1483-501. DOI: 10.3758/bf03193618. View

Eysenck M, Derakshan N, Santos R, Calvo M . Anxiety and cognitive performance: attentional control theory. Emotion. 2007; 7(2):336-53. DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.336. View

Foerster R, Schneider W . Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner. Cognition. 2017; 172:37-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.12.002. View

10.

Fougnie D, Alvarez G . Object features fail independently in visual working memory: evidence for a probabilistic feature-store model. J Vis. 2011; 11(12). PMC: 3279121. DOI: 10.1167/11.12.3. View

11.

Fougnie D, Cormiea S, Alvarez G . Object-based benefits without object-based representations. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012; 142(3):621-6. DOI: 10.1037/a0030300. View

12.

Fukuda K, Vogel E . Individual differences in recovery time from attentional capture. Psychol Sci. 2011; 22(3):361-8. PMC: 4494671. DOI: 10.1177/0956797611398493. View

13.

Fukuda K, Vogel E . Visual short-term memory capacity predicts the "bandwidth" of visual long-term memory encoding. Mem Cognit. 2019; 47(8):1481-1497. PMC: 6823324. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-019-00954-0. View

14.

Gaspelin N, Luck S . The Role of Inhibition in Avoiding Distraction by Salient Stimuli. Trends Cogn Sci. 2017; 22(1):79-92. PMC: 5742040. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.11.001. View

15.

Guevara Pinto J, Papesh M . Incidental memory following rapid object processing: The role of attention allocation strategies. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019; 45(9):1174-1190. PMC: 7202240. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000664. View

16.

Jensen M, Yao R, Street W, Simons D . Change blindness and inattentional blindness. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2015; 2(5):529-546. DOI: 10.1002/wcs.130. View

17.

Kerzel D, Andres M . Object features reinstated from episodic memory guide attentional selection. Cognition. 2020; 197:104158. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104158. View

18.

Kerzel D, Huynh Cong S . Attentional guidance by irrelevant features depends on their successful encoding into working memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2021; 47(9):1182-1191. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000936. View

19.

Kuhbandner C . Real-World Objects Are Represented in Visual Long-Term Memory Both as Unbound Features and as Bound Objects. Front Psychol. 2020; 11:580667. PMC: 7751091. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.580667. View

20.

Luck S, Gaspelin N, Folk C, Remington R, Theeuwes J . Progress Toward Resolving the Attentional Capture Debate. Vis cogn. 2021; 29(1):1-21. PMC: 7872136. DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2020.1848949. View