» Articles » PMID: 21304001

Phase I Clinical Study of Seneca Valley Virus (SVV-001), a Replication-competent Picornavirus, in Advanced Solid Tumors with Neuroendocrine Features

Overview
Journal Clin Cancer Res
Specialty Oncology
Date 2011 Feb 10
PMID 21304001
Citations 84
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Seneca Valley Virus (SVV-001) is a novel naturally occurring replication-competent picornavirus with potent and selective tropism for neuroendocrine cancer cell types, including small cell lung cancer. We conducted a first-in-human, first-in-class phase I clinical trial of this agent in patients with cancers with neuroendocrine features, including small cell lung cancer.

Experimental Design: Clinical evaluation of single intravenous doses in patients with cancers with neuroendocrine features was performed across five log-increments from 10(7) to 10(11) vp/kg. Toxicity, viral titers and clearance, neutralizing antibody development, and tumor response were assessed.

Results: A total of 30 patients were treated with SVV-001, including six with small cell carcinoma at the lowest dose of 10(7) vp/kg. SVV-001 was well tolerated, with no dose-limiting toxicities observed in any dose cohort. Viral clearance was documented in all subjects and correlated temporally with development of antiviral antibodies. Evidence of in vivo intratumoral viral replication was observed among patients with small cell carcinoma, with peak viral titers estimated to be >10(3)-fold higher than the administered dose. One patient with previously progressive chemorefractory small cell lung cancer remained progression-free for 10 months after SVV-001 administration, and is alive over 3 years after treatment.

Conclusions: Intravenous SVV-001 administration in patients is well tolerated at doses up to 10(11) vp/kg, with predictable viral clearance kinetics, intratumoral viral replication, and evidence of antitumor activity in patients with small cell lung cancer. Phase II clinical evaluation in small cell lung cancer is warranted, and has been initiated.

Citing Articles

Elevated expression of gene in tumors is a poor prognostic biomarker for patients with bladder cancer.

Franco L, Arunachalam S, Chauhan A, Kareff S, Hallenbeck P Front Mol Biosci. 2025; 11:1520223.

PMID: 39917181 PMC: 11798775. DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2024.1520223.


Evolving Immunotherapy Strategies in Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

Urman A, Schonman I, De Jesus-Acosta A Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2025; 26(2):92-102.

PMID: 39843688 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-024-01283-4.


Virus nanotechnology for intratumoural immunotherapy.

Omole A, Zhao Z, Chang-Liao S, de Oliveira J, Boone C, Sutorus L Nat Rev Bioeng. 2024; 2(11):916-929.

PMID: 39698315 PMC: 11655125. DOI: 10.1038/s44222-024-00231-z.


VP3 protein of Senecavirus A promotes viral IRES-driven translation and attenuates innate immunity by specifically relocalizing hnRNPA2B1.

Li L, Li X, Zhong H, Li M, Wan B, He W J Virol. 2024; 98(9):e0122724.

PMID: 39207136 PMC: 11406996. DOI: 10.1128/jvi.01227-24.


Oncolytic Virus Senecavirus A Inhibits Hepatocellular Carcinoma Proliferation and Growth by Inducing Cell Cycle Arrest and Apoptosis.

Gong T, Liu X, Li Q, Branch D, Loriamini M, Wen W J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2024; 12(8):713-725.

PMID: 39130624 PMC: 11310753. DOI: 10.14218/JCTH.2024.00125.


References
1.
Hales L, Knowles N, Reddy P, Xu L, Hay C, Hallenbeck P . Complete genome sequence analysis of Seneca Valley virus-001, a novel oncolytic picornavirus. J Gen Virol. 2008; 89(Pt 5):1265-1275. DOI: 10.1099/vir.0.83570-0. View

2.
Reddy P, Burroughs K, Hales L, Ganesh S, Jones B, Idamakanti N . Seneca Valley virus, a systemically deliverable oncolytic picornavirus, and the treatment of neuroendocrine cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007; 99(21):1623-33. PMC: 5261858. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djm198. View

3.
Wadhwa L, Hurwitz M, Chevez-Barrios P, Hurwitz R . Treatment of invasive retinoblastoma in a murine model using an oncolytic picornavirus. Cancer Res. 2007; 67(22):10653-6. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2352. View

4.
Brodsky R, Jones R . Intensive immunosuppression with high dose cyclophosphamide but without stem cell rescue for severe autoimmunity: advantages and disadvantages. Autoimmunity. 2008; 41(8):596-600. PMC: 3100525. DOI: 10.1080/08916930802197206. View

5.
Perini P, Calabrese M, Rinaldi L, Gallo P . Cyclophosphamide-based combination therapies for autoimmunity. Neurol Sci. 2008; 29 Suppl 2:S233-4. DOI: 10.1007/s10072-008-0947-9. View