» Articles » PMID: 21278858

Predictive Spelling with a P300-based Brain-computer Interface: Increasing the Rate of Communication

Overview
Date 2011 Feb 1
PMID 21278858
Citations 44
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study compared a conventional P300 speller brain-computer interface (BCI) to one used in conjunction with a predictive spelling program. Performance differences in accuracy, bit rate, selections per minute, and output characters per minute (OCM) were examined. An 8×9 matrix of letters, numbers, and other keyboard commands was used. Participants (n = 24) were required to correctly complete the same 58 character sentence (i.e., correcting for errors) using the predictive speller (PS) and the non-predictive speller (NS), counterbalanced. The PS produced significantly higher OCMs than the NS. Time to complete the task in the PS condition was 12min 43sec as compared to 20min 20sec in the NS condition. Despite the marked improvement in overall output, accuracy was significantly higher in the NS paradigm. P300 amplitudes were significantly larger in the NS than in the PS paradigm; which is attributed to increased workload and task demands. These results demonstrate the potential efficacy of predictive spelling in the context of BCI.

Citing Articles

On the role of generative artificial intelligence in the development of brain-computer interfaces.

Eldawlatly S BMC Biomed Eng. 2024; 6(1):4.

PMID: 38698495 PMC: 11064240. DOI: 10.1186/s42490-024-00080-2.


Effect of Stimulus Size in a Visual ERP-Based BCI under RSVP.

Fernandez-Rodriguez A, Darves-Bornoz A, Velasco-Alvarez F, Ron-Angevin R Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(23).

PMID: 36502205 PMC: 9741214. DOI: 10.3390/s22239505.


Extending Brain-Computer Interface Access with a Multilingual Language Model in the P300 Speller.

Loizidou P, Rios E, Marttini A, Keluo-Udeke O, Soetedjo J, Belay J Brain Comput Interfaces (Abingdon). 2022; 9(1):36-48.

PMID: 35574291 PMC: 9094140. DOI: 10.1080/2326263x.2021.1993426.


Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) Control of a Virtual Assistant in a Smartphone to Manage Messaging Applications.

Velasco-Alvarez F, Fernandez-Rodriguez A, Vizcaino-Martin F, Diaz-Estrella A, Ron-Angevin R Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21(11).

PMID: 34073602 PMC: 8199460. DOI: 10.3390/s21113716.


Different effects of using pictures as stimuli in a P300 brain-computer interface under rapid serial visual presentation or row-column paradigm.

Fernandez-Rodriguez A, Medina-Julia M, Velasco-Alvarez F, Ron-Angevin R Med Biol Eng Comput. 2021; 59(4):869-881.

PMID: 33742353 DOI: 10.1007/s11517-021-02340-y.


References
1.
Sellers E, Krusienski D, McFarland D, Vaughan T, Wolpaw J . A P300 event-related potential brain-computer interface (BCI): the effects of matrix size and inter stimulus interval on performance. Biol Psychol. 2006; 73(3):242-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2006.04.007. View

2.
Allison B, Pineda J . ERPs evoked by different matrix sizes: implications for a brain computer interface (BCI) system. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2003; 11(2):110-3. DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2003.814448. View

3.
Cohen J, Polich J . On the number of trials needed for P300. Int J Psychophysiol. 1997; 25(3):249-55. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8760(96)00743-x. View

4.
Kunst C . Complex genetics of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Am J Hum Genet. 2004; 75(6):933-47. PMC: 1182156. DOI: 10.1086/426001. View

5.
Farwell L, Donchin E . Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1988; 70(6):510-23. DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(88)90149-6. View