» Articles » PMID: 31354802

Impact of Speller Size on a Visual P300 Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) System Under Two Conditions of Constraint for Eye Movement

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2019 Jul 30
PMID 31354802
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The vast majority of P300-based brain-computer interface (BCI) systems are based on the well-known P300 speller presented by Farwell and Donchin for communication purposes and an alternative to people with neuromuscular disabilities, such as impaired eye movement. The purpose of the present work is to study the effect of speller size on P300-based BCI usability, measured in terms of effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction under overt and covert attention conditions. To this end, twelve participants used three speller sizes under both attentional conditions to spell 12 symbols. The results indicated that the speller size had, in both attentional conditions, a significant influence on performance. In both conditions (covert and overt), the best performances were obtained with the small and medium speller sizes, both being the most effective. The speller size did not significantly affect workload on the three speller sizes. In contrast, covert attention condition produced very high workload due to the increased resources expended to complete the task. Regarding users' preferences, significant differences were obtained between speller sizes. The small speller size was considered as the most complex, the most stressful, the less comfortable, and the most tiring. The medium speller size was always considered in the medium rank, which is the speller size that was evaluated less frequently and, for each dimension, the worst one. In this sense, the medium and the large speller sizes were considered as the most satisfactory. Finally, the medium speller size was the one to which the three standard dimensions were collected: high effectiveness, high efficiency, and high satisfaction. This work demonstrates that the speller size is an important parameter to consider in improving the usability of P300 BCI for communication purposes. The obtained results showed that using the proposed medium speller size, performance and satisfaction could be improved.

Citing Articles

Comparison of Two Paradigms Based on Stimulation with Images in a Spelling Brain-Computer Interface.

Ron-Angevin R, Fernandez-Rodriguez A, Dupont C, Maigrot J, Meunier J, Tavard H Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(3).

PMID: 36772343 PMC: 9920351. DOI: 10.3390/s23031304.


Effect of Stimulus Size in a Visual ERP-Based BCI under RSVP.

Fernandez-Rodriguez A, Darves-Bornoz A, Velasco-Alvarez F, Ron-Angevin R Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(23).

PMID: 36502205 PMC: 9741214. DOI: 10.3390/s22239505.


Artificial Intelligence Algorithms in Visual Evoked Potential-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces for Motor Rehabilitation Applications: Systematic Review and Future Directions.

Gutierrez-Martinez J, Mercado-Gutierrez J, Carvajal-Gamez B, Rosas-Trigueros J, Contreras-Martinez A Front Hum Neurosci. 2021; 15:772837.

PMID: 34899220 PMC: 8656949. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.772837.


Effects of Skin Friction on Tactile P300 Brain-Computer Interface Performance.

Mao Y, Jin J, Li S, Miao Y, Cichocki A Comput Intell Neurosci. 2021; 2021:6694310.

PMID: 33628218 PMC: 7886524. DOI: 10.1155/2021/6694310.


Single-Option P300-BCI Performance Is Affected by Visual Stimulation Conditions.

Chailloux Peguero J, Mendoza-Montoya O, Antelis J Sensors (Basel). 2020; 20(24).

PMID: 33339105 PMC: 7765532. DOI: 10.3390/s20247198.


References
1.
Ron-Angevin R, Varona-Moya S, da Silva-Sauer L . Initial test of a T9-like P300-based speller by an ALS patient. J Neural Eng. 2015; 12(4):046023. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/12/4/046023. View

2.
Kececi H, Degirmenci Y, Atakay S . Habituation and dishabituation of P300. Cogn Behav Neurol. 2006; 19(3):130-4. DOI: 10.1097/01.wnn.0000213911.80019.c1. View

3.
Sellers E, Krusienski D, McFarland D, Vaughan T, Wolpaw J . A P300 event-related potential brain-computer interface (BCI): the effects of matrix size and inter stimulus interval on performance. Biol Psychol. 2006; 73(3):242-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2006.04.007. View

4.
Allison B, Pineda J . ERPs evoked by different matrix sizes: implications for a brain computer interface (BCI) system. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2003; 11(2):110-3. DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2003.814448. View

5.
Marchetti M, Priftis K . Effectiveness of the P3-speller in brain-computer interfaces for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neuroeng. 2014; 7:12. PMC: 4013458. DOI: 10.3389/fneng.2014.00012. View