» Articles » PMID: 21270640

Medical and Graduate Students' Attitudes Toward Personal Genomics

Overview
Journal Genet Med
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Genetics
Date 2011 Jan 29
PMID 21270640
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Medical schools are being approached by direct-to-consumer genotyping companies about genotyping faculty or trainees as a method to "teach" them about the potential implications of genotyping. In thinking about the future incorporation of genotyping into a graduate level genetics course, the purpose of this study was 2-fold: first, to assess knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs of students toward personal genomics as it related to themselves as both as customers and future physicians and as it related to consumers at large, and second, to determine the impact of the course (as taught without genotyping) on knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs.

Methods: We surveyed first-year medical students and graduate students before and after a core genetics course.

Results: After the course, students were less likely to believe that genotyping information would be useful to physicians, patients, or consumers; genotyping would provide information to improve their own personal health; or personal genomic testing services are diagnostic of medical conditions. They were more likely to answer knowledge questions accurately after the course but still had difficulty with clinical interpretation. Despite these changes, a slight majority of students were, and remained, interested in undergoing genotyping themselves. Of note, the number who believed genotyping "would help them understand genetic concepts better than someone else's data" decreased. General curiosity was the most commonly chosen reason for interest in undergoing genotyping, and approximately 50% of respondents expressed concern about confidentiality of results.

Conclusions: In conclusion, even without the genotyping process, an educational program about genotyping increased knowledge, particularly about the clinical limitations of genotyping, but student interest in genotyping did not significantly change. Institutions thinking about offering genotyping to their students as part of a learning experience should consider the pros and cons of doing so.

Citing Articles

Perspectives on Consumer and Clinical Genetic Testing Education among Medical Students in West Texas.

Kopel J, Brower G J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2022; 12(3):28-32.

PMID: 35711394 PMC: 9195083. DOI: 10.55729/2000-9666.1050.


Genomics Education in the Era of Personal Genomics: Academic, Professional, and Public Considerations.

Whitley K, Tueller J, Weber K Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21(3).

PMID: 31991576 PMC: 7037382. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21030768.


Perceptions of students in health and molecular life sciences regarding pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine.

Mahmutovic L, Akcesme B, Durakovic C, Akcesme F, Maric A, Adilovic M Hum Genomics. 2018; 12(1):50.

PMID: 30424805 PMC: 6234656. DOI: 10.1186/s40246-018-0182-2.


Implementing Clinical Pharmacogenomics in the Classroom: Student Pharmacist Impressions of an Educational Intervention Including Personal Genotyping.

Frick A, Benton C, Suzuki O, Dong O, Howard R, El-Sabae H Pharmacy (Basel). 2018; 6(4).

PMID: 30360487 PMC: 6306770. DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy6040115.


Impacts of incorporating personal genome sequencing into graduate genomics education: a longitudinal study over three course years.

Linderman M, Sanderson S, Bashir A, Diaz G, Kasarskis A, Zinberg R BMC Med Genomics. 2018; 11(1):5.

PMID: 29382336 PMC: 5791365. DOI: 10.1186/s12920-018-0319-0.