Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review

Overview

Journal J Med Internet Res

Publisher JMIR Publications

Specialty Medical Informatics

Date 2015 Dec 19

PMID 26677835

Citations 52

Authors

Loredana Covolo

Sara Rubinelli

Elisabetta Ceretti

Umberto Gelatti

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Direct-to-consumer genetic tests (DTC-GT) are easily purchased through the Internet, independent of a physician referral or approval for testing, allowing the retrieval of genetic information outside the clinical context. There is a broad debate about the testing validity, their impact on individuals, and what people know and perceive about them.

Objective: The aim of this review was to collect evidence on DTC-GT from a comprehensive perspective that unravels the complexity of the phenomenon.

Methods: A systematic search was carried out through PubMed, Web of Knowledge, and Embase, in addition to Google Scholar according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist with the key term "Direct-to-consumer genetic test."

Results: In the final sample, 118 articles were identified. Articles were summarized in five categories according to their focus on (1) knowledge of, attitude toward use of, and perception of DTC-GT (n=37), (2) the impact of genetic risk information on users (n=37), (3) the opinion of health professionals (n=20), (4) the content of websites selling DTC-GT (n=16), and (5) the scientific evidence and clinical utility of the tests (n=14). Most of the articles analyzed the attitude, knowledge, and perception of DTC-GT, highlighting an interest in using DTC-GT, along with the need for a health care professional to help interpret the results. The articles investigating the content analysis of the websites selling these tests are in agreement that the information provided by the companies about genetic testing is not completely comprehensive for the consumer. Given that risk information can modify consumers' health behavior, there are surprisingly few studies carried out on actual consumers and they do not confirm the overall concerns on the possible impact of DTC-GT. Data from studies that investigate the quality of the tests offered confirm that they are not informative, have little predictive power, and do not measure genetic risk appropriately.

Conclusions: The impact of DTC-GT on consumers' health perceptions and behaviors is an emerging concern. However, negative effects on consumers or health benefits have yet to be observed. Nevertheless, since the online market of DTC-GT is expected to grow, it is important to remain aware of a possible impact.

Citing Articles

How eHealth use and cancer information-seeking influence older adults' acceptance of genetic testing: Mediating roles of PIGI and cancer worry.

Zhu Y, Xiao Q, Ao M, Zhao X Digit Health. 2025; 11:20552076251317658.

PMID: 39896267 PMC: 11786290. DOI: 10.1177/20552076251317658.

Motivations, perceptions and impacts of direct-to-consumer genetic testing among users in Brazil.

Penna L, Amemiya R, Pires T, Bonasser L, Carvalheira L, Fridman C J Community Genet. 2024; .

PMID: 39601966 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-024-00755-2.

Internet-Based Abnormal Chromosomal Diagnosis During Pregnancy Using a Noninvasive Innovative Approach to Detecting Chromosomal Abnormalities in the Fetus: Scoping Review.

Oyovwi M, Ohwin E, Rotu R, Olowe T JMIR Bioinform Biotechnol. 2024; 5:e58439.

PMID: 39412876 PMC: 11525087. DOI: 10.2196/58439.

Ethical Aspects of Human Genome Research in Sports-A Narrative Review.

Bojarczuk A Genes (Basel). 2024; 15(9).

PMID: 39336807 PMC: 11430849. DOI: 10.3390/genes15091216.

Policy Guidance for Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Services: Framework Development Study.

Onstwedder S, Jansen M, Cornel M, Rigter T J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e47389.

PMID: 39018558 PMC: 11292153. DOI: 10.2196/47389.

References

Gollust S, Wilfond B, Hull S . Direct-to-consumer sales of genetic services on the Internet. Genet Med. 2003; 5(4):332-7. PMC: 4822819. DOI: 10.1097/01.GIM.0000076972.83711.48. View

Goddard K, Moore C, Ottman D, Szegda K, Bradley L, Khoury M . Awareness and use of direct-to-consumer nutrigenomic tests, United States, 2006. Genet Med. 2007; 9(8):510-7. DOI: 10.1097/gim.0b013e31812e6ac3. View

Hudson K, Javitt G, Burke W, Byers P . ASHG Statement* on direct-to-consumer genetic testing in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 110(6):1392-5. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000292086.98514.8b. View

ONeill S, White D, Sanderson S, Lipkus I, Bepler G, Bastian L . The feasibility of online genetic testing for lung cancer susceptibility: uptake of a web-based protocol and decision outcomes. Genet Med. 2008; 10(2):121-30. DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e31815f8e06. View

Sanderson S, Wardle J . Associations between anticipated reactions to genetic test results and interest in genetic testing: will self-selection reduce the potential for harm?. Genet Test. 2008; 12(1):59-66. DOI: 10.1089/gte.2007.0047. View

Janssens A, Gwinn M, Bradley L, Oostra B, Van Duijn C, Khoury M . A critical appraisal of the scientific basis of commercial genomic profiles used to assess health risks and personalize health interventions. Am J Hum Genet. 2008; 82(3):593-9. PMC: 2427295. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2007.12.020. View

Draugalis J, Coons S, Plaza C . Best practices for survey research reports: a synopsis for authors and reviewers. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008; 72(1):11. PMC: 2254236. DOI: 10.5688/aj720111. View

Geransar R, Einsiedel E . Evaluating online direct-to-consumer marketing of genetic tests: informed choices or buyers beware?. Genet Test. 2008; 12(1):13-23. DOI: 10.1089/gte.2007.0024. View

Sterling R . The on-line promotion and sale of nutrigenomic services. Genet Med. 2008; 10(11):784-96. DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e31818c0441. View

10.

Goddard K, Robitaille J, Dowling N, Parrado A, Fishman J, Bradley L . Health-related direct-to-consumer genetic tests: a public health assessment and analysis of practices related to Internet-based tests for risk of thrombosis. Public Health Genomics. 2008; 12(2):92-104. PMC: 2790792. DOI: 10.1159/000176794. View

11.

Goddard K, Duquette D, Zlot A, Johnson J, Annis-Emeott A, Lee P . Public awareness and use of direct-to-consumer genetic tests: results from 3 state population-based surveys, 2006. Am J Public Health. 2008; 99(3):442-5. PMC: 2661444. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.131631. View

12.

Ohata T, Tsuchiya A, Watanabe M, Sumida T, Takada F . Physicians' opinion for 'new' genetic testing in Japan. J Hum Genet. 2009; 54(4):203-8. DOI: 10.1038/jhg.2009.11. View

13.

Borry P, Howard H, Senecal K, Avard D . Health-related direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a review of companies' policies with regard to genetic testing in minors. Fam Cancer. 2009; 9(1):51-9. DOI: 10.1007/s10689-009-9253-9. View

14.

McBride C, Hensley Alford S, Reid R, Larson E, Baxevanis A, Brody L . Characteristics of users of online personalized genomic risk assessments: implications for physician-patient interactions. Genet Med. 2009; 11(8):582-7. PMC: 3341609. DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181b22c3a. View

15.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009; 6(7):e1000097. PMC: 2707599. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097. View

16.

Mihaescu R, van Hoek M, Sijbrands E, Uitterlinden A, Witteman J, Hofman A . Evaluation of risk prediction updates from commercial genome-wide scans. Genet Med. 2009; 11(8):588-94. DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181b13a4f. View

17.

Wilde A, Meiser B, Mitchell P, Schofield P . Public interest in predictive genetic testing, including direct-to-consumer testing, for susceptibility to major depression: preliminary findings. Eur J Hum Genet. 2009; 18(1):47-51. PMC: 2987161. DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2009.138. View

18.

Ng P, Murray S, Levy S, Venter J . An agenda for personalized medicine. Nature. 2009; 461(7265):724-6. DOI: 10.1038/461724a. View

19.

Ries N, Hyde-Lay R, Caulfield T . Willingness to pay for genetic testing: a study of attitudes in a Canadian population. Public Health Genomics. 2009; 13(5):292-300. DOI: 10.1159/000253120. View

20.

McGuire A, Diaz C, Wang T, Hilsenbeck S . Social networkers' attitudes toward direct-to-consumer personal genome testing. Am J Bioeth. 2009; 9(6-7):3-10. PMC: 2792120. DOI: 10.1080/15265160902928209. View