» Articles » PMID: 21209939

The Effect of Algorithms on Copy Number Variant Detection

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2011 Jan 7
PMID 21209939
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The detection of copy number variants (CNVs) and the results of CNV-disease association studies rely on how CNVs are defined, and because array-based technologies can only infer CNVs, CNV-calling algorithms can produce vastly different findings. Several authors have noted the large-scale variability between CNV-detection methods, as well as the substantial false positive and false negative rates associated with those methods. In this study, we use variations of four common algorithms for CNV detection (PennCNV, QuantiSNP, HMMSeg, and cnvPartition) and two definitions of overlap (any overlap and an overlap of at least 40% of the smaller CNV) to illustrate the effects of varying algorithms and definitions of overlap on CNV discovery.

Methodology And Principal Findings: We used a 56 K Illumina genotyping array enriched for CNV regions to generate hybridization intensities and allele frequencies for 48 Caucasian schizophrenia cases and 48 age-, ethnicity-, and gender-matched control subjects. No algorithm found a difference in CNV burden between the two groups. However, the total number of CNVs called ranged from 102 to 3,765 across algorithms. The mean CNV size ranged from 46 kb to 787 kb, and the average number of CNVs per subject ranged from 1 to 39. The number of novel CNVs not previously reported in normal subjects ranged from 0 to 212.

Conclusions And Significance: Motivated by the availability of multiple publicly available genome-wide SNP arrays, investigators are conducting numerous analyses to identify putative additional CNVs in complex genetic disorders. However, the number of CNVs identified in array-based studies, and whether these CNVs are novel or valid, will depend on the algorithm(s) used. Thus, given the variety of methods used, there will be many false positives and false negatives. Both guidelines for the identification of CNVs inferred from high-density arrays and the establishment of a gold standard for validation of CNVs are needed.

Citing Articles

The genetic landscape of autism spectrum disorder in the Middle Eastern population.

Al-Sarraj Y, Taha R, Al-Dous E, Ahram D, Abbasi S, Abuazab E Front Genet. 2024; 15:1363849.

PMID: 38572415 PMC: 10987745. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1363849.


Pharmacogenomic variation in the Malagasy population: implications for the antimalarial drug primaquine metabolism.

Cramer E, Bartlett J, Chan E, Gaedigk A, Ratsimbasoa A, Mehlotra R Pharmacogenomics. 2023; 24(11):583-597.

PMID: 37551613 PMC: 10621762. DOI: 10.2217/pgs-2023-0091.


CNest: A novel copy number association discovery method uncovers 862 new associations from 200,629 whole-exome sequence datasets in the UK Biobank.

Fitzgerald T, Birney E Cell Genom. 2023; 2(8):100167.

PMID: 36779085 PMC: 9903682. DOI: 10.1016/j.xgen.2022.100167.


Similar Rates of Deleterious Copy Number Variants in Early-Onset Psychosis and Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Brownstein C, Douard E, Mollon J, Smith R, Hojlo M, Das A Am J Psychiatry. 2022; 179(11):853-861.

PMID: 36000218 PMC: 9633349. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.21111175.


Analysis of copy number variation in dogs implicates genomic structural variation in the development of anterior cruciate ligament rupture.

Binversie E, Baker L, Engelman C, Hao Z, Moran J, Piazza A PLoS One. 2020; 15(12):e0244075.

PMID: 33382735 PMC: 7774950. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244075.


References
1.
. Rare chromosomal deletions and duplications increase risk of schizophrenia. Nature. 2008; 455(7210):237-41. PMC: 3912847. DOI: 10.1038/nature07239. View

2.
Colella S, Yau C, Taylor J, Mirza G, Butler H, Clouston P . QuantiSNP: an Objective Bayes Hidden-Markov Model to detect and accurately map copy number variation using SNP genotyping data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007; 35(6):2013-25. PMC: 1874617. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkm076. View

3.
Day N, Hemmaplardh A, Thurman R, Stamatoyannopoulos J, Noble W . Unsupervised segmentation of continuous genomic data. Bioinformatics. 2007; 23(11):1424-6. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm096. View

4.
Cooper G, Zerr T, Kidd J, Eichler E, Nickerson D . Systematic assessment of copy number variant detection via genome-wide SNP genotyping. Nat Genet. 2008; 40(10):1199-203. PMC: 2759751. DOI: 10.1038/ng.236. View

5.
Khoury M, Bertram L, Boffetta P, Butterworth A, Chanock S, Dolan S . Genome-wide association studies, field synopses, and the development of the knowledge base on genetic variation and human diseases. Am J Epidemiol. 2009; 170(3):269-79. PMC: 2714948. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwp119. View