» Articles » PMID: 21134602

Ca 2+-induced Self-assembly in Designed Peptides with Optimally Spaced Gamma-carboxyglutamic Acid Residues

Overview
Journal J Inorg Biochem
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2010 Dec 8
PMID 21134602
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We have previously elucidated a new paradigm for the metal ion-induced helix-helix assembly in the natural γ-carboxyglutamic acid (Gla)-containing class of conantokin (con) peptides, typified by con-G and a variant of con-T, con-T[K7Gla], independent of the hydrophobic effect. In these "metallo-zipper" structures, Gla residues spaced at i, i+4, i+7, i+11 intervals, which is similar to the arrangement of a and d residues in typical heptads of coiled-coils, coordinate with Ca(2+) and form specific antiparallel helical dimers. In order to evaluate the common role of Gla residues in peptide self-assembly, we extend herein the same Gla arrangement to designed peptides: NH(2)-(γLSγEAK)(3)-CONH(2) (peptide 1) and NH(2)-γLSγEAKγLSγQANγLSγKAE-CONH(2) (peptide 2). Peptide 1 and peptide 2 exhibit no helicity alone, but undergo structural transitions to helical conformations in the presence of a variety of divalent cations. Sedimentation equilibrium ultracentrifugation analyses showed that peptide 1 and peptide 2 form helical dimers in the presence of Ca(2+), but not Mg(2+). Folding and thiol-disulfide rearrangement assays with Cys-containing peptide variants indicated that the helical dimers are mixtures of antiparallel and parallel dimers, which is different from the strict antiparallel strand orientations of con-G and con-T[K7γGla] dimers. These findings suggest that the Gla arrangement, i, i+4, i+7, i+11, i+14, plays a key role in helix formation, without a strict adherence to strand orientation of the helical dimer.

Citing Articles

A minimized human insulin-receptor-binding motif revealed in a Conus geographus venom insulin.

Menting J, Gajewiak J, MacRaild C, Chou D, Disotuar M, Smith N Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2016; 23(10):916-920.

PMID: 27617429 DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.3292.


Effect of the peptide secondary structure on the peptide amphiphile supramolecular structure and interactions.

Missirlis D, Chworos A, Fu C, Khant H, Krogstad D, Tirrell M Langmuir. 2011; 27(10):6163-70.

PMID: 21488620 PMC: 3103120. DOI: 10.1021/la200800e.

References
1.
Fairman R, Chao H, Lavoie T, Villafranca J, Matsueda G, Novotny J . Design of heterotetrameric coiled coils: evidence for increased stabilization by Glu(-)-Lys(+) ion pair interactions. Biochemistry. 1996; 35(9):2824-9. DOI: 10.1021/bi952784c. View

2.
Degrado W, Summa C, Pavone V, NASTRI F, Lombardi A . De novo design and structural characterization of proteins and metalloproteins. Annu Rev Biochem. 2000; 68:779-819. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.68.1.779. View

3.
Farrer B, Pecoraro V . Hg(II) binding to a weakly associated coiled coil nucleates an encoded metalloprotein fold: a kinetic analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100(7):3760-5. PMC: 152995. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0336055100. View

4.
Smith S, Shaw G . A change-in-hand mechanism for S100 signalling. Biochem Cell Biol. 1999; 76(2-3):324-33. DOI: 10.1139/bcb-76-2-3-324. View

5.
Cohen C, Parry D . Alpha-helical coiled coils: more facts and better predictions. Science. 1994; 263(5146):488-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.8290957. View