» Articles » PMID: 21123843

College Student Reactions to Smoking Bans in Public, on Campus and at Home

Overview
Journal Health Educ Res
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2010 Dec 3
PMID 21123843
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We examined college student reactions to a statewide public smoke-free policy, campus policies and private restrictions through an online survey among 2260 students at a 2-year college and a university and 12 focus groups among smokers. Among survey participants, 34.6% smoked in the past month (35.0% daily, 65.0% non-daily). Correlates of receptivity to public policies included attending the university, not living with smokers and non-smoker status (versus daily and non-daily smoking). Correlates of receptivity to outdoor campus policies included being a university student, unmarried, without children, from homes where parents banned indoor smoking and a non-smoker. Correlates of having home restrictions included not living with smokers, no children, parents banning indoor smoking and non-smoker status. Correlates of having car restrictions included attending the university, not living with smokers, having children, parents banning indoor smoking and non-smoker status. Qualitative findings indicated support for smoke-free policies in public (albeit greater support for those in restaurants versus bars) and on campus. Participants reported concern about smokers' and bar/restaurant owners' rights, while acknowledging several benefits. Overall, 2-year college students and smokers (non-daily and daily) were less supportive of smoke-free policies.

Citing Articles

University Staff and Students' Attitudes towards a Completely Smoke-Free Campus: Shifting Social Norms and Organisational Culture for Health Promotion.

Sendall M, Fox L, Wraith D Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(13).

PMID: 34281036 PMC: 8297203. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18137104.


Becoming a tobacco-free campus: A survey of student attitudes, opinions and behaviors.

Pignataro R, Daramola C Tob Prev Cessat. 2020; 6:54.

PMID: 33083682 PMC: 7552852. DOI: 10.18332/tpc/125915.


Home smoking and vaping policies among US adults: results from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study, wave 3.

Li D, Shi H, Xie Z, Rahman I, McIntosh S, Bansal-Travers M Prev Med. 2020; 139:106215.

PMID: 32693178 PMC: 7494576. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106215.


"Study Natural" without Drugs: An Exploratory Study of Theory-Guided and Tailored Health Campaign Interventions to Prevent Nonmedical Use of Prescription Stimulants in College Students.

Su Z, Mackert M, Li X, Han J, Cook B, Wyeth B Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(12).

PMID: 32575519 PMC: 7344622. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17124421.


Prevalence of and factors associated with violations of a campus smoke-free policy: a cross-sectional survey of undergraduate students on a university campus in the USA.

Ramachandran S, Bentley S, Casey E, Bentley J BMJ Open. 2020; 10(3):e030504.

PMID: 32198295 PMC: 7103814. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030504.


References
1.
Hassmiller K, Warner K, Mendez D, Levy D, Romano E . Nondaily smokers: who are they?. Am J Public Health. 2003; 93(8):1321-7. PMC: 1447964. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.93.8.1321. View

2.
Shiffman S . Light and intermittent smokers: background and perspective. Nicotine Tob Res. 2009; 11(2):122-5. PMC: 2658906. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntn020. View

3.
Hennrikus D, Jeffery R, Lando H . Occasional smoking in a Minnesota working population. Am J Public Health. 1996; 86(9):1260-6. PMC: 1380589. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.86.9.1260. View

4.
Borland R, Yong H, Siahpush M, Hyland A, Campbell S, Hastings G . Support for and reported compliance with smoke-free restaurants and bars by smokers in four countries: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tob Control. 2006; 15 Suppl 3:iii34-41. PMC: 2593054. DOI: 10.1136/tc.2004.008748. View

5.
Berg C, An L, Thomas J, Lust K, Sanem J, Swan D . Smoking patterns, attitudes and motives: unique characteristics among 2-year versus 4-year college students. Health Educ Res. 2011; 26(4):614-23. DOI: 10.1093/her/cyr017. View