"Moving Forward: a Cross Sectional Baseline Study of Staff and Student Attitudes Towards a Totally Smoke Free University Campus"

Overview

Journal BMC Public Health

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Public Health

Date 2013 Aug 9

PMID 23924040

Citations 14

Authors

Sharyn Burns

Jonine Jancey

Nicole Bowser

Jude Comfort

Gemma Crawford

Jonathan Hallett

Bree Shields

Linda Portsmouth

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Baseline data were collected to inform the adoption, implementation and institutionalisation phases of a completely smoke free campus policy at a large Western Australian university with a diverse student and staff community.

Methods: An online survey was randomly emailed to staff and students to measure the attitudes towards and the acceptability and enforcement of the policy prior to implementation. In total, 969 respondents completed the survey.

Results: General attitudes towards smoking were negative. While smokers, ex-smokers and non-smokers were supportive of smoke free policy on campus, 65.7% of respondents felt the campus should be completely smoke free. Respondents indicated a smoke free policy should be stringently enforced. The majority of respondents reported that they had been exposed to second-hand smoke on campus (n = 768; 79.5%).

Conclusion: Theory of Organisational Change provides a useful framework to support the implementation of the completely smoke free policy in the University setting. The implementation process needs to consider the broad range of issues associated with implementing a completely smoke free policy and address issues such as safety of smokers, ensuring smokers are not marginalised and ensuring a comprehensive program is implemented. These baseline findings can be used to advocate for the implementation of a comprehensive range of strategies that recognise the addictive nature of tobacco smoking and address attitude and behaviour change, environmental adaptations and effective implementation of the policy. Administration should consider smokers and non-smokers when policy is implemented.

Citing Articles

University students' and staff attitudes toward the implementation of a "tobacco-free" policy: A view from Qatar.

Al-Jayyousi G, Shraim M, Alsayed Hassan D, Al-Hamdani M, Kurdi R, Hamad N Prev Med Rep. 2024; 38:102605.

PMID: 38292026 PMC: 10826297. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102605.

Public support for smoke-free policies in outdoor areas and (semi-)private places: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Boderie N, Sheikh A, Lo E, Sheikh A, Burdorf A, van Lenthe F EClinicalMedicine. 2023; 59:101982.

PMID: 37256097 PMC: 10225670. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101982.

Influence of a University Tobacco-Free Policy on the Attitudes, Perceptions of Compliance, and Policy Benefit Among the University Students: A Pre-Post Investigation.

Chaaya M, Farran D, Saab D, Al-Hindi M, Romani M, Khairallah M Int J Public Health. 2021; 66:614602.

PMID: 34744578 PMC: 8565293. DOI: 10.3389/ijph.2021.614602.

University Staff and Students' Attitudes towards a Completely Smoke-Free Campus: Shifting Social Norms and Organisational Culture for Health Promotion.

Sendall M, Fox L, Wraith D Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(13).

PMID: 34281036 PMC: 8297203. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18137104.

Students' perceptions of a university 'No Smoking' policy and barriers to implementation: a cross- sectional study.

Al-Jayyousi G, Kurdi R, Alsaei S, Al-Kaabi H, Alrushdi A, Rahim H BMJ Open. 2021; 11(6):e043691.

PMID: 34108159 PMC: 8191599. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043691.

References

Moore R, Annechino R, Lee J . Unintended consequences of smoke-free bar policies for low-SES women in three California counties. Am J Prev Med. 2009; 37(2 Suppl):S138-43. PMC: 2730500. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.05.003. View

Chapman S, Freeman B . Markers of the denormalisation of smoking and the tobacco industry. Tob Control. 2008; 17(1):25-31. DOI: 10.1136/tc.2007.021386. View

Fichtenberg C, Glantz S . Effect of smoke-free workplaces on smoking behaviour: systematic review. BMJ. 2002; 325(7357):188. PMC: 117445. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.325.7357.188. View

Loukas A, Garcia M, Gottlieb N . Texas college students' opinions of no-smoking policies, secondhand smoke, and smoking in public places. J Am Coll Health. 2006; 55(1):27-32. DOI: 10.3200/JACH.55.1.27-32. View

Watson D, Glover M, McCool J, Bullen C, Adams B, Min S . Impact of national smokefree environments laws on teachers, schools and early childhood centres. Health Promot J Austr. 2012; 22(3):166-71. DOI: 10.1071/he11166. View

Borland R, Yong H, Siahpush M, Hyland A, Campbell S, Hastings G . Support for and reported compliance with smoke-free restaurants and bars by smokers in four countries: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tob Control. 2006; 15 Suppl 3:iii34-41. PMC: 2593054. DOI: 10.1136/tc.2004.008748. View

Azagba S, Sharaf M . The association between workplace smoking bans and self-perceived, work-related stress among smoking workers. BMC Public Health. 2012; 12:123. PMC: 3296657. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-123. View

Hyland A, Barnoya J, Corral J . Smoke-free air policies: past, present and future. Tob Control. 2012; 21(2):154-61. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050389. View

White V, Hill D, Siahpush M, Bobevski I . How has the prevalence of cigarette smoking changed among Australian adults? Trends in smoking prevalence between 1980 and 2001. Tob Control. 2003; 12 Suppl 2:ii67-74. PMC: 1766106. DOI: 10.1136/tc.12.suppl_2.ii67. View

10.

Kypri K, Baxter J . Smoking in a New Zealand university student sample. N Z Med J. 2004; 117(1190):U794. View

11.

Rogers E . Diffusion of preventive innovations. Addict Behav. 2002; 27(6):989-93. DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4603(02)00300-3. View

12.

Chapman S, Haddad S, Sindhusake D . Do work-place smoking bans cause smokers to smoke "harder"? Results from a naturalistic observational study. Addiction. 1997; 92(5):607-10. View

13.

Overland S, Aaro L, Lindbak R . Associations between schools' tobacco restrictions and adolescents' use of tobacco. Health Educ Res. 2010; 25(5):748-56. DOI: 10.1093/her/cyq023. View

14.

Bonevski B, Paul C, Walsh R, Bryant J, Lecathelinais C . Support for smoke-free vocational education settings: an exploratory survey of staff behaviours, experiences and attitudes. Health Promot J Austr. 2011; 22(1):11-6. DOI: 10.1071/he11011. View

15.

Houle B, Siegel M . Smoker-free workplace policies: developing a model of public health consequences of workplace policies barring employment to smokers. Tob Control. 2009; 18(1):64-9. PMC: 2722043. DOI: 10.1136/tc.2008.026229. View

16.

Walsh R, Paul C, Paras L, Stacey F, Tzelepis F . Workplace-related smoking in New South Wales: extent of bans, public attitudes and relationships with relapse. Health Promot J Austr. 2011; 22(2):85-90. DOI: 10.1071/he11085. View

17.

Howat P, Hallett J, Kypri K, Maycock B, Dhaliwal S, McManus A . Tobacco smoking in an Australian university sample and implications for health promotion. Prev Med. 2010; 51(5):425-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.08.015. View

18.

Stuber J, Galea S, Link B . Smoking and the emergence of a stigmatized social status. Soc Sci Med. 2008; 67(3):420-30. PMC: 4006698. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.010. View

19.

Sabiston C, Lovato C, Ahmed R, Pullman A, Hadd V, Campbell H . School smoking policy characteristics and individual perceptions of the school tobacco context: are they linked to students' smoking status?. J Youth Adolesc. 2009; 38(10):1374-87. PMC: 2758151. DOI: 10.1007/s10964-009-9422-z. View

20.

Kouvonen A, Kivimaki M, Oksanen T, Pentti J, Heponiemi T, Vaananen A . Implementation of workplace-based smoking cessation support activities and smoking cessation among employees: the Finnish Public Sector Study. Am J Public Health. 2012; 102(7):e56-62. PMC: 3477988. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300823. View