» Articles » PMID: 16801293

Correlates of Home Smoking Restrictions Among Rural Smokers

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2006 Jun 28
PMID 16801293
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The prevalence of smoking is greater and smoking restrictions are less common in rural areas in comparison to urban areas. Consequently, rural smokers and their families are at increased risk for adverse health consequences from smoking. The presence of home smoking restrictions (i.e., limiting or banning cigarette smoking in the home) can be a mediator for smoking cessation and can reduce health risks for those who live with smokers. The purpose of the present study was to identify correlates of home smoking restrictions among rural smokers. We surveyed 472 smokers from 40 rural Kansas primary care practices who were enrolled in a smoking cessation intervention study. We assessed the prevalence of home smoking restrictions and examined the relationship between such restrictions, demographic variables, comorbid diagnoses, and psychosocial measures of smoking abstinence self-efficacy and motivation to quit. Complete home smoking restrictions were found among 25.4% of rural smokers with an additional 28.3% reporting some restrictions. Restrictions were associated with younger age, higher controlled motivation to quit (i.e., motivation from external pressure), the presence of children under age 6 years living in the home, fewer friends who smoke, and a partner who does not smoke. Smokers with a comorbid diagnosis of high cholesterol, chronic lung disease, or heart disease were less likely to have restrictions. Most smokers in rural primary care practices do not have home smoking restrictions, particularly those without children or a nonsmoking partner and those with significant risk factors for smoking-related illnesses. These patients may be critical targets for broaching issues of home smoking restrictions.

Citing Articles

Factors associated with smokefree rules in the homes of Black/African American women smokers residing in low-resource rural communities.

Jones D, Bullock S, Donald K, Cooper S, Miller W, Davis A Prev Med. 2022; 165(Pt B):107340.

PMID: 36370892 PMC: 9727706. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107340.


Correlates of Allowing Alternative Tobacco Product or Marijuana Use in the Homes of Young Adults.

Berg C, Haardorfer R, Wagener T, Kegler M, Windle M Pediatrics. 2018; 141(Suppl 1):S10-S20.

PMID: 29292302 PMC: 5884091. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2017-1026E.


Reactions to smoke-free public policies and smoke-free home policies in the Republic of Georgia: results from a 2014 national survey.

Berg C, Topuridze M, Maglakelidze N, Starua L, Shishniashvili M, Kegler M Int J Public Health. 2016; 61(4):409-16.

PMID: 26841891 DOI: 10.1007/s00038-016-0793-0.


Smoke-Free Public Policies and Voluntary Policies in Personal Settings in Tbilisi, Georgia: A Qualitative Study.

Berg C, Smith S, Bascombe T, Maglakelidze N, Starua L, Topuridze M Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016; 13(2):156.

PMID: 26821035 PMC: 4772176. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph13020156.


Do partial home smoking bans signal progress toward a smoke-free home?.

Kegler M, Haardorfer R, Bundy L, Escoffery C, Berg C, Fernandez M Health Educ Res. 2015; 31(1):24-35.

PMID: 26661723 PMC: 4883035. DOI: 10.1093/her/cyv066.