» Articles » PMID: 21123642

Radiation Risk from Medical Imaging

Overview
Journal Mayo Clin Proc
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2010 Dec 3
PMID 21123642
Citations 174
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This review provides a practical overview of the excess cancer risks related to radiation from medical imaging. Primary care physicians should have a basic understanding of these risks. Because of recent attention to this issue, patients are more likely to express concerns over radiation risk. In addition, physicians can play a role in reducing radiation risk to their patients by considering these risks when making imaging referrals. This review provides a brief overview of the evidence pertaining to low-level radiation and excess cancer risks and addresses the radiation doses and risks from common medical imaging studies. Specific subsets of patients may be at greater risk from radiation exposure, and radiation risk should be considered carefully in these patients. Recent technical innovations have contributed to lowering the radiation dose from computed tomography, and the referring physician should be aware of these innovations in making imaging referrals.

Citing Articles

Computed Tomography Doses Calculation: Do We Really Need a New Dose Assessment Tool?.

Szarmach A, Sabiniewicz-Ziajka D, Grzywinska M, Gac P, Piskunowicz M, Wszedybyl-Winklewska M J Clin Med. 2025; 14(4).

PMID: 40004878 PMC: 11856821. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14041348.


Assessment of scattered and leakage radiation from ultra-portable X-ray systems in chest imaging: An independent study.

Paulis L, Schnerr R, Halton J, Qin Z, Chua A PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025; 5(1):e0003986.

PMID: 39854582 PMC: 11761074. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003986.


Overuse of CT for Minor Head Trauma Patients: A Retrospective Analysis from Poland and Lithuania Trauma Centres.

Blaziene K, Nozewski J, Cibulske V, Kunigonyte M, Kosyte D, Bareikis K Medicina (Kaunas). 2025; 60(12.

PMID: 39768790 PMC: 11677707. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60121908.


Use of optical techniques to evaluate the ionizing radiation effects on biological specimens.

Fujita H, Watanabe T J Radiat Res. 2024; 65(Supplement_1):i117-i125.

PMID: 39679890 PMC: 11647921. DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrae016.


Radiation exposure and safety in low-dose CT-guided glycerol rhizotomy for trigeminal Neuralgia outside the operating room.

Dostal J, Baxa J, Stepankova J, Seidl M, Mracek J, Lavicka P Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024; 166(1):469.

PMID: 39576393 PMC: 11584485. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-024-06364-9.


References
1.
Preston D, Ron E, Tokuoka S, Funamoto S, Nishi N, Soda M . Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors: 1958-1998. Radiat Res. 2007; 168(1):1-64. DOI: 10.1667/RR0763.1. View

2.
Park H, Lee J, Choi H, Hong S, Han J, Choi B . Preoperative evaluation of pancreatic cancer: comparison of gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MRI with MR cholangiopancreatography versus MDCT. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009; 30(3):586-95. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21889. View

3.
Heilbron B, Leipsic J . Submillisievert coronary computed tomography angiography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction - a new reality. Can J Cardiol. 2010; 26(1):35-6. PMC: 2827222. DOI: 10.1016/s0828-282x(10)70333-0. View

4.
Cardis E, Vrijheid M, Blettner M, Gilbert E, Hakama M, Hill C . The 15-Country Collaborative Study of Cancer Risk among Radiation Workers in the Nuclear Industry: estimates of radiation-related cancer risks. Radiat Res. 2007; 167(4):396-416. DOI: 10.1667/RR0553.1. View

5.
Ector J, Dragusin O, Adriaenssens B, Huybrechts W, Willems R, Ector H . Obesity is a major determinant of radiation dose in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 50(3):234-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.03.040. View