» Articles » PMID: 39063584

Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation Exposure on Human Male Gametes: Damage or Benefit

Overview
Journal Life (Basel)
Specialty Biology
Date 2024 Jul 27
PMID 39063584
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

With the improvement of medical devices for diagnosis and radiotherapy, concerns about the effects of low doses of ionizing radiation are also growing. There is no consensus among scientists on whether they might have beneficial effects on humans in certain cases or pose more risks, making the exposure unreasonable. While the damaging consequences of high-dose radiation have been known since the discovery of radioactivity, low-dose effects present a much bigger investigative challenge. They are highly specific and include radio-adaptive responses, bystander effects, and genomic instability. Current data regarding the consequences of exposure to low-dose radiation on the quality of male gametes and fertility potential are contradictory. The reports suggest two directions: indirect impact on male gametes-through spermatogenesis-or direct effects at low doses on already mature spermatozoa. Although mature gametes are used for observation in both models, they are fundamentally different, leading to varied results. Due to their unique physiological characteristics, in certain cases, exposure of spermatozoa to low-dose ionizing radiation could have positive effects. Despite the findings indicating no beneficial effects of low-dose exposure on male fertility, it is essential to research its impact on mature spermatozoa, as well.

References
1.
Kumar D, Salian S, Kalthur G, Uppangala S, Kumari S, Challapalli S . Semen abnormalities, sperm DNA damage and global hypermethylation in health workers occupationally exposed to ionizing radiation. PLoS One. 2013; 8(7):e69927. PMC: 3726700. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069927. View

2.
Gueguen Y, Bontemps A, Ebrahimian T . Adaptive responses to low doses of radiation or chemicals: their cellular and molecular mechanisms. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2018; 76(7):1255-1273. PMC: 11105647. DOI: 10.1007/s00018-018-2987-5. View

3.
Pi Y, Liang H, Yu Q, Yin Y, Xu H, Lei Y . Low‑frequency pulsed electromagnetic field inhibits RANKL‑induced osteoclastic differentiation in RAW264.7 cells by scavenging reactive oxygen species. Mol Med Rep. 2019; 19(5):4129-4136. PMC: 6470919. DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2019.10079. View

4.
Hei T, Zhou H, Ivanov V, Hong M, Lieberman H, Brenner D . Mechanism of radiation-induced bystander effects: a unifying model. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2008; 60(8):943-50. PMC: 4410683. DOI: 10.1211/jpp.60.8.0001. View

5.
Lubart R, Friedmann H, Sinyakov M, Cohen N, Breitbart H . Changes in calcium transport in mammalian sperm mitochondria and plasma membranes caused by 780 nm irradiation. Lasers Surg Med. 1997; 21(5):493-9. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9101(1997)21:5<493::aid-lsm12>3.0.co;2-a. View