» Articles » PMID: 20484429

Changes in Radiation Dose with Variations in Human Anatomy: Moderately and Severely Obese Adults

Overview
Journal J Nucl Med
Specialty Nuclear Medicine
Date 2010 May 21
PMID 20484429
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Unlabelled: The phantoms used in standardized dose assessment are based on a median (i.e., 50th percentile) individual of a large population, for example, adult males or females or children of a particular age. Here we describe phantoms that model instead the influence of obesity on specific absorbed fractions (SAFs) and dose factors in adults.

Methods: The literature was reviewed to evaluate how individual organ sizes change with variations in body weight in mildly and severely obese adult men and women. On the basis of the literature evaluation, changes were made to our deformable reference adult male and female total-body models. Monte Carlo simulations of radiation transport were performed. SAFs for photons were generated for mildly and severely obese adults, and comparisons were made to the reference (50th) percentile SAF values.

Results: SAFs studied between the obese phantoms and the 50th percentile reference phantoms were not significantly different from the reference 50th percentile individual, with the exception of intestines irradiating some abdominal organs, because of an increase in separation between folds caused by an increase in mesenteric adipose deposits. Some low-energy values for certain organ pairs were different, possibly due only to the statistical variability of the data at these low energies.

Conclusion: The effect of obesity on dose calculations for internal emitters is minor and may be neglected in the routine use of standardized dose estimates.

Citing Articles

Quantification of internal dosimetry in PET patients II: Individualized Monte Carlo-based dosimetry for [18F]fluorocholine PET.

Neira S, Guiu-Souto J, Pais P, Rodriguez Martinez de Llano S, Fernandez C, Pubul V Med Phys. 2021; 48(9):5448-5458.

PMID: 34260065 PMC: 9291792. DOI: 10.1002/mp.15090.


Individualized adjustments to reference phantom internal organ dosimetry-scaling factors given knowledge of patient external anatomy.

Wayson M, Bolch W Phys Med Biol. 2018; 63(8):085007.

PMID: 29546846 PMC: 6171119. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aab72f.


Individualized adjustments to reference phantom internal organ dosimetry-scaling factors given knowledge of patient internal anatomy.

Wayson M, Bolch W Phys Med Biol. 2018; 63(8):085006.

PMID: 29546844 PMC: 6169782. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aab730.


Impact of Region-of-Interest Delineation Methods, Reconstruction Algorithms, and Intra- and Inter-Operator Variability on Internal Dosimetry Estimates Using PET.

Lopez-Vilanova N, Pavia J, Duch M, Catafau A, Ros D, Bullich S Mol Imaging Biol. 2016; 19(2):305-314.

PMID: 27632424 DOI: 10.1007/s11307-016-1003-4.


Radiation dosimetry of 18F-FDG PET/CT: incorporating exam-specific parameters in dose estimates.

Quinn B, Dauer Z, Pandit-Taskar N, Schoder H, Dauer L BMC Med Imaging. 2016; 16(1):41.

PMID: 27317478 PMC: 4912712. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-016-0143-y.


References
1.
Stabin M, Sparks R, Crowe E . OLINDA/EXM: the second-generation personal computer software for internal dose assessment in nuclear medicine. J Nucl Med. 2005; 46(6):1023-7. View

2.
Bonora E, Micciolo R, Ghiatas A, Lancaster J, Alyassin A, Muggeo M . Is it possible to derive a reliable estimate of human visceral and subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue from simple anthropometric measurements?. Metabolism. 1995; 44(12):1617-25. DOI: 10.1016/0026-0495(95)90084-5. View

3.
Stabin M . Uncertainties in internal dose calculations for radiopharmaceuticals. J Nucl Med. 2008; 49(5):853-60. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.107.048132. View

4.
Stabin M . MIRDOSE: personal computer software for internal dose assessment in nuclear medicine. J Nucl Med. 1996; 37(3):538-46. View

5.
Marine P, Stabin M, Fernald M, Brill A . Changes in radiation dose with variations in human anatomy: larger and smaller normal-stature adults. J Nucl Med. 2010; 51(5):806-11. PMC: 2931266. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.109.073007. View