» Articles » PMID: 21075877

Effect of Environmental Factors and Influence of Rumen and Hindgut Biogeography on Bacterial Communities in Steers

Overview
Date 2010 Nov 16
PMID 21075877
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Feces from cattle production are considered important sources of bacterial contamination of food and the environment. Little is known about the combined effects of arctic temperatures and fodder tannins on rumen and hindgut bacterial populations. Individual rumen liquor and rectal fecal samples from donor steers fed either alfalfa silage or sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) silage and water ad libitum were collected weekly on the first three sampling days and fortnightly afterwards. The daily ambient temperatures were registered and averaged to weekly mean temperatures. Steers fed sainfoin silage had lower (P < 0.05) concentrations of branched-chain volatile fatty acids (VFA) than those fed alfalfa silage. All VFA concentrations were higher (P < 0.001) in rumen liquor samples than in fecal samples. The interaction of sample type and diet showed a significant effect (P < 0.05) on the proportions of the bacterial community that were from the phyla Proteobacteria and Verrucomicrobia. Ambient temperature had an indirect effect (P < 0.05) on the phylum Firmicutes, as it affected its proportional balance. The bacterial population diversity in samples appeared to decrease concurrently with the ambient temperature. The phylum Firmicutes explained the first principal component at 64.83 and 42.58% of the total variance in rumen liquor and fecal samples, respectively. The sample type had a larger effect on bacterial communities than diet and temperature. Certain bacterial populations seemed to be better adapted than others to environmentally adverse conditions, such as less access time to nutrients due to higher motility and rate of passage of digesta caused by extreme temperatures, or antimicrobials such as tannins, possibly due to an influence of their biogeographical location within the gut.

Citing Articles

Diversity and functional analysis of rumen and fecal microbial communities associated with dietary changes in crossbreed dairy cattle.

Kibegwa F, Bett R, Gachuiri C, Machuka E, Stomeo F, Mujibi F PLoS One. 2023; 18(1):e0274371.

PMID: 36638091 PMC: 9838872. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274371.


Rumen Microbial Predictors for Short-Chain Fatty Acid Levels and the Grass-Fed Regimen in Angus Cattle.

Liu J, Bai Y, Liu F, Kohn R, Tadesse D, Sarria S Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(21).

PMID: 36359118 PMC: 9656057. DOI: 10.3390/ani12212995.


The Remodeling Effects of High-Concentrate Diets on Microbial Composition and Function in the Hindgut of Dairy Cows.

Zhang R, Liu J, Jiang L, Wang X, Mao S Front Nutr. 2022; 8:809406.

PMID: 35178417 PMC: 8845480. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2021.809406.


Ruminal Fistulation and Cannulation: A Necessary Procedure for the Advancement of Biotechnological Research in Ruminants.

Castillo C, Hernandez J Animals (Basel). 2021; 11(7).

PMID: 34201623 PMC: 8300264. DOI: 10.3390/ani11071870.


Morphology, ultrastructure, genomics, and phylogeny of Euplotes vanleeuwenhoeki sp. nov. and its ultra-reduced endosymbiont "Candidatus Pinguicoccus supinus" sp. nov.

Serra V, Gammuto L, Nitla V, Castelli M, Lanzoni O, Sassera D Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):20311.

PMID: 33219271 PMC: 7679464. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-76348-z.


References
1.
Nelson K, Pell A, Schofield P, Zinder S . Isolation and characterization of an anaerobic ruminal bacterium capable of degrading hydrolyzable tannins. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995; 61(9):3293-8. PMC: 167610. DOI: 10.1128/aem.61.9.3293-3298.1995. View

2.
Nelson K, Thonney M, Woolston T, Zinder S, Pell A . Phenotypic and phylogenetic characterization of ruminal tannin-tolerant bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998; 64(10):3824-30. PMC: 106560. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.64.10.3824-3830.1998. View

3.
Krause D, Smith W, Conlan L, Gough J, Williamson M, McSweeney C . Diet influences the ecology of lactic acid bacteria and Escherichia coli along the digestive tract of cattle: neural networks and 16S rDNA. Microbiology (Reading). 2003; 149(Pt 1):57-65. DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.25685-0. View

4.
Bach A, Calsamiglia S, Stern M . Nitrogen metabolism in the rumen. J Dairy Sci. 2005; 88 Suppl 1:E9-21. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)73133-7. View

5.
Nafikov R, Beitz D . Carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in farm animals. J Nutr. 2007; 137(3):702-5. DOI: 10.1093/jn/137.3.702. View