Role of RpoS in Acid Resistance and Fecal Shedding of Escherichia Coli O157:H7
Overview
Microbiology
Affiliations
Acid resistance (AR) is important to survival of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in acidic foods and may play a role during passage through the bovine host. In this study, we examined the role in AR of the rpoS-encoded global stress response regulator sigma(S) and its effect on shedding of E. coli O157:H7 in mice and calves. When assayed for each of the three AR systems identified in E. coli, an rpoS mutant (rpoS::pRR10) of E. coli O157:H7 lacked the glucose-repressed system and possessed reduced levels of both the arginine- and glutamate-dependent AR systems. After administration of the rpoS mutant and the wild-type strain (ATCC 43895) to ICR mice at doses ranging from 10(1) to 10(4) CFU, we found the wild-type strain in feces of mice given lower doses (10(2) versus 10(3) CFU) and at a greater frequency (80% versus 13%) than the mutant strain. The reduction in passage of the rpoS mutant was due to decreased AR, as administration of the mutant in 0.05 M phosphate buffer facilitated passage and increased the frequency of recovery in feces from 27 to 67% at a dose of 10(4) CFU. Enumeration of E. coli O157:H7 in feces from calves inoculated with an equal mixture of the wild-type strain and the rpoS mutant demonstrated shedding of the mutant to be 10- to 100-fold lower than wild-type numbers. This difference in shedding between the wild-type strain and the rpoS mutant was statistically significant (P </= 0.05). Thus, sigma(S) appears to play a role in E. coli O157:H7 passage in mice and shedding from calves, possibly by inducing expression of the glucose-repressed RpoS-dependent AR determinant and thus increasing resistance to gastrointestinal stress. These findings may provide clues for future efforts aimed at reducing or eliminating this pathogen from cattle herds.
The Response of Murine Gut Microbiome in the Presence of Altered Gene of .
Iqbal M, He P, He P, Wu Y, Munir S, He Y Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(17).
PMID: 39273171 PMC: 11395600. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25179222.
Woodward S, Neufeld L, Pena-Diaz J, Feng W, Serapio-Palacios A, Tarrant I PLoS Biol. 2024; 22(8):e3002761.
PMID: 39146372 PMC: 11349234. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002761.
RpoS and the bacterial general stress response.
Bouillet S, Bauer T, Gottesman S Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2024; 88(1):e0015122.
PMID: 38411096 PMC: 10966952. DOI: 10.1128/mmbr.00151-22.
Hoang M, Polte I, Frantzmann L, von den Eichen N, Heins A, Weuster-Botz D Microb Cell Fact. 2023; 22(1):153.
PMID: 37574555 PMC: 10424407. DOI: 10.1186/s12934-023-02165-4.
Nouws S, Verhaegen B, Denayer S, Crombe F, Pierard D, Bogaerts B Front Microbiol. 2023; 14:1204630.
PMID: 37520372 PMC: 10381951. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1204630.