» Articles » PMID: 36638091

Diversity and Functional Analysis of Rumen and Fecal Microbial Communities Associated with Dietary Changes in Crossbreed Dairy Cattle

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2023 Jan 13
PMID 36638091
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of varying roughage and concentrate proportions, in diet of crossbreed dairy cattle, on the composition and associated functional genes of rumen and fecal microbiota. We also explored fecal samples as a proxy for rumen liquor samples. Six crossbred dairy cattle were reared on three diets with an increasing concentrate and reducing roughage amount in three consecutive 10-day periods. After each period, individual rumen liquor and fecal samples were collected and analyzed through shotgun metagenomic sequencing. Average relative abundance of identified Operational Taxonomic Units (OTU) and microbial functional roles from all animals were compared between diets and sample types (fecal and rumen liquor). Results indicated that dietary modifications significantly affected several rumen and fecal microbial OTUs. In the rumen, an increase in dietary concentrate resulted in an upsurge in the abundance of Proteobacteria, while reducing the proportions of Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes. Conversely, changes in microbial composition in fecal samples were not consistent with dietary modification patterns. Microbial functional pathway classification identified that carbohydrate metabolism and protein metabolism pathways dominated microbial roles. Assessment of dietary effects on the predicted functional roles of these microbiota revealed that a high amount of dietary concentrate resulted in an increase in central carbohydrate metabolism and a corresponding reduction in protein synthesis. Moreover, we identified several microbial stress-related responses linked to dietary changes. Bacteroides and Clostridium genera were the principal hosts of these microbial functions. Therefore, the roughage to concentrate proportion has more influence on the microbial composition and microbial functional genes in rumen samples than fecal samples. As such, we did not establish a significant relationship between the rumen and fecal metagenome profiles, and the rumen and fecal microbiota from one animal did not correlate more than those from different animals.

Citing Articles

Temporal Changes in Faecal Microbiota Composition and Diversity in Dairy Cows Supplemented with a -Based Direct-Fed Microbial.

Campbell B, Hassan M, Moore R, Olchowy T, Ranjbar S, Soust M Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(23).

PMID: 39682401 PMC: 11640597. DOI: 10.3390/ani14233437.


Bacterial Communities of House Flies from Dairy Farms Highlight Their Role as Reservoirs, Disseminators, and Sentinels of Microbial Threats to Human and Animal Health.

Neupane S, Park Y, Watson D, Trout Fryxell R, Burgess 4th E, Nayduch D Insects. 2024; 15(9).

PMID: 39336698 PMC: 11432648. DOI: 10.3390/insects15090730.


Comparative Rumen Metagenome and CAZyme Profiles in Cattle and Buffaloes: Implications for Methane Yield and Rumen Fermentation on a Common Diet.

Malik P, Trivedi S, Kolte A, Mohapatra A, Biswas S, Bhattar A Microorganisms. 2024; 12(1).

PMID: 38257874 PMC: 10818812. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12010047.


Effect of Fermented Concentrate on Ruminal Fermentation, Ruminal and Fecal Microbiome, and Growth Performance of Beef Cattle.

Lee S, Ryu C, Back Y, Lee S, Kim H Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(23).

PMID: 38066972 PMC: 10705080. DOI: 10.3390/ani13233622.


Comparative analysis of rumen metagenome, metatranscriptome, fermentation and methane yield in cattle and buffaloes fed on the same diet.

Malik P, Trivedi S, Kolte A, Mohapatra A, Biswas S, Bhattar A Front Microbiol. 2023; 14:1266025.

PMID: 38029196 PMC: 10666647. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1266025.


References
1.
Dassa B, Borovok I, Ruimy-Israeli V, Lamed R, Flint H, Duncan S . Rumen cellulosomics: divergent fiber-degrading strategies revealed by comparative genome-wide analysis of six ruminococcal strains. PLoS One. 2014; 9(7):e99221. PMC: 4081043. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099221. View

2.
Avgustin G, Wallace R, Flint H . Phenotypic diversity among ruminal isolates of Prevotella ruminicola: proposal of Prevotella brevis sp. nov., Prevotella bryantii sp. nov., and Prevotella albensis sp. nov. and redefinition of Prevotella ruminicola. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1997; 47(2):284-8. DOI: 10.1099/00207713-47-2-284. View

3.
Lu J, Holmgren A . Selenoproteins. J Biol Chem. 2008; 284(2):723-7. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.R800045200. View

4.
Mao S, Zhang M, Liu J, Zhu W . Characterising the bacterial microbiota across the gastrointestinal tracts of dairy cattle: membership and potential function. Sci Rep. 2015; 5:16116. PMC: 4630781. DOI: 10.1038/srep16116. View

5.
Marshall K, Gibson J, Mwai O, Mwacharo J, Haile A, Getachew T . Livestock Genomics for Developing Countries - African Examples in Practice. Front Genet. 2019; 10:297. PMC: 6491883. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00297. View