» Articles » PMID: 21060721

What Have We Learned from "Perturbing" the Human Cortical Motor System with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation?

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2010 Nov 10
PMID 21060721
Citations 38
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this paper is twofold. First, we will review different approaches that one can use with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to study both its effects on motor behavior and on neural connections in the human brain. Second, we will present evidence obtained in TMS-based studies showing that the dorsal premotor area (PMd), the ventral premotor area (PMv), the supplementary motor area (SMA), and the pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA) each have different roles to play in motor behavior. We highlight the importance of the PMd in response selection based on arbitrary cues and in the control of arm movements, the PMv in grasping and in the discrimination of bodily actions, the SMA in movement sequencing and in bimanual coordination, and the pre-SMA in cognitive control. We will also discuss ways in which TMS can be used to chart "true" cerebral reorganization in clinical populations and how TMS might be used as a therapeutic tool to facilitate motor recovery after stroke. We will end our review by discussing some of the methodological challenges and future directions for using this tool in basic and clinical neuroscience.

Citing Articles

Subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation evokes two distinct cortical responses via differential white matter activation.

Seas A, Noor M, Choi K, Veerakumar A, Obatusin M, Dahill-Fuchel J Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(14):e2314918121.

PMID: 38527192 PMC: 10998591. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2314918121.


Cognition, body, and mind: A three-in-one coordinate-based fMRI meta-analysis on cognitive, physical, and meditative trainings.

Presti S, Origlia S, Gianelli C, Canessa N Hum Brain Mapp. 2023; 44(9):3795-3814.

PMID: 37067079 PMC: 10203812. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26312.


Closed-loop optimization of transcranial magnetic stimulation with electroencephalography feedback.

Tervo A, Nieminen J, Lioumis P, Metsomaa J, Souza V, Sinisalo H Brain Stimul. 2022; 15(2):523-531.

PMID: 35337598 PMC: 8940636. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2022.01.016.


Resting State Functional Connectivity Signatures of MRgFUS Vim Thalamotomy in Parkinson's Disease: A Preliminary Study.

Stanziano M, Andreasi N, Messina G, Rinaldo S, Palermo S, Verri M Front Neurol. 2022; 12:786734.

PMID: 35095731 PMC: 8791196. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.786734.


Structural atrophy of the right superior frontal gyrus in adolescents with severe irritability.

Seok J, Bajaj S, Soltis-Vaughan B, Lerdahl A, Garvey W, Bohn A Hum Brain Mapp. 2021; 42(14):4611-4622.

PMID: 34288223 PMC: 8410540. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25571.


References
1.
Koski L, Molnar-Szakacs I, Iacoboni M . Exploring the contributions of premotor and parietal cortex to spatial compatibility using image-guided TMS. Neuroimage. 2005; 24(2):296-305. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.09.027. View

2.
He S, Dum R, Strick P . Topographic organization of corticospinal projections from the frontal lobe: motor areas on the medial surface of the hemisphere. J Neurosci. 1995; 15(5 Pt 1):3284-306. PMC: 6578253. View

3.
Colby C, Duhamel J . Heterogeneity of extrastriate visual areas and multiple parietal areas in the macaque monkey. Neuropsychologia. 1991; 29(6):517-37. DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(91)90008-v. View

4.
Brighina F, Bisiach E, Piazza A, Oliveri M, La Bua V, Daniele O . Perceptual and response bias in visuospatial neglect due to frontal and parietal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in normal subjects. Neuroreport. 2002; 13(18):2571-5. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200212200-00038. View

5.
Galletti C, Fattori P, Battaglini P, Shipp S, Zeki S . Functional demarcation of a border between areas V6 and V6A in the superior parietal gyrus of the macaque monkey. Eur J Neurosci. 1996; 8(1):30-52. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1996.tb01165.x. View